Yuli Utomo
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BATAS WILAYAH DESA DINAS STUDI KASUS SENGKETA BATAS WILAYAH ANTARA DESA DINAS TULIKUP DENGAN DESA DINAS SIDAN DI KABUPATEN GIANYAR Yuli Utomo
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (404.886 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i01.p12

Abstract

Village Boundary Dispute Resolution service is the application of dispute resolution regulations village boundaries under applicable rules applied to public office in the village of Gianyar regency. This study aims to examine government policies and values ??- the value of local knowledge related to conflict resolution Dispute resolution limit of the village of Dinas in Gianyar regency. The results showed that completion of the boundary dispute in the village of Gianyar Regency Office is dominated by non-litigation settlement patterns, deliberation, and mediation. Thus, the principles of law, social change and the rule of law in conflict resolution need to be nurtured, preserved, and disseminated to the general public.
Forensic Psychiatric Examination in the YA Case under Indonesian Health Law Number 17 of 2023 Yuli Utomo; Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati; Made Teguh Dwi Prastyawan; Made Putra Bhaskara Tangkas; Hamayun Polash; Dyah setyorini
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v25i2.8248

Abstract

Abstract Received:Revised:Accepted:Keywords:Forensic Psychiatry, Criminal Responsibility, Procedural Competence, Restorative Justice, Health Law Number 17 of 2023. Background: Article 81 of Indonesian Health Law Number 17 of 2023 requires a mental health examination of a person suspected of having a mental disorder who is alleged to have committed an offence, addressing criminal responsibility and competence to undergo proceedings. Case materials: Police referred YA for psychiatric observation in April 2023; after twenty days, doctors reportedly recommended continued treatment at Dr Soeharto Heerdjan Mental Hospital. A parental letter dated 6 July 2023 sought outpatient care, referred to an orally conveyed diagnosis, and promised cooperation with investigators. A settlement agreement dated 25 July 2024 and a request dated 5 March 2025 preceded police notification that the investigation was terminated effective 5 June 2025 on restorative-justice grounds. Method: This normative juridical study applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to health, criminal-procedure, disability, and restorative-justice law. Results: A clinical diagnosis, treatment request, family guarantee, or settlement does not itself determine criminal responsibility or procedural competence. Those issues require a structured forensic examination linking symptoms to the alleged conduct and assessing the present ability to participate. The later restorative termination resolved the investigation on a separate procedural ground; it did not retrospectively supply a psychiatric finding. Conclusion: The case demonstrates the need to separate clinical care, forensic assessment, coercive measures, and restorative disposition. Because the psychiatric examination preceded 8 August 2023, the 2023 Health Law operates as a contemporary framework, while the then-effective Mental Health Law and Minister of Health Regulation Number 77 of 2015 govern the earlier procedure.