Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Kevin Kogin
Universitas Surabaya
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ASPEK HUKUM KONTRAK WARALABA PADA KEGIATAN USAHA JASA MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN Kogin, Kevin
CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya Vol 2, No 2 (2013): CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya
Publisher : University of Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Waralaba merupakan salah satu sistem pemasaran yang sedang berkembang pesat di kalangan pelaku bisnis khususnya yang bergerak pada kegiatan usaha jasa makanan dan minuman. Namun, hingga saat ini masih banyak pelaku bisnis yang tidak memahami karakteristik dari kontrak waralaba serta kaitannya dengan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan hukum persaingan usaha. Penerima Waralaba yang umumnya berada dalam posisi yang lemah akhirnya terpaksa menyetujui klausul-klausul kontrak waralaba yang sebenarnya bertentangan dengan norma-norma hukum yang berlaku. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menegaskan karakteristik kontrak waralaba, kaitannya dengan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan hukum persaingan usaha, serta perlindungan hukum bagi penerima waralaba dalam kontrak waralaba khususnya pada bidang usaha jasa makanan dan minuman sehingga tidak terjadi kesalahan yang sama di kemudian hari.
The Enactment of the Common Interest Concept and the Theory of Repressive Legal Protection on Consumer Reviews Against Defamation Claims Kongres, Evi; Kogin, Kevin; Susilawati, Connie
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Various Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Beyond
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13231

Abstract

Essentially, the objective of reviews is to offer testimonials regarding the quality of product based on personal experiences, serving as a reference for potential consumers concerning the product’s attributes and quality. Businesses also leverage consumer reviews as material for product evaluation, marketing, and enhancing after-sales services. However, in practice businesses do not always receive consumer reviews favorably, particularly when these reviews result in financial losses. This is especially true when reviews are published by influencers with substantial social media followings. Consequently, businesses may initiate legal action against consumers for defamation. According to defamation provisions, acts carried out in the public interest cannot be penalized. This study addresses the legal protection of consumers against defamation lawsuits by businesses, employing the common interest concept and the theory of repressive legal protection. The aim is to analyze the application of the common interest concept and the theory of repressive legal protection concerning reviews on social media, aiming to provide new insights for law enforcement officials in handling defamation cases involving consumers and businesses. This study utilizes normative juridical methods, reviewing literature on legislation, legal concepts, and theories. The study concludes that according to the theory of repressive legal protection, businesses that violate their obligations to consumers should be sanctioned. The enactment of the common interest concept to consumer reviews requires an examination of legal evidence and facts, and if proven, should result in sanctions for businesses as a form of repressive legal protection.
Co-Authors Connie Susilawati Evi Kongres