Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.978
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesia Prime Abdi Masyarakat JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) MITZAL (Demokrasi, Komunikasi dan Budaya) : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Ilmu Komunikasi Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology
Salma Laitupa
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Administrative Accountability in Positive Fictitious State Administrative Decisions and the Protection of Applicants’ Rights in Environmental Licensing Kartika, Eka Dewi; Laitupa, Salma; Fitriah, Mar’atun; Shalihat Ansar, Nurul
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2559

Abstract

Indonesia’s administrative law system continues to pursue the establishment of an effective, transparent, and accountable governance framework. One of the key issues that has emerged is the application of the Positive Fictitious Administrative Decision (KTUN Fiktif Positif) as regulated in Article 53 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. In the context of environmental licensing, this concept presents new challenges, particularly regarding the accountability of administrative officials for decisions that are deemed legally valid due to inaction or negligence. This research aims to analyze the forms of accountability of administrative officials within the framework of the Positive Fictitious Administrative Decision and to examine the available legal mechanisms to protect applicants’ rights and ensure the effective execution of such decisions. This study employs a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that administrative officials remain liable both administratively and civilly for the issuance of fictitious positive decisions, even when those decisions are legally recognized. Moreover, oversight by the Ombudsman and administrative litigation through the Administrative Court serve as essential instruments to uphold accountability and legal protection for the public. Therefore, judicial reasoning reform and the consistent application of the precautionary principle are necessary to ensure that the acceleration of public services does not compromise environmental protection.
Co-Authors Asrullah Asrullah, Asrullah Dewi Kartika, Eka Eka Dewi Kartika Fadli Yasser Fitriah, Mar’atun Kartika, Eka Dewi Sabrina, Dian Fitri Shalihat Ansar, Nurul Sulaeman Sulaeman Syam, Sitti Mutmainnah Yasser Arafat J., Fadly