Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Rechtsidee Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Media Iuris Jurnal Supremasi Law Development Journal Yuridika Syiah Kuala Law Journal
Didik Endro Purwoleksono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Media Iuris

 1 
Kewajiban Penyidikan Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan Syahrul Arif Hakim; Didik Endro Purwoleksono; Andi Surya Perdana
Media Iuris Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v3i3.22493

Abstract

Penyidikan yang dilakukan oleh Penuntut Umum setelah Penyidik ( Kepolisian / PPNS ) tidak dapat melengkapi berkas perkara sebagaimana Pasal 39 huruf b UU No. 18 Tahun 2013 tidak dijelaskan lebih lanjut dalam pasal tersendiri maupun penjelasan tentang ruang lingkup kewenangan penyidikan tersebut serta dalam undang-undang juga tidak disebutkan apakah penyidikan oleh Penuntut Umum ini termasuk Penyidikan Lanjutan atau penuntut umum melakukan penyidikan dari awal. Penyidikan oleh Penuntut Umum dalam perkara tindak pidana perusakan dilakukan dalam tahap yang dikenal istilahnya Pra Penuntutan. Tugas Penuntut Umum dalam tahap Pra Penuntutan yang awalnya melakukan tugas dan kewenangannya meneliti berkas perkara yang disampaikan penyidik dan selanjutnya memberikan petunjuk, berdasarkan perintah undang-undang wajib melakukan penyidikan dengan jangka waktu tertentu setelah penyidik tidak dapat menyelesaikan penyidikannya baik karena berkas perkara belum lengkap dan atau masa penyidikan yang dilakukan oleh penyidik selama 60 ( enam puluh ) hari dan dapat diperpanjang paling lama 30 (tiga puluh) hari telah habis dan jika kewajiban sebagaimana Pasal 39 tersebut tidak dilaksanakan, maka sesuai Pasal 42 UU No. 18 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan ( P3H ) dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif
Ius Constituendum Restorative Justice in Indonesia Benny Elfian Syah; Didik Endro Purwoleksono
Media Iuris Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v6i3.44405

Abstract

In recent times, legal experts in Indonesia have engaged in widespread discussions on restorative justice. This is because the country’s criminal justice system has been unable to deliver justice to society, with many cases deemed unworthy of trial, let alone convictions and sentencing. Most institutions that make up the criminal justice system, including the police, prosecutors’ offices, and courts, cannot be held solely responsible for this issue as they simply enforce existing regulations. Therefore, a new approach is necessary to resolve cases that prioritize mediation to reach a consensus based on social justice values, in which the concept of restorative justice plays a role. Restorative justice is not a new concept as it has been used by society for hundreds of years to solve problems that are not in line with social norms. Many customary practices prioritize technical solutions through local wisdom and emphasize forgiveness. Such practices include Gotong Royong, Tepo Seliro, Tego Lorone Gak Tego Patine, and others, all of which are foundational to society’s way of thinking about problem-solving. Based on these basic norms, Indonesian Founding Fathers incorporated these practice into Principles 2, 4, and 5, which are part of the Pancasila (Five Principles of Indonesian) norm. However, law enforcement may not fully understand these basic norms while implementing them. To anticipate the existing concept, criminal justice system institutions have created rules that are yet to reflect the approach of restorative justice. These institutional rules appear poorly integrated, potentially leading to normative conflicts that ultimately result in uncertainty within the criminal justice system.
Data Leakage of the Indonesian Elections Commission in Legal Aspects of Personal Data Protection utama, Frendika suda; Purwoleksono, Didik Endro; Rachman, Taufik
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i3.55931

Abstract

Hackers illegally accessed the Indonesian General Elections Commission’s (KPU) voter data system to collect voter data to sell to third parties. The regulation requires accountability for voter data leakage to protect people’s privacy rights in Indonesia’s personal data protection concept. Legal analysis of the modus operandi of personal data sales cases results in patterns of information system vulnerabilities, which can then be used to prevent personal data leakage and improve voter data protection in Indonesian elections. One of the reasons for passing the personal data protection law is the rampant cases of confidential data leakage that occur in government and private institutions in Indonesia. Hackers of voter data systems aim to profit from personal data sold to third parties. The role of the cybersecurity task force team needs to be improved with more concrete arrangements in law enforcement, and mitigating voter data leakage can provide legitimacy for the implementation of credible, reliable, and professional elections in Indonesia. Establishing the task force will optimize the application of voter data systems in conducting general elections in Indonesia and improve personal data protection.
Co-Authors Abidin, R.B. Muhammad Zainal Abvianto Syaifullah Adhi Setyo Prabowo Airlangga, Rendy Amira Paripurna Andhika Nugraha Triputra Andi Surya Perdana Aribowo, Wahyu Wasono Dyan Astutik Aziziyah, Tsania Benny Elfian Syah Ko Triskie Narendra Lukman Hakim Mahendra Suhartono Narendra, Ko Triskie Regina Kartika Sari Rudi Kurniawan Suheryadi, Bambang Syahrul Arif Hakim Syaifullah, Abvianto Taufik Rachman Taufik Rachman Thesar Yudi Prasetya utama, Frendika suda Yoyok Junaidi