Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of the ICPO-INTERPOL Concerning Biometric Data Sharing: Between Countermeasures Against Terrorist Foreign Fighters (FTFS) and Protection of the Privacy of Indonesian Citizens Paripurna, Amira; Indriani, Masitoh; Widiati, Ekawestri Prajwalita
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Culture and Technological Influence in Regulation
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

This study aims to identify and explore the challenges in the implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of the ICPO-INTERPOL concerning sharing and exchanging biometric data among the members of ICPO-INTERPOL in order to counter terrorist foreign fighters (FTFs). This research also aims to elaborate and describe the mechanism of collecting, recording, storing, and exchanging biometric data conducted by the Indonesian government.The mechanism of collecting, recording, and storing biometric data works through 3 main doors, namely: 1) in the process of making electronic Residentâ€™s ID Cards (e-ID Cards); 2) in the process of making SKCK (Certificates of Police Record); 3) in the process of making e-Passports. In the implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of ICPO-INTERPOL, the most obvious obstacles and challenges are the absence of regulations concerning the protection of personal data, and also the fact that the biometric data system itself is still relatively new and the database is not fully developed. Until today, the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) for Indonesia does not have its own biometric database system; instead they are using the database that is centralized at Pusinafis Polri (the Indonesian National Policeâ€™s Center of Automatic Fingerprint Identification System).The results of the study reveal that the biometric data recorded, collected, and stored are big data, but so far in supporting law enforcement and crime prevention processes the data have only been used as comparative data. In addition, there have also been found indications of violations of personal data and privacy, for example in relation to the absence of mechanism for data retention, consent, processing, notification, and disclosure.

The Right to a Fair Trial and Combatting Terrorism: The Case of Indonesia Paripurna, Amira
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1176.984 KB)

After the 9/11 attack, the US government called upon global war on terror (GWOT). Then terrorism has been considered as a threat of global security. It is, therefore, has led both national and international concern under US hegemony. Furthermore, it has affected the proliferation of many national counter-terrorism laws. The terrorist attacks have threatened Indonesia over years. Under the act No.15/2003 jo No.1/Prp/2002 the Indonesian government has successfully conducted prosecutions to the terrorism perpetrators. However, it is identified that there are such violations regarding to international human rights rules and standards. The concern in handling terrorism demands a balance concern between security treatments and human rights. Thus, the challenge’s today are how to maintain the rights to a fair trial for every accused, the safeguard against abuse of power and the commitment of international community to human rights, while also preserving the capacity to national and international security concerns. The article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) enshrines a norm of International Human Rights law which protects individual from the unlawful and arbitrary curtailment of other basic rights and freedoms (a fair trial), which the most prominent are the rights to life and liberty of the person. The civil and political rights are categorized as non-derogable rights, it means that any derogation measures inconsistent with the State’s other obligations under international human rights law is prohibited. Thus, this paper aims to discuss whether and to what extent the right to a fair trial may be compromised in the name of security? Does the fair trial standard can be sacrificed to prosecute terrorism?

Biometric Data Sharing in Addressing Irregular Migration and Security Issues within the Bali Process Framework for Indonesia and ASEAN Member States Masitoh Indriani; Amira Paripurna
Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights Vol 4 No 2 (2020): December 2020
Publisher : Jember University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jseahr.v4i2.17289

The Bali Process Declaration on People Smuggling, Trafficking in Persons and Related Transnational Crime acknowledges the large scale and complexity of irregular migration challenges both within and outside the Asia Pacific region. As one of the efforts to decrease irregular migration in this region, the Regional Support Office of the Bali Process (RSO) was established in 2012 to support the implementation of the Bali Process. In this regard, the Bali Process led to an opportunity to develop the use of technology and biometrics data sharing in migration and border management. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the law and policy in addressing the issue of irregular migration in Indonesia. It also explores the development of the utilization of technology and biometrics in the area of migration, security and border management, as a measure in addressing the problem of irregular migration. The discussion focuses on the role and challenges of technology and biometrics data exchange in border management as one of the most important agreements on the Bali Process. This study finds that the gaps within the ASEAN member states in regulating privacy rights and data protection have caused the difficulties in sharing and exchange data/information particularly biometric data. The method used in this research is the doctrinal legal research, which is mainly referred to as library-based research.

Pendampingan Kelompok Sadar Hukum Dalam Menjalankan Advokasi Hukum Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan dan Anak di Kabupaten Jember Amira Paripurna; Astutik Astutik; Sarwirini Sarwirini; Muhammad Zaidun; Toetik Rahayu; Bambang Suheryadi; Riza Alifianto; Sapta Aprilianto; Prilian Cahyani; Iqbal Felisiano
Warta Pengabdian Vol 14 No 1 (2020): Warta Pengabdian
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/wrtp.v14i1.12140

Kelompok sadar hukum dan desa sadar hukum telah dijadikan sebagai salah satu indikator kesadaran hukum masyarakat yang ditetapkan oleh Kementrian Hukum dan HAM RI yang tertuang dalam RENSTRA Kementrian Hukum dan HAM RI. Target dalam program pendampingan kepada masyarakat di Desa Seputih Kecamatan Mayang Jember ini adalah: a. membentuk kelompok sadar hukum; b. kelompok-kelompok sadar yang dibentuk dapat memenuhi kriteria untuk menjadi desa atau kelurahan sadar hukum; c. Kelompok sadar hukum yang dibentuk melakukan advokasi terhadap permasalahan hukum (terutama kasus kekerasan perempuan anak dan penyalahgunaan obat-obatan terlarang, korupsi) yang terjadi di lingkungannya. Metode dan tahapan pelaksanaan kegiatan adalah melalui: a. kegiatan temu sadar hukum (ceramah, simulasi); b. diseminasi buku panduan (buku saku) ‘melek hukum’; c. pendampingan pembentukan kelompok sadar hukum; d. Pendampingan aktivitas advokasi oleh kelompok sadar hukum. Luaran kegiatan ini adalah terbentuknya dan berdirinya 1 (satu) kelompok sadar hukum dan kelompok advokasi di kecamatan Mayang; Pendampingan aktivitas advokasi yang dilakukan oleh kelompok sadar hukum Kelompok sadar hukum dan desa sadar hukum telah dijadikan sebagai salah satu indikator kesadaran hukum masyarakat yang ditetapkan oleh Kementrian Hukum dan HAM RI yang tertuang dalam RENSTRA Kementrian Hukum dan HAM RI. Target dalam program pendampingan kepada masyarakat di Desa Seputih Kecamatan Mayang Jember ini adalah: a. membentuk kelompok sadar hukum; b. kelompok-kelompok sadar yang dibentuk dapat memenuhi kriteria untuk menjadi desa atau kelurahan sadar hukum; c. Kelompok sadar hukum yang dibentuk melakukan advokasi terhadap permasalahan hukum (terutama kasus kekerasan perempuan anak dan penyalahgunaan obat-obatan terlarang, korupsi) yang terjadi di lingkungannya. Metode dan tahapan pelaksanaan kegiatan adalah melalui: a. kegiatan temu sadar hukum (ceramah, simulasi); b. diseminasi buku panduan (buku saku) ‘melek hukum’; c. pendampingan pembentukan kelompok sadar hukum; d. Pendampingan aktivitas advokasi oleh kelompok sadar hukum. Luaran kegiatan ini adalah terbentuknya dan berdirinya 1 (satu) kelompok sadar hukum dan kelompok advokasi di kecamatan Mayang; Pendampingan aktivitas advokasi yang dilakukan oleh kelompok sadar hukum.

PROFESIONALISME POLRI DALAM PENERAPAN WEWENANG DISKRESI DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN (STUDI KASUS PENCURIAN KAKAO, PENCURIAN BIJI KAPUK, DAN PENCURIAN SEMANGKA) Iqbal Felisiano; Amira Paripurna
Yuridika Vol. 25 No. 3 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 3 September 2010
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Police discretion by definition is the power to make decisions of policy and practice. Police have the choice to enforce certain laws and how they will be enforced. Discretion is bounded by norms (professional nor ms, community norms, legal norms, moral norms). Officers will exercise discretion in situations here the facts or people involved don not necessarily line up with the law. Discretion is exercised far more in speeding cases, vandalism, domestic violence or juvenile cases rather than homicide, rape case, thievery, robbery. Officers often feel minor offenses are more about educating citizens, whereas serious offenders deserve the full punishment of the law. If a police officer uses his/her discretionary power correctly, not only will it help the police officer in their situation, it will help the general community as well.Key words : discretion, police officer

THE LEGAL CERTAINTY ON CHILDREN'S PERSONAL DATA: REALIZING LEGAL PROTECTION ON SOCIAL MEDIA Regina Kartika Sari; Didik Endro Purwoleksono; Amira Paripurna
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 7, No 2: Agustus 2023
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/sklj.v7i2.32557

This research focuses on legal certainty regarding the formulation of children's personal data in the PDP Law and legal protection efforts for children's personal data on social media. This research is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study show that the formulation of children's personal data in positive law actually creates legal uncertainty so that it has an impact on the implementation of legal protection related to children's personal data requiring further regulations and guidelines. Legal protection efforts for children's personal data on social media can be carried out preventively and repressively. Preventively, legal protection for children's personal data on social media is carried out by involving the role of parents, society, and the state through the establishment of special institutions that provide an understanding of the importance for children to protect and understand the benefits of personal data. Repressively, legal protection for children's personal data on social media is carried out by prioritizing the aspect of compensation if the child's personal data is misused which harms the child's personality and is oriented towards criminal sanctions as determined in laws and regulations.

Implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of the ICPO-INTERPOL Concerning Biometric Data Sharing: Between Countermeasures Against Terrorist Foreign Fighters (FTFS) and Protection of the Privacy of Indonesian Citizens Paripurna, Amira; Indriani, Masitoh; Widiati, Ekawestri Prajwalita
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018): Culture and Technological Influence in Regulation
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.01.08

This study aims to identify and explore the challenges in the implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of the ICPO-INTERPOL concerning sharing and exchanging biometric data among the members of ICPO-INTERPOL in order to counter terrorist foreign fighters (FTFs). This research also aims to elaborate and describe the mechanism of collecting, recording, storing, and exchanging biometric data conducted by the Indonesian government. The mechanism of collecting, recording, and storing biometric data works through 3 main doors, namely: 1) in the process of making electronic Resident's ID Cards (e-ID Cards); 2) in the process of making SKCK (Certificates of Police Record); 3) in the process of making e-Passports. In the implementation of Resolution No. 4/2016 of ICPO-INTERPOL, the most obvious obstacles and challenges are the absence of regulations concerning the protection of personal data, and also the fact that the biometric data system itself is still relatively new and the database is not fully developed. Until today, the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) for Indonesia does not have its own biometric database system; instead they are using the database that is centralized at Pusinafis Polri (the Indonesian National Police's Center of Automatic Fingerprint Identification System). The results of the study reveal that the biometric data recorded, collected, and stored are big data, but so far in supporting law enforcement and crime prevention processes the data have only been used as comparative data. In addition, there have also been found indications of violations of personal data and privacy, for example in relation to the absence of mechanism for data retention, consent, processing, notification, and disclosure.

The Architecture of Counter-Terrorism Legislation in India and Indonesia: An Analysis of Issues and Challenges Bedi, Shruti; Paripurna, Amira
Yuridika Vol. 40 No. 1 (2025): Volume 40 No 1, January 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v40i1.50985

Counter-terrorism law is a major challenge to any country since it incorporates a wide range of regulations of domestic law. Its multi-layered nature makes it imperative for academics to highlight comparative insights with a view to resolving the threat. The changes in the mode, tactics, and targets of terror attacks have evolved and become more complex; terrorist cell groups continue to grow, and the nature of terrorist networks across national borders ensures that terrorism cannot be tackled effectively by ordinary means. This paper employs comparative doctrinal research that aims to analyze and understand the similarities and differences between legal rules in India and Indonesia. This paper takes on the challenging endeavor of scrutinizing the counter-terrorism legislation of both countries. It delves into the obstacles confronted by both countries, offering systematically organized details on their current anti-terrorism legislations. The aim and objective of such discussion is to draw inspiration and perceptions from one another’s jurisdiction to evolve a better law. The result of this study shows that, in India and Indonesia, the current counter-terrorism legislation heavily supports the authority of the State, often at the expense of civil liberties for citizens. It is essential to develop a holistic counter-terrorism framework that allows the State to effectively thwart terrorists and their activities, while simultaneously safeguarding the fundamental rights.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search