Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi Tibuana : Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering Kharisma Tech
Mohammad Fajar
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS, LEVERAGE, DAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP TAX AVOIDANCE (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2012-2014) Mohammad Fajar; Zulbahridar Zulbahridar; Pipin Kurnia
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Wisuda Februari 2018
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of Profitability, Leverage, and Corporate Governance to Tax Avoidance in Manufacturing Company Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2014. The population are all LQ45 companies in Indonesia still operation during the years 2012-2014. Based on specified criteria, the company earned 68 were used as samples in this study. Sample selection by using purposive sampling method. This study uses secondary data such as financial statements and methods of data analysis using multiple linear regression analysis. The conclusions is: Profitability and Leverage effect on Tax Avoidance. The Institutional Ownership, the proportion of independent commissioners’ board, and Audit Committe do not effect on the Tax Avoidance.Keywords : Profitability, Leverage, Corporate Governance and Tax Avoidance
ANALISIS DAN DESAIN KEMBALI UI GAME SMARTEST BRAIN MENGGUNAKAN METODE DESIGN THINKING Anita Carolina Willyan; Mohammad Fajar; Baizul Zaman
KHARISMA Tech Vol 17 No 2 (2022): Jurnal KHARISMATech
Publisher : STMIK KHARISMA Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55645/kharismatech.v17i2.231

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and redesign the user interface of the educational game The Smartest Brain using the design thinking method in order to produce a user interface that increases children's interest in learning. Data was collected by distributing questionnaires to 20 respondents and processing data using the System Usability Scale method. Design thinking and System Usability Scale methods are used to produce a user interface design that is in accordance with the needs and desires of users, and to determine the usability level of a system. Based on the results of testing the first prototype using the System Usability Scale method, the score obtained is 72 with a Good rating. Meanwhile, based on the results of the second prototype test, the score obtained is 85 with an Excellent rating. Therefore, it can be concluded that designing the user interface using the design thinking method has solved the problems experienced by users, resulting in a user interface that is more attractive and easier to use, thereby increasing children's interest in learning.
ANALISIS USABILITY MENGGUNAKAN METODE USER EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE PADA WEBSITE MEDISOL Jessica Chanarly; Mohammad Fajar; Arianti
KHARISMA Tech Vol 17 No 2 (2022): Jurnal KHARISMATech
Publisher : STMIK KHARISMA Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55645/kharismatech.v17i2.237

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the usability of the Medisol website using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) method so that it can be further developed according to user needs in the future. This analysis was carried out using four variables from the User Experience Questionnaire method: Usefulness, Ease of Use, Ease of Learn, and User Satisfaction. Usability measurement is obtained from the percentage of feasibility based on a questionnaire distributed to users who access the Medisol website with 30 respondents. In addition, the Likert scale was used to facilitate filling out the questionnaire and processing of the results by researchers. Based on calculations on the aspects covered by the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) method, the results obtained are 86% on the Usefulness aspect, 86% on the Ease of Use aspect, 89.67% on the Ease of Learn aspect, and 84.48% on the User Satisfaction aspect. It is said that the Medisol website perfectly fulfills these aspects. And from the usability calculation results obtained, namely 86.13%, it can be concluded that the percentage level of the Medisol website eligibility can be categorized as very feasible.
Quality Control of Glass Bottle Drinking Water Products Using the Six Sigma Method Prasetyowati, Erwin; Matsaini; Sofwanul Bary; Mohammad Fajar
Tibuana Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Tibuana
Publisher : UNIPA PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/tibuana.8.2.10200

Abstract

This study aims to strengthen production performance and product quality to achieve various financial and strategic goals, such as market share, competitiveness, and profitability. The problem faced by this company is in product quality control where there are still defective products that arise during the production process. Therefore, this study uses Six Sigma with the concept of Difine Measure Analysis Improve Control (DMAIC) as a step to optimize production procedures at UD. NUSAQU whose product is bottled drinking water. The focus of this study is visual of product defects in the form of cups which are divided into two, namely Grade A and Grade B, which are distinguished based on the plastic cup material used. The results of data testing show that in Grade A and Grade B, slanted lid damage has the highest level of damage, but in Grade B the results are the same as leaking cups. The DPMO value produced in Grade A is 62,633.914, while in Grade B it is 130,961.47. The smaller the DPMO value, the better the product quality. The average value of Six-Sigma for Grade A is 3.03, while Grade B is 2.63. Based on these values, it can be concluded that Grade A has better quality than Grade B, but both require improvement and enhancement efforts to achieve 6 sigma. 
Co-Authors Anita Carolina Willyan Arianti Erwin Prasetyowati Jessica Chanarly Matsaini Pipin Kurnia Sofwanul Bary Zulbahridar Zulbahridar