Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.849
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Yuliati Yuliati
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Penerаpаn аsаs-аsаs umum pemerintаhаn yаng bаik dаlаm penyelesаiаn sengketа tanah hak milik Dita Ernanda; Istislam Istislam; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4226

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the General Principles of Good Governance in the principles used as a reference in the use of authority for Government Officials in issuing decisions and / or actions in government administration. The research method is the juridical empirical method because it examines the implementation of AUPB as one of the bases for testing the validity of government actions, namely the settlement of disputes / conflicts over property rights. Based on the results of the discussion, it is found that government officials or government organizations are obliged to apply this to create justice and welfare in society. Of course this should also be implemented in dispute resolution, particularly land dispute resolution. This research focuses on the application of AUPB in the settlement of land disputes at the Malang City Land Office, because there are still many polemics in its resolution. Fаktor law sebаgаi penghаmbаt dаri terms of legal structure аdаlаh terhаdаp object yаng telаh published suаtu hаk аtаs tаnаh dаn the object sedаng menjаdi object perkаrа in pengаdilаn dаn BPN menjаdi pihаk dаlаm perkаrа, terkаit CTF SKP yаng telаh dilаkukаn pengentriаn dаtа mаkа beberаpа pelаyаnаn pendаftаrаn tаnаh аkаn locked / blocked by the system. Non-legal factors as an obstacle to dispute settlement are the parties who are difficult to do to work together in the process of dispute resolution but never lead to zinc resolution.How to cite item: Ernanda, D., Istislam, I., Yuliati, Y. (2021). Penerаpаn аsаs-аsаs umum pemerintаhаn yаng bаik dаlаm penyelesаiаn sengketа tanah hak milik. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 32-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4226
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PENCIPTA BERKAITAN DENGAN PLAGIARISME KARYA ILMIAH DI INDONESIA Yuliati Yuliati
Arena Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2012)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (137.33 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2012.00501.7

Abstract

AbstractHonesty, integraty and originality are the most important aspects should be considered carefully whensomeone creates a work, whereas plagiarsm act occurs when someone fail to provide sufficient source tomention on one’s work. The research shows that either Indonesia Penal Code or Indonesia CopyrightsAct do not provide any definition related to plagiarism, however, Article 13,14,15 Indonesia CopyrightsAct 2002 states clearly exception and limitation in using copyrighted materials on one’s work. Meanwhile,copyrights infringement is categorized as a crime. Indonesia National Education System Actstates the act of plagiarsm without any further explanaition, but article 25 says that the act plagiarismwho done by students, lecturers, or researchers can be use as ground reasoning to higher educationinstitution to withdrawl or revoke someone’s degree. The act of plagiarism, the scope of protection aswell as the administrative sanctions state clearly on Minister of education’s decree.Indonesia CopyrightsAct 2002 has provide sufficient legal protection for creator from plagiarism act, while IndonesiaNational Education System Act and Minister of education’s decree give more specific legal protection tostudent, lecturer, researcher from plagiarism act on educational process at higher education institutions.Key words: plagiarism, copy rights, legal protectionAbstrakKejujuran, integritas dan orisinalitas merupakan unsur utama yang perlu diperhatikan dengan seksamapada saat seseorang menciptakan karya seni,sastra maupun karya ilmiah, ketiga hal tersebut seringkali diabaikan sehingga berakibat terjadinya perbuatan plagiarisme yang dampaknya akan merugikanbagi pencipta, penulis ataupun peneliti. KUHP tidak mengenal istilah plagiarisme sebaliknya UUHCtidak menyebut secara eksplisit akan tetapi plagiarisme tersirat dalam pasal 13,14 dan 15 UUHC yangdisebut dengan pengecualian dan pembatasan hak cipta, sedangkan pelanggaran hak cipta dirumuskantersendiri dalam pasal yang berbeda. UU SISDIKNAS menyebut plagiarisme tanpa ada penjelasan lebihlanjut, akan tetapi menyatakan bahwa tindakan plagiarisme dapat dijadikan dasar untuk mencabut gelarakademik seseorang. Sedangkan, PERMENDIKNAS no. 17 tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan PenanggulanganPlagiat di Perguruan Tinggi telah memberikan kejelasan konsep tindakan plagiarisme besertatindakan yang dilarang. Prinsip perlindungan hukum didasarkan pada 5 parameter yaitu Pengakuanhak bagi pencipta , Penetapan plagiarisme sebagai tindak pidana, Perumusan sanksi pidana, Adanyapidana tambahan, Mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa menunjukkan bahwa UUHC sudah memberikanperlindungan hukum bagi pencipta yang paling memadai. Sedangkan UU SISDIKNAS dan PERMENDIKNASNo. 17 tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Plagiat di perguruan Tinggi jugasudah memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta, penulis dan peneliti di perguruan tinggi terhadaptindakan plagiarisme.Kata kunci : plagiarisme, hak cipta, perlindungan hukum
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN TERKAIT PEREDARAN PANGAN HASIL REKAYASA GENETIKA DI INDONESIA Yuliati Yuliati
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01003.7

Abstract

AbstractThe distribution of food products containing genetic modified organism (GMO) in the market has the potential ito harm the public as consumers, even though consumers have the right to food security and the right to obtain information protected by Act Number 8 year 1999 on Consumer Protection. This article is a legal research that use statutes approach. The result shows that the government of Indonesia has provide adequate legal protection for consumers regarding the distribution of food product containing GMO in the form of the obligation to conduct safety testing of engineering products for business actors as outlined in Government Regulation No.21 Year 2005. Meanwhile, the government has also provided a clear definition of prohibited activities as well as sanction as stated on Consumers Protection Act and Food Act. AbstrakBeredarnya produk pangan hasil rekayasa genetika di pasaran, berpotensi merugikan masyarakat sebagai konsumen produk tersebut, padahal konsumen memiliki hak atas keamanan pangan dan hak untuk mendapat informasi yang dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Artikel ini adalah hasil penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah Indonesia telah memberikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai bagi konsumen atas peredaran produk pangan rekayasa genetika baik sebelum peredaran produk dalam bentuk keharusan untuk melakukan uji keamanan produk rekayasa  bagi pelaku usaha yang dituangkan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah No.21 Tahun 2005 tentang keamanan hayati produk rekayasa genetika dan kewajiban bagi pelaku usaha untuk memenuhi kewajiban tentang pelabelan produk pangan yang mengandung rekayasa genetika.
THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE DISSYNCHRONIZATION IN THE REGULATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE WITHIN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Dhia Fadlia; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i6.2132

Abstract

The regulation of restorative justice within the criminal justice system in Indonesia is currently governed by the respective law enforcement agencies, but it has not been codified in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which can lead to legal uncertainty. Consequently, there are legal implications arising from the lack of synchronization in the regulation of restorative justice within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly from the perspective of legal certainty. Therefore, this study aims to reconstruct the regulation of restorative justice to ensure legal certainty in the future. This research is a normative-juridical study utilizing both statutory and synchronic approaches. There are fundamental differences concerning the conditions and limitations of criminal acts as regulated by Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, Prosecutor's Regulation No. 15 of 2020, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2024. The existing partial guidelines on restorative justice, particularly regarding the conditions set forth, are inconsistent and cause legal uncertainty in determining which cases may be eligible for restorative justice, especially those under the Police institution, where the criteria are considered overly broad. Thus, the differences in restorative justice regulations among the respective agencies lead to inconsistencies in the conditions and limitations of criminal acts, as well as confusion in the restorative justice process during the investigation and inquiry stages within the Police. There is a need for specific regulation on restorative justice to be incorporated into the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to avoid inconsistencies and legal uncertainty.
THE URGENCY OF FORMULATING LEGAL REMEDIES BY VICTIMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND CHINA Utami Puspaningsih; Yuliati; Faizin Sulistio
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2758

Abstract

Criminal legal remedies are regulated in Chapter XII of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely ordinary legal remedies and extraordinary legal remedies. The interests of victims of crime are represented by the Public Prosecutor, but unfortunately if the Public Prosecutor does not file a legal remedy against the verdict, then the victim cannot file a legal remedy and must accept the verdict. The purpose of this paper is to actualize the participation of victims in criminal justice. The method of this study was normative juridical approach with descriptive analytical specification. The stages of the study were literature research and comparison of legal systems with other countries. This research shows that the participation of victims in judicial practices has become a public concern in the international realm so that it is necessary to balance the roles of victims and defendants in the Indonesian legal system, especially in filing criminal law efforts. Therefore, there is a need for material testing to the Constitutional Court related to Article 50 to Article 68 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
THE MEANING OF TWO VALID MEANS OF EVIDENCE IN DETERMINING A SUSPECTS IN THE PRE-TRIAL PROCESS Sultan Agung; Yuliati; Faizin Sulistio
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2855

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out whether 2 (two) valid evidence is only based on the quality of the evidence or should the quality of the evidence; and analyze the difference between examining the quality of evidence and examining the subject matter at trial. The method of this research is normative juridical with conceptual, statutory and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that the proof of 2 valid evidence to establish a person as a suspect in the pretrial process does not focus on determining the material truth, but rather on procedural and formalistic aspects. Basing the decision on two pieces of evidence quantitatively can cause big problems for the judge so that in addition to having to pay attention to the amount of evidence, but also having to check the quality of the evidence as the principle of evidence in Perma Number 4 of 2016 emphasizes that the testing of the quality of this evidence must be carried out carefully and carefully, so that the legal process remains fair and does not harm the rights of the suspect.
ASSESSMENT OF CREATIVE ECONOMY PRODUCTS AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THAT CAN BE USED AS COLLATERAL IN BANKING WITH LEGAL CERTAINTY Amselnius Siregar; Sukarmi; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.3020

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the existence of the regulation in Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning the implementing regulation of the Creative Economy Law regarding financing based on intellectual property (namely: creative economy products) in Article 12 Paragraph 5. The appraiser in the a quo norm has the duty regarding intellectual property (creative economy products) to obtain financing from banking financial institutions and non-bank financial institutions. With the existence of intellectual property, there are benefits for aspects of community life and the enhancement of national growth. However, the reality that the regulation has not yet functioned ideally results in the development of intellectual property (creative economy products) needing to be followed up. This research is supported by normative (doctrinal) legal research methods with 2 (two) approaches, namely the statutory approach and the conceptual approach, all of which are analyzed prescriptively and analytically. Based on the research results, it is concluded that in a country it is very necessary: first, Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning the Implementing Regulation of the Creative Economy Law in the provisions of Article 12 paragraph 5 within legal certainty, the assessment of economic products as authorized appraisers has not yet had a standard for intellectual property appraisal because intellectual property is an intangible object that has different values (changing/not fixed) over time. Therefore, there is a need for a new government regulation to complement the existing regulations. This is because intellectual property plays a very significant role in the country's economic income.
DISPARITY IN JUDGES’ DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF DOMESTIC NEGLECT (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 575/PID PID.SUS/2017/PN KPN AND DECISION NUMBER 95/PID.SUS/2024/PN TIM) Puti Almas; Yuliati; Sudarsono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i4.3738

Abstract

Disparity can be associated with the existence of differences or inconsistencies in the application of punishment in court decisions for similar or comparable cases. Disparity may be defined as unjustified differences in legal treatment, either in the type or severity of punishment, for cases with similar characteristics. This research aims to examine and analyze the legal considerations used by the panel of judges that led to the occurrence of disparities in decisions for the crime of domestic neglect, based on Decision Number 575/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Kpn and Decision Number 95/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tim. It also aims to assess whether the two decisions have fulfilled the principles of justice, utility, and legal certainty. The research method used is normative juridical, employing normative legal, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal research data consist of secondary data, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings of this thesis indicate that there is a disparity between Decision Number 575/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Kpn and Decision Number 95/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tim. This is because the conditions of “disparity in the same criminal act,” “disparity in sentencing by different judicial panels for the same crime,” “disparity in sentencing by the same judicial panel,” and “disparity in crimes of equal seriousness” have been met. Additionally, it was found that Decision Number 575/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Kpn satisfies the principles of justice, legal utility, and legal certainty. In contrast, Decision Number 95/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tim only ensures legal certainty for the interested party, failing to uphold the principles of justice and utility, particularly in relation to the victim.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 27 PARAGRAPH (1) OF LAW NUMBER 1 OF 2024 ON ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTIONS AND COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH MALAYSIA AND TURKEY Aji Malik; Yuliati; Bambang Sugiri
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3983

Abstract

Article 27 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions remains a subject of debate due to the ambiguity in defining the term “decency,” which opens room for multiple interpretations and potentially hampers digital freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This normative tension becomes more evident through cases of digital expression that are classified as violations of decency, even when they take the form of satire or political criticism. This research aims to analyze the application of Article 27 paragraph (1) in Indonesian legal practice, assess its consistency with the principle of freedom of expression, and compare it with the regulation of decency norms in digital law in Malaysia and Turkey. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, using primary data in the form of legislation and legal cases, as well as secondary data from literature and expert opinions. The findings show that the application of Article 27 paragraph (1) tends to be subjective, creates a chilling effect, and is disproportionate to the objective of protecting public morality. A comparison with Malaysia and Turkey demonstrates that decency norms can be formulated more clearly with strict limitations on obscene content without criminalizing political expression. These findings indicate the need for a reformulation of decency norms in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law to align with the principles of proportionality and the protection of digital freedom of expression.
THE AUTHORITY OF JUDGES IN GOVERNING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN INDONESIA’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Matius Evan Anggara; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4010

Abstract

The doctrine of criminal evidence, encapsulated in the maxim in criminalibus probationes debent esse luce clariores, establishes that the evidence presented in criminal proceedings should be as transparent as light. This requirement entails that evidence—both in its formal dimension and in its material substance—must be subject to rigorous testing concerning the legality and authenticity of its acquisition. Nevertheless, the evidentiary process frequently encounters problems in both formal and material respects. Judicial scrutiny of evidentiary quality and admissibility includes, among others, examining whether documentary evidence was obtained through unlawful means or produced under circumstances that undermine its validity. Employing a normative juridical research method, this study investigates the judicial application of the Exclusionary Rules of Evidence in Indonesia’s criminal justice system through statutory and conceptual approaches.
Co-Authors Abdul Majid Aji Malik Amselnius Siregar Arum Roselinda Bambang Sugiri Debora Oktarina Sihombing Dhia Fadlia Dita Ernanda Faizin Sulistio I Nyoman Nurjaya Istislam, - Matius Evan Anggara Piput Milandsari Milandsari Prija Djatmika Puti Almas Rahmat Hidayat Sudarsono Sukarmi, Sukarmi Sultan Agung Utami Puspaningsih Yenny Eta Widyanti