Prija Djatmika
Doctor Of Law Study Program, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

HAMBATAN DAN UPAYA MAJELIS PENGAWAS DAERAH DALAM MELAKUKAN PENGAWASAN NOTARIS DI KOTA BANAJRMASIN Neneng Septika Dagis; Prija Djatmika; Endang Sri Kawuryan
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.692 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i1.14223

Abstract

 Notaris merupakan pejabat umum yang mempunyai tugas dan kewajiban memberikan pelayanan dan konsultasi hukum kepada masyarakat yang membutuhkan. Bantuan hukum yang dapat diberikan oleh seorang notaris adalah dalam bentuk pembuatan akta otentik ataupun berbagai kewenangan lainnya yang telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga fungsi notaris sangat penting. Dalam menjalankan tugasnya, notaris di kota Banjarmasin diawasi oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah Kota Banjarmasin. Saat ini banyak sekali notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran di berbagai daerah, hal tersebut tidak menutup kemungkinan juga terjadi di Kota Banjarmasin ditambah akibat pertumbuhan perekonomian di Kota Banjarmasin memberikan dampak yang signifikan pada kebutuhan masyarakat terhadap jasa notaris dalam pembuatan akta jual beli ataupun perjanjian lainnya. Penelitian ini mertupakan penelitian yuridis empiris, Pendekatan penelitian yuridis sosiologis dengan menggunakan data primer dengan melakukan wawancara, sekunder dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan. Hasil dan pembahasan menemukan bahwa terdapat beberapa hambatan yang terjadi di lapangan, mulai dari jarak, waktu hingga biaya dimana hal tersebut diselesaikan dengan upaya penjadwalan ulang pengawasan dan diperlukan sekretariat MPD di Kota Banjarmasin.Kata-Kunci: Hambatan, Upaya, Pengawasan, Notaris, Majelis PengawasDaerahNotaries are public officials who have the duty and obligation to provide legal services and consultations to people in need. Legal assistance that can be provided by a notary is in the form of making an authentic deed or various other authorities that have been regulated in laws and regulations so that the function of a notary is very important. In carrying out their duties, notaries in the city of Banjarmasin are supervised by the Regional Supervisory Council of the City of Banjarmasin. Currently, there are many notaries who commit violations in various regions, it is also possible that it will also occur in the City of Banjarmasin, plus the economic growth in the City of Banjarmasin has a significant impact on the community's need for notary services in making sale and purchase deeds or other agreements. This research is an empirical juridical research, a sociological juridical research approach using primary data by conducting interviews, secondary by conducting library research. The results and discussion found that there were several obstacles that occurred in the field, ranging from distance, time to cost where this was resolved by rescheduling the supervision and requiring an MPD secretariat in Banjarmasin City.Keywords: Obstacles, Efforts, Supervision, Notary, Regional Supervisory Council
Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Terhadap Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Johanes Bornok Butar Butar; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p12

Abstract

Corporations are often neglected in the development of law as well as participation in legal development, making it vulnerable to access to justice. Corporations must obtain the same rights as humans in accordance with the laws and regulations concerning corporations as legal subjects. This is to give a sense of fairness to those who work in the company. The purpose of this study is to examine, find facts and analyze criminal liability for corporations against vehicles that have traffic accidents due to not conducting periodic tests. The method used is a type of normative juridical writing method using a statutory approach. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the LLAJ Law only focuses on vehicle drivers, the fact is that the cause of some traffic accidents is because the company does not conduct periodic tests on its vehicles. It is the responsibility of the company to conduct periodic tests on its vehicles every six months, but based on the cases described in the results of the discussion, traffic accidents caused by not conducting periodic tests by the company only focus on the fault of the driver. The current laws and regulations regarding traffic certainly do not fully support legal subjects in Indonesia, therefore there is a need for a formulation of criminal liability against corporations. Korporasi sering dilupakan dalam perkembangan hukum dan juga partisipasi dalam pembangunan hukum, sehingga menjadi rentan aksesnya terhadap keadilan. Korporasi harus memperoleh hak yang sama dengan manusia sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan tentang korporasi sebagai subjek hukum. Hal ini untuk memberikan rasa adil kepada mereka yang bekerja didalam perusahaan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji, menemukan fakta dan menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi korporasi terhadap kendaraannya yang mengalami kecelakaan lalu lintas akibat tidak melakukan uji berkala. Metode yang digunakan adalah jenis metode penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunkan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa UU LLAJ hanya menitikberatkan terhadap pengemudi kendaraan, kenyataannya bahwa penyebab beberapa kecelakaan lalu lintas adalah karena perusahaan tidak melakukan uji berkala terhadap kendaraanya. Uji berkala tersebut merupakan tanggungjawab dari perusahaan untuk melakukan pengujian secara berkala terhadap kendaraanya selama 6 bulan sekali, namun berdasarkan kasus yang diuraikan dalam hasil pembahsan, kecelakaan lalu lintas yang disebabkan karena tidak dilakukan uji berkala oleh perusahaan hanya menitikberatkan kesalahan terhadap pengemudi. Peraturan perundang-undangan tentang lalu lintas saat ini tentu sangat tidak mendukung sepenuhnya subjek hukum di Indonesia, oleh karena itu perlu adanya formulasi pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap korporasi.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA NOTARIS DAN PARA PIHAK YANG MEMALSUKAN SURAT KETERANGAN OBYEK PEWARIS Billy Adhi Pramarta; Rachmad Safa'at; Prija Djatmika
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Juni 2018
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.586 KB)

Abstract

This article described the elements of criminal acts against falsification of inheritance certificate, the responsibility of a notary and the one whose certificate of inheritance had been falsified by the others, and the legal consequences of a court decision on the land which certificate of inheritance had been falsified by the other. The method used normative juridical by using a legislative approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the element of criminal acts against forgery of inheritance certificate is the intention and intent to falsify, the act violates the provisions of the Notary Position Act (UUJN), and the notary didn’t an act outside his authority. The criminal responsibility of a notary carried out his place it is proven to have committed a violation. The regulation didn’t specifically regulate criminal sanctions against notaries who have been falsified letters due to fraud and errors committed by the complainants. The legal consequences of a certificate of inheritance forged by one of the parties made by a notary were null and void because it has removed one of the heirs and the letter would be cancelled if the postulating party can prove in court in court.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p022
Significancy and Subtancy of Civil Suit Compensation in Corruption Case where the Defendant was Acquitted by Judge Alfon Alfon; Suhariningsih Suhariningsih; Bambang Sugiri; Prija Djatmika
Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3, No 4 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, Novemb
Publisher : BIRCU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birle.v3i4.1418

Abstract

The spirit of Article 32 paragraph (2) of UU 31 / 1999 jo. UU 20 / 2001 means the country can use its right to a civil action for compensation for financial loss recovery state. The rationale for setting lawsuit replace losses in the article that indicates that in order to restore the country's financial losses due to corruption is not enough only in lean to the norms of criminal law. If the UU 31 / 1999 jo. UU 20/2001 categorized as Criminal Laws, then the regulation of a civil lawsuit in the Law, shows that a Prevailing Law may contain aspects of both criminal law and civil law. The study is the study of law by using the approach of Legislation, conceptual and historical approach. The results were obtained from studies of this are: 1) The specificity handling of corruption judging from the way the settlement; 2) The meaning and essence of civil suit for damages in the enforcement of the law on corruption. The civil lawsuit instrument is intended to maximize the return on state financial losses, because criminal efforts do not always succeed in recovering the entire state financial losses. The limitations of criminal law make criminal law instruments not the only one to solve the problem of returning state finances due to criminal acts of corruption.
Rasio legis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia Ahmad Fauzi; Abdul Madjid; Nurini Aprilianda; Prija Djatmika
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779

Abstract

Corruption if allowed to have a real economic impact, namely unequal income and increasing poverty Corruption is a common problem that occurs in almost every country, the modus operandi of corruption is to use the authority and power to take advantage for personal gain or third parties, therefore to overcome corruption crimes need a way to tackle corruption crimes. This research is a legal research using the socio-normative approach. The data used are primary data and secondary data which were analyzed using quantitative analysis. The main aspect in tackling corruption crimes is to use a law enforcement approach, one of the approaches to law enforcement is to create a Corruption Crime Court as regulated in Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning the Corruption Crime Court as an institution in charge of examining and deciding cases of criminal acts of corruption. The position of the court for criminal acts of corruption actually has a strong legal standing in the Indonesian criminal justice system, and its existence is very important and urgent in tackling corruption crimes in Indonesia.How to cite item: Fauzi, A., Madjid, A., Aprilianda, N., Djatmika, P. (2021). Rasiolegis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 11-20. doi:10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779.