Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PKn Progresif Jurnal Filsafat Jurnal Filsafat Sapientia Humana : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora International Review of Humanities Studies
Rizal Mustansyir
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Filsafat

 1 
KONSEP URANG SABANA URANG DALAM PEPATAH ADAT MINANGKABAU Rizal Mustansyir; Misnal Munir
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 19, No 2 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3445

Abstract

AbstractAccording to Wilhelm Dilthey’s hermeneutic perspective,there are six points in reinterpreting the Minangkabau’s traditional aphorism “Urang sabana urang”. First, understanding of Minangkabau’s way of life is a general process, included in an ordinary life which is expressed in the aphorism. Second, theexpression of the aphorism is called “ausdruck”, Minangkabau’sexpression of life experiment and historicity. Third, humancharacteristics in Minangkabau’s aphorism consist of: “urang,urang-urang, tampan urang, angkuh-angkuh urang, urangurangan, urang sabana urang”. Fourth, “urang sabana urang” is a man who has excellent characteristics. Fifth, the globalization influence and the modern culture have changed Minangkabau’s insight of “urang sabana urang” concept so that it needs a reinterpretation in order to be understood by youth of Minang. Sixth, the epistemological dimension in Minangkabau’s aphorism synthesizes an empirical aspect and rationality. The metaphysical dimension of the aphorism shows a relation between tradition and religion so that it arise the principle of “adat basandi syarak, syarak basandi kitabullah”. The axiological dimension in the aphorism is seen as a criterion of values which is an obligation for Minangs to prevent their identity as” urang sabana urang”.Keyword: urang sabana urang, adat basandi syarak, syarakbasandi kitabullah, Minangkabau custom aphorism.
LANDASAN FILOSOFIS MAZHAB HUKUM PROGRESIF: TINJAUAN FILSAFAT ILMU Rizal Mustansyir
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 1 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3512

Abstract

AbstractThe discourse on the progressive law blows up recently. Theassumption which declared that “law is for human” strengthened the progressive law position. This progressive law condition contradicts to the positive law which pretend to be formalistic. The law environment in Indonesia which is coloured with crisis of distrust makes the idea of progressive law accepted enthusiasticly. While the view that “law as a process, law in the making” takes the idea of progressive law as an actual thing. The problem is that the progressive law has not been established a theory yet. It still need to be explored intensively. This passage examines the progressive law in the perspective of philosophy of science, because whatever theory or sosial movement must have had a philosophical ground.Keywords: The progressive law, Perspective of philosophy ofscience
From Authority to Justification: The Epistemological Foundations of Joseph Raz’s Legal Philosophy Silalahi, Artha Debora; Mustansyir, Rizal; Tjahyadi, Sindung
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 1-2 (2025): Special Issue 2025: Law and Politics
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.105256

Abstract

This article examines the intrinsic relationship between law and values through the lens of legal epistemology, focusing on Joseph Raz’s legal philosophy. It investigates how judicial interpretation, shaped by epistemological foundations, influences legal reasoning and outcomes. Central to the discussion are normative challenges in adjudication such as ambiguity, uncertainty, and moral conflict. It also discusses how Raz’s thought of legal authority and the chain of validity among norms provide a framework for evaluating the legitimacy and justification of legal decisions. Raz argues that legal authority must offer independently justified reasons for action, reinforcing the law’s role in maintaining social order. The article further examines how legal structures shape and sustain societal values, positioning legal epistemology not only as a tool for understanding the basis of authority but also as a normative foundation for aligning legal principles with societal values. In conclusion, the research affirms that a robust epistemological approach to law, as proposed by Raz, is crucial for ensuring legitimacy and fairness in legal systems, making legal epistemology indispensable in affirming the normative force of law in contemporary society.
Co-Authors Lailiy Muthmainnah Misnal Munir Silalahi, Artha Debora Silalahi, Artha Debora ADS Sindung Tjahyadi Siti Murtiningsih