Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qawwam: Journal for Gender Mainstreaming Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum TANFIDZIY : Hukum Tata Negara dan Siyasah
Cholida Hanum
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PROPOSIONALITAS ALASAN POLIGAMI PADA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN Ahmadi Hasanuddin D; Cholida Hanum; M. Saiful Rohman
QAWWAM Vol. 12 No. 2 (2018): Qawwam: Journal for Gender Mainstreaming
Publisher : Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/qawwam.v12i2.1727

Abstract

Pada dasarnya Perkawinan di Indonesia menganut asas monogami, namun hal tersebut tidak bersifat mutlak sehingga poligami dapat dilakukan dengan alasan tertentu. Legalisasi poligami di Indonesia secara eksplisit tercantum dalam pasal 3 hingga 5 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1947 tentang perkawinan. Pada UU ini juga dimuat syarat poligami yang harus dipenuhi oleh suami yang ingin melakukan poligami. Syarat Poligami sebagaimana yang tertera dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia ini 1). Istri tidak dapat menjalankan kewajibannya, 2) Istri mendapat cacat badan atau penyakit yang tidak dapat disembuhkan dan, 3) Istri tidak dapat melahirkan keturunan. Ketiga syarat ini terlalu mendiskreditkan perempuan dalam perspektif gender islam. Sehingga perlu adanya proporsionalitas alasan agar syarat dalam berpoligami tidak menyudutkan posisi perempuan. Ketiga syarat yang tercantum dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) UU perkawinan ini harus diberikan pembatasan penafsiran agar tidak mendiskreditkan perempuan. Karena jika hal ini tidak dilakukan, maka akan menimbulkan permasalahan baru dalam yang kemudian mengakibatkan perempuan sebagai pihak yang dirugikan atas syarat tersebut. Oleh karena itu, penulis menghimbau para hakim peradilan unuk mengubah paradigma penafsiran atas syarat tersebut agar terdapat proporsionalitas syarat bagi para pelaku poligami yang tidak mendiskreditkan perempuan.
Implementation of Fulfilling The Constitutional Rights of Citizens in Religion: Case Study of Batur Village, Indonesia Cholida Hanum
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6654

Abstract

In recent years, various events showing the existence of religious freedom have become a phenomenon. Violation of respect for the individual’s freedom to embrace and practice religious freedom has an impact on all aspects of life, including education, health, employment, and access to public services. As the national organizer, the government plays an important role in creating a favorable, safe and peaceful atmosphere for the people. The slogan of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika seems to be only utopian, which is reflected in the civil relations in the village of Batur, where occupations are multi-religious. But it is important to note that the term "villages of tolerance" is not only symbolic. Studies have shown that the rights stipulated by the constitution are mentioned as village tolerance rights, and the extent to which these rights are realized in the future should be fully supported by the local government and the village government. The research is qualitative, collecting primary data through interviews and secondary data through documents related to the problem. The result of this research is that the realization of the religious rights of Semarang Regent in Batur Village is not top-down (from the state to the citizens), it is precisely that the realization of religious rights in Batur Village is collectively discussed. The community’s own awareness and mutual encouragement to create a harmonious and coordinated shared life between one religion and another
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 85/Puu-Xx/2022 Tentang Badan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah Hani Nurul Syifa; Cholida Hanum
TANFIDZIY Vol 3 No 1 (2024): Tanfidziy: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Siyasah
Publisher : Constitutional Law and Siyasah Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, IAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/tanfidziy.v3i1.2703

Abstract

It should be noted that with the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 85/PUU-XX/2022, the dispute over the determination of the final stage of the election results will be heard, examined and decided by the Constitutional Court, which was previously temporary, but has become permanent because a special electoral judicial body will no longer be established. This creates a polemic that leads to ineffectiveness. So it is interesting to be studied from the aspect of Maslahah Mursalah regarding a policy that can benefit the community and weigh the good or evil. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the study, namely the legal considerations of the judges in deciding Constitutional Court Decision No. 85 / PUU-XX / 2022 concerning the Special Election Judicial Body, are that the phrase "until the establishment of a special judicial body" in Article 157 paragraph (3) of Law No. 10 of 2016 is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and has no binding legal force; further, it is stated that a special court will not be established, but "the case of the dispute over the determination of the final stage of the election results will be examined and decided by the Constitutional Court". and Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 is not in line with the theory of Maslahah Mursalah, considering that a special court is no longer established by transferring the authority to resolve disputes over election results to the Constitutional Court.
Implementasi Peraturan Walikota Salatiga Nomor 118 Tahun 2020 Perspektif Siyasah Syari’yyah (Studi Penyelenggaraan Ketertiban Umum Di Kelurahan Mangunsari Kota Salatiga) Iroh markamah; Cholida Hanum
TANFIDZIY Vol 3 No 1 (2024): Tanfidziy: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Siyasah
Publisher : Constitutional Law and Siyasah Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, IAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/tanfidziy.v3i1.2746

Abstract

According to Article 14 Paragraph 2 Letter D of Salatiga Mayor Regulation No. 118/2020, the lurah has the duty to ensure security and public order in the community at the kelurahan level. This is also in line with the concept of Imamah in Siyasah Shari'yyah, where a leader must provide security for the benefit of his people. However, in Salatiga itself, there are still violations of public order. Therefore, this study is designed to find out how the implementation of Salatiga Mayor Regulation No. 118/2020 in the implementation of security and public order in Mangunsari Urban Village in Salatiga City and the benchmarks for the implementation of security and public order in Mangunsari Urban Village in Salatiga City based on the concept of Siyasah Shari'yyah. The type of research used is empirical legal research. The results of the study found that the implementation of Salatiga Mayor Regulation No. 118/2020 in organizing public security and order in Mangunsari Urban Village is not maximally implemented, due to the lack of awareness of the community in carrying out night watches at the Ronda Post, which is the result of not coordinating a number of residents by the urban village considering the large number of residents. Furthermore, the benchmarks for the implementation of public security and order in Mangunsari Urban Village in Salatiga City, based on the concept of Siyasah Shari'yyah, have also not been achieved, as there are many violations of public security and order. This is not in accordance with the concept of Siyasah Shari'yyah, namely the principles of Wahdatul Ummah, Al-Adalah, Karomah Insaniyah, Al-Musawah, Tasamuh, human cooperation, Al-Huriyah, Al-Huriyah, and Al-Ahklak Al-Karimah. As well as Ad-dharu yuzalu (harm must be eliminated; Jalbul mashalih wa daf'ul mafasid (achieving benefit and rejecting harm); al-mashlahul 'ammah muqaddamah 'alal mashlahatil khasshah (public benefit takes precedence over private benefit).
Co-Authors Ahmadi Hasanuddin D Hani Nurul Syifa Iroh markamah M. Saiful Rohman