Yudhi Hanggara
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PEMBUATAN ALAT CUCI TANGAN BERBASIS PEDAL UNTUK MENCEGAH PENULARAN COVID-19 DI RW 03 KELURAHAN MANGSANG Yudhi Hanggara; Suryo Hartanto; Asmaul Husna; Nina Agustyaningrum; Fitrah Amelia; Yesi Gusmania
MINDA BAHARU Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Minda Baharu
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/jmb.v5i1.3084

Abstract

Kelurahan Mangsang adalah sebuah wilayah di Kota Batam. Kepadatan penduduk di Kelurahan Mangsang yang tergolong tinggi menyebabkan potensi penularan penyakit menular sangat besar. Berdasarkan data harian SATGAS Penanganan COVID-19 Kota Batam per 11 Februari 2021 sebanyak 5768 orang terjangkit virus COVID-19 hingga saat ini dengan total sembuh sebanyak 5431 orang, pasien aktif tersisa 191 orang dan meninggal sebanyak 146 orang. Salah satu cara efektif untuk memutus mata rantai penyebaran Covid-19 adalah dengan sering mencuci tangan dengan sabun. Keterbatasan sarana prasarana tempat cuci tangan di wilayah ini menjadi masalah tersendiri yang harus segera diselesaikan. Oleh karena itu dengan adanya kegiatan PKM ini dapat membantu pemerintah khususnya warga kelurahan mangsang dalam mencegah penularan Virus Covid 19 melalui penyediaan alat cuci tangan berbasis pedal. Kelebihan alat cuci tangan ini adalah menggunkan pedal untuk mengeluarkan air dan sabun, sehingga mengurangi kontak langsusng tangan dengan kran atau botol sabun. Tentunya hal ini sangat efektif dalam mengurangi atau mencegah penularan virus Covid 19.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION, INKUIRI TERBIMBING DAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BLORA Yudhi Hanggara
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out: (1) which learning model providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning, (2) which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity, and (3) in each creativity level, which one providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning model. In each learning model which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity. The population of research was all students of Junior High Schools throughout Blora Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 272 students: 92 in the first experiment class, 91 in the second experiment class, and 89 in the third experiment class. The result of research showed that: (1) PBI model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did, but provided learning achievement equally good to the Conventional learning model did and Conventional learning model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did; (2) the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with both medium and low creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. (3) In PBI and guided inquiry learning models, the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with low creativity had, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with medium creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. In conventional learning, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with both medium and low creativity. At high and medium creativity level, PBI, Guided Inquiry and Conventional Model provided the equally good learning achievement. Meanwhile, at low creativity level, PBI learning model provided learning achievement equally good to the conventional learning model did, and Conventional learning model provided learning achievement better than the Guided Inquiry learning model did.Keywords: PBI, Guided Inquiry, Conventional, Creativity