Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Enny Nurbaningsih
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Contempt of Court pada Peradilan Administrasi Enny Nurbaningsih
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kedudukan tergugat (pejabat TUN) yang lebih kuat dibandingkan dengan penggugat menyebabkan Peradilan Administrasi lebih mudah terkena Contempt. Meski secara jelas hukum Positif yang berlaku belum mengnal lembaga Contempt namun KUHP sering dipakai sarana untuk menjeratnya. Tulisan ini akan melihat sebab dan faktor pendukung apa saja yang mendorong timbulnya Contempt ex Facie; ketidakpatutan melaksanakan perintah pengadilan yang sering termuat dalam Peradilan Administrasi.
IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 92/PUU-X/2012 DAN ALTERNATIF MODEL HUBUNGAN KELEMBAGAAN TERKAIT PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG Enny Nurbaningsih
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 27, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (355.845 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.15906

Abstract

Presidential System Government as the result of 1945 Constitution Amandments has not been accomplised yet since its implementation reminds anomaly. President (executive) in presidential system has decision authority to produce acts with House of Representatives (DPR), without involving People Council (DPD) as one of parlement chambers. To restore DPD legislation role, Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-X/2012 states that DPD has equal position with DPR and President in acts establishment. It implicates that DPD should be involved since the legislation planning, but still does not have authority to make decision even for bills concerned with its authority. This Constitutional Court brings about the trilateral relationship model in legislation process without any institutional construction towards interchambers relation between DPD and DPR. It will result in Judicial Review despite the involvement of DPD in phase 1 and 2 Process, since this involvement does not bind DPR and President. Sistem pemerintahan presidensial hasil revisi UUD 1945 belum tuntas karena implementasinya masih memunculkan keganjilan, Presiden (eksekutif) dalam sistem presidensial ikut mengambil keputusan untuk menghasilkan undang-undang bersama DPR, tanpa pelibatan peran DPD sebagai salah satu kamar di parlemen. Untuk memulihkan peran legislasi DPD bidang tertentu, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 92/PUU-X/2012 menyatakan bahwa DPD berkedudukan setara dengan DPR dan Presiden dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang. Implikasi dari putusan ini DPD dilibatkan mulai dari proses perencanaan legislasi, tetapi tetap tidak dapat mengambil keputusan sekalipun untuk RUU terkait dengan kewenangannya. Putusan MK melahirkan model hubungan trilateral proses legislasi tanpa ada konstruksi secara kelembagaan terhadap hubungan interkameral antara DPR dan DPD. Hal ini akan akan berdampak pada pengujian undang-undang, walaupun DPD telah dilibatkan dalam proses tahap 1 dan tahap 2, karena pelibatan ini tidak mengikat DPR dan Presiden.
BERBAGAI BENTUK PENGAWASAN KEBIJAKAN DAERAH DALAM ERA OTONOMI LUAS Enny Nurbaningsih
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 23, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.637 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16197

Abstract

Following the abolishment of all controlling measures except repressive control, decentralisation triggers fundamental changes in local government administration. Tight control may obstruct regions’ autonomy and hamper central-regional relation. Proportional control is indispensable for balancing out local governments’ freedom. All monitoring measures outside Act 32/2004 are unwarranted without improvement of legal instruments at central government.Dengan menghapuskan semua bentuk pengawasan kecuali pengawasan represif, desentralisasi menciptakan perubahan fundamental dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Pengawasan yang ketat dapat mengekang daerah dan mengganggu hubungan pusat-daerah. Pengawasan otonomi yang proporsional diperlukan sebagai penyeimbang kebebasan pemerintahan daerah. Bentuk pengawasan di luar UU 32/2004 cenderung berlebihan tanpa perbaikan instrumen hukum tingkat pusat.
Regulation of Cabinet Relations with the Government of Aceh within the Framework of a Presidential System Ridwansyah, Muhammad; Isra, Saldi; Nurbaningsih, Enny; Fahmi, Khairul
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.1607

Abstract

Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh allows the Governor of Aceh as Head of Government to be equalized with the Minister, but it is constrained by the mechanism for filling the position. From the aspect of the authority stated in Law Number 11 of 2006, it provides considerable authority in the issues of land, oil and gas, and the flag and symbol of Aceh. This idea will examine the relationship between the Aceh Government and the cabinet in depth to clarify the authority of the three above. The issues of land, oil, and gas, the flag and symbol of Aceh are held by three ministries (Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning BPN, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, and Ministry of Home Affairs) must be adequately resolved and handed over to the Governor of Aceh as Head of the Aceh Government so that the principles of specialness and privileges accommodated by Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution can be realized by the Aceh region which is decentralized. Management of the relationship between the Cabinet and the Aceh Government is an effort to strengthen the presidential system because the presidential system is now burdened by party elites, also impacting the Governor of the asymmetric decentralized region.
Co-Authors Khairul Fahmi Muhammad Ridwansyah Saldi Isra