Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.908
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Constitutional Review Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi JAPHTN-HAN Mimbar Hukum Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) SASI JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Jurnal Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara
Andy Omara
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Mimbar Hukum

 1 
PERKEMBANGAN TEORI DAN PRAKTIK MENGENAI PARLEMEN DI INDONESIA Andy Omara; Joko Setiono; Muhammad Ibrahim; Faiz Rahman
Mimbar Hukum Vol 33 No 1 (2021): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.363 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v33i1.1950

Abstract

Abstract The idea of a parliament system continues to develop from time to time. There are many thoughts of constitutional law experts which later became the theoretical basis for the implementation of the parliament system in a country, including in Indonesia. Furthermore, the existence of representative institutions such as the MPR, DPR, and DPD based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, also become an academic discourse concerning what kind of parliament system used in Indonesian parliament. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the existing theories on the parliament system and how it implemented, especially in Indonesia. Based on the background above, this research aims to find out and understand the theories and experts thought on parliament, as well as to find out and understand the implementation of parliament system in Indonesia, viewed from the historical-judicial approach. Conceptually, the theories concerning parliament can be traced since the time of Ancient Greece. Moreover, several theories regarding parliament developed, such as accommodation of group interests in the parliament, and theory on division of parliament chambers. Regarding the implementation of parliament system in Indonesia, historically and judicially, it has its own dynamics, especially in the context of accommodation of group interests and the practice of parliament chambers’ division. For instance, in the early independence period and after the stipulation of 1959 Presidential Decree, the system reflected was unicameral, while during the 1949 Constitution of RIS period was bicameral system. Furthermore, after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, there is also a discourse concerning the form of parliament division that applied, whether it was unicameral, bicameral, or tricameral. Intisari Ide mengenai Parlemen, cabang pemerintahan yang berkuasa membuat dan mengubah undang-undang, telah menjadi topik perdebatan bagi para sarjana sejak zaman dulu kala. Artikel ini bermaksud untuk menceritakan secara singkat tentang perkembangan konsep lembaga legislatif dan menjelaskan dinamikaperkembangan sistem parlemen di Indonesia dalam hukum konstitusi dari sudut pandang historis. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Parlemen adalah institusi yang terus berkembang, dengan sistem bikameralisme yang tampaknya lebih cocok dengan sistem demokrasi perwakilan. Meskipun telah mempraktikkan sistem parlemen yang berbeda-beda dalam sejarahnya, sejak masa reformasi Indonesia lebih cenderung menganut sistem bikameralisme lunak.
INTERPRETASI FRASA ADIL DAN LAYAK DALAM HUBUNGAN KERJA DALAM PASAL 28D AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Panji Mulkillah Ahmad; Andy Omara
Mimbar Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2023): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v35i1.5158

Abstract

Abstract Everyone wants treatment that “just and favourable in working relations”, as a right that is guaranteed by Article 28D paragraph (2) of the UUD 1945. However, the unclear meaning of this phrase raises problems of labor protection and uncertainty over the wage system. This article examines the meaning of the phrase “just and favourable in working relations” in the minutes of the Second Amendment to the UUD 1945 and the decisions of the Constitutional Court, as well as the implications of the unclear meaning of the phrase. This research is normative legal research with historical, casuistic, and conceptual approaches. The conclusions of this study: 1) The formulation of Article 28D paragraph (2) in the second amendment session of the 1945 Constitution originates from the MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998 concerning Human Rights, which refers to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2) The phrase “just and favourable in working relations” was interpreted differently by the Constitutional Court in several decisions. 3) There is no clear meaning in the decisions of the Constitutional Court for the phrase “just and favourable in working relations”. The Constitutional Court also did not interpret this phrase further with ILO recommendations and conventions which have clear criteria for a just and favourable work relationship. 4) This ambiguity has implications for workers not being protected in informal working relationships and changes in wage arrangements that do not refer to just and favourable work criteria. Abstrak Setiap orang mendambakan perlakuan “adil dan layak dalam hubungan kerja”, sebagai hak yang dijamin Pasal 28D ayat (2) UUD 1945. Namun ketidakjelasan makna atas frasa tersebut menimbulkan problem perlindungan tenaga kerja dan ketidakpastian sistem pengupahan. Artikel ini mengkaji makna atas frasa “adil dan layak dalam hubungan kerja” dalam risalah sidang Perubahan Kedua UUD 1945 dan putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, serta implikasi ketidakjelasan makna atas frasa tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan historis, kasuistis dan konseptual. Kesimpulan penelitian ini: 1) Perumusan Pasal 28D ayat (2) dalam sidang perubahan kedua UUD 1945 bersumber dari Tap MPR Nomor XVII/MPR/1998 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, yang merujuk ke Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia dan Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya. 2) Frasa “adil dan layak dalam hubungan kerja” diinterpretasikan MK secara berbeda dalam beberapa putusan. 3) Tidak terdapat makna yang jelas dalam putusan-putusan MK atas frasa “adil dan layak dalam hubungan kerja”. MK juga tidak menginterpretasi frasa tersebut lebih lanjut dengan rekomendasi dan konvensi ILO yang memiliki kriteria jelas hubungan kerja adil dan layak. 4) Ketidakjelasan tersebut berimplikasi pada tidak terlindunginya tenaga kerja dalam hubungan kerja informal dan perubahan-perubahan pengaturan pengupahan yang tidak mengacu pada kriteria kerja adil dan layak.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Bubu Atmoredjo, Sudjito Dian Agung Wicaksono Faiz Rahman Faiz Rahman, Faiz Fikri AR, M Gunawan A. Tauda Gunawan A. Tauda Joko Setiono Kristina Viri Labib Muttaqin Muhammad Ibrahim Ni'matul Huda Panji Mulkillah Ahmad Rahman, Faiz Yulkarnain Harahap