Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Faiz Rahman, Faiz
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
CONTEXTUALIZING RESTORATIVE JUSTICE THROUGH DIVERSION MECHANISM: A STUDY OF INDONESIA JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM Rahman, Faiz
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 9, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Implementation of restorative justice in the juvenile justice system in many countries has undergone its dynamics in the past few decades, including in Indonesia. The enactment of Indonesia Juvenile Justice System Law in mid-2014, which invalidates the 1997 Juvenile Court Law, became a significant point of juvenile justice reformation in Indonesia. The new Law began to shift the retributive paradigm in the Juvenile Court Law, as the previous statutory basis for juvenile justice in Indonesia, to restorative justice paradigm. The new Law introduces the Diversion mechanism as a means to implement the restorative justice approach. This article seeks to discuss how restorative justice can be contextualized through diversion mechanism, as well as to consider whether the new Indonesia Juvenile Justice System utilises restorative justice in a marginalized, boutique, or tokenistic way. Furthermore, this article uses statutory and theoretical approaches to examine the contextualization of restorative justice through the diversion mechanism introduced in the new Juvenile Justice System Law.
Measuring the Compatibility of Conditional Decision in Formal Constitutional Review by the Constitutional Court: Menakar Kompatibilitas Putusan Bersyarat dalam Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Rahman, Faiz; Wicaksono, Dian Agung
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2036

Abstract

The existence of conditional decisions becomes dynamic in constitutional review, including their use in procedural constitutional reviews. Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is the first decision to grant the petition and use a conditional decision model. Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier, using the conditional decision model in the decision results in discourse among various parties, including government institutions, law enforcers, academics, and the general public. With the growing discourse, this research aims to analyze the compatibility of the conditional decision model in formal constitutional reviews by examining various formal constitutional review decisions and the conditional decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court. This research indicates that the conditional decision is incompatible with formal constitutional review. This can be observed from the incompatibility of conditional decisions with the regulatory design of formal constitutional reviews and their legal consequences.
Why Constitutional Courts Back Death Penalty? Insights from Indonesia and South Korea Omara, Andy; Rahman, Faiz
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 7 Issue 2 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v7i2.10773

Abstract

This article explores the paradoxical affirmation of the death penalty by the Constitutional Courts in Indonesia and South Korea, despite constitutional guarantees for the right to life and the fundamental right of human dignity. Through historical and content analyses, it explores how these courts interpret these rights in relation to the death penalty and why they affirm it constitutional. Both countries recognise the nonderogable nature of these rights, yet their Constitutional Courts allow for legal restrictions. Constitutional Court’s decision to impose limitations on nonderogable rights demonstrates their preference for maintaining a cautious and conservative approach. The examination of Constitutional Courts’ decisions reveals that the debate over the death penalty’s constitutionality extends beyond legal considerations, involving political dynamics and historical factors. This article underscores the complex interplay between constitutional guarantees, judicial interpretation, and sociopolitical contexts in shaping the countries’ human rights protection trajectories, especially in the context of nonderogable rights. It also highlights the crucial role of Constitutional Courts in safeguarding the right to life, as their decisions can significantly impact human rights protection in these countries.
From Meaningful to Meaningless Participation: The Tragedy of Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on Job Creation Mochtar, Zainal Arifin; Arizona, Yance; Rahman, Faiz; Mubdi, Umar; Ruhpinesthi, Garuda Era; Wafi, Mochamad Adli
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 31 No. 2: December 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v31i2.23557

Abstract

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court introduced the concept of meaningful participation in the lawmaking process, emphasizing the right to be heard, considered, and explained. This concept was institutionalized through amendments to the Law on Lawmaking Procedures (Law Number 13 of 2022). However, meaningful participation remains poorly implemented, as demonstrated by the lack of public involvement in the issuance of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law legalizing the Omnibus Law on Job Creation and the Constitutional Court's ruling on Law Number 6 of 2023 (Job Creation Law 2.0), which deemed public participation irrelevant for emergency laws. These developments highlight inconsistencies in applying the principle of meaningful participation in Indonesia’s legislative practices. This research evaluates the institutionalization of meaningful participation in Law Number 13 of 2022 and its practical application in Indonesia’s lawmaking process. This research uses doctrinal legal research methods by examining library materials and secondary data to analyze the legal framework and its implementation. The findings reveal a significant gap between the theoretical framework of meaningful participation and its application in practice, particularly in emergency lawmaking. In conclusion, while the institutionalization of meaningful participation reflects a positive step, inconsistent application undermines its potential to enhance democratic governance in Indonesia.
RELEVANSI DAN KONTRIBUSI METODE KONVERSI SUARA MENJADI KURSI DALAM UPAYA PENYEDERAHANAAN JUMLAH PARTAI POLITIK DI INDONESIA Wicaksono, Dian Agung; Rahman, Faiz; Hantoro, Bimo Fajar
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 17, No 3 (2020): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2020
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v17i3.652

Abstract

Dalam kontestasi pemilihan umum, pemilihan metode konversi suara menjadi kursi kerap kali kurang mendapatkan perhatian dalam pengaturan pemilu. Padahal, perbedaan jenis metode konversi suara yang digunakan akan berpengaruh pula pada perbedaan jumlah kursi yang bisa didapatkan oleh suatu partai politik di parlemen. Dalam sejarah kepemiluan di Indonesia, setidaknya terdapat dua jenis metode konversi suara yang telah digunakan, yakni metode Kuota Hare dan metode Divisor Sainte-Lague. Perubahan metode tersebut tentu secara praktis berpengaruh pada strategi dan pola pergerakan partai politik dalam kontestasi pemilu guna memperoleh kursi di parlemen, apalagi mengingat Indonesia yang juga menerapkan sistem multipartai. Mendasarkan pada hal tersebut, Penulis berusaha memahami apakah perubahan metode konversi suara memiliki pengaruh besar dalam menyederhanakan partai politik di Indonesia. Untuk itu, Penulis juga melakukan simulasi penghitungan suara dengan menggunakan berbagai metode konversi suara. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan metode konversi suara berimplikasi terhadap penentuan jumlah kursi yang didapatkan partai politik di parlemen. Lebih lanjut, dari berbagai metode yang digunakan, metode divisor d’Hondt merupakan metode yang berimplikasi cukup signifikan dalam upaya menyederhanakan jumlah partai politik di parlemen.
KERANGKA HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI DALAM PENERAPAN SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN BERBASIS ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA Rahman, Faiz
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 18, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2021
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v18i1.736

Abstract

Perlindungan data pribadi menjadi salah satu aspek penting yang perlu diterapkan dalam penyelenggaraan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE). Hal ini salah satunya dilihat dari rencana pemerintah dalam menggunakan dan mengelola data masyarakat, termasuk data pribadi, melalui pemanfaatan berbagai teknologi baru seperti big data, Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, dan lain sebagainya; serta beberapa kasus pelanggaran atau penyalahgunaan data pribadi yang terjadi beberapa waktu silam. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji persinggungan kepentingan antara individu dengan negara dalam penggunaan data pribadi, serta memahami dinamika pengaturan perlindungan data pribadi, khususnya yang terkait dengan SPBE. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: Pertama, kepentingan individu atas perlindungan privasi dan keamanan informasi, serta kepentingan Negara dalam mengembankan pelayanan kepada masyarakat melalui pemanfaatan data pribadi masyarakat menjadi penting untuk diakomodasi dalam kerangka hukum perlindungan data pribadi; dan Kedua, pengaturan mengenai data pribadi pada level UU masih diatur secara sporadis dengan tingkat pengaturan yang berbeda-beda. Untuk mengatasi potensi inkonsistensi pengaturan, setidaknya terdapat beberapa hal yang perlu dilakukan seperti segera mengesahkan RUU Data Pribadi, termasuk di dalamnya membahas terkait dengan definisi dan klasifikasi data, mengakomodasi prinsip-prinsip perlindungan data pribadi, pembatasan akses terhadap data pribadi jenis tertentu, serta meningkatkan standar keamanan informasi yang dipegang.
Co-Authors Andy Omara Bimo Fajar Hantoro Dian Agung Wicaksono Mubdi, Umar Ruhpinesthi, Garuda Era Wafi, Mochamad Adli Yance Arizona Zainal Arifin Mochtar