Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.204
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Notariil Jurnal Hukum Prasada Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum Jurnal Preferensi Hukum (JPH)
I Made Sepud
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Hukuman Mati terhadap Narapidana Terorisme dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia I Putu Gde Iwan Putra Darmayatna; I Made Sepud; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia the death penalty has always been a matter of arguments because isn't based 011 the 1945 Constitution, the death penalty is in highest legal caste as the toughest punishment in the world. In this research, there are two problem formulations, namely how to regulate the death penalty against terrorism in relation to the protection of human rights and how to take legal measures against terrorism convicts to obtain legal relief. This research used the type of normative research, the techniques in the data collection are based on literature study. The results of this research indicate a conflict between the regulation of the death penalty and human rights. The regulation of the death penalty against terrorism in the relation to the protection of human rights has resulted in the emergence of various opinions and debates where the death penalty is considered to violate human rights and some consider this punishment to be applied. The effort by terrorism to obtain Juggleries a legal policy that has a basic idea i11 protecting human rights. Legal efforts to file an appeal, cassation, review to filing clemency request forgiveness from the President of the prisoners to reduce the law.
Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Santet Rachmad Alif Al Buchori; I Made Sepud; I Made Minggu Widyantara
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The philosophical background of witchcraft can be classified as a criminal act because witchcraft is recognized and believed to exist in the community, and causes unrest, but cannot be prevented and eradicated through law because of difficulties in proving it. So in this case, criminal sanctions are needed for the perpetrators of witchcraft. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of the crime of witchcraft. The method used in this research is normative with a statutory approach. The data sources used are primary, secondary, tertiary data sources obtained from recording and quoting relevant legal materials. The results of the study reveal that accountability for perpetrators of witchcraft is not written or listed in the current Criminal Code (KUHP). But it is different in the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP), perpetrators of witchcraft can now be made a criminal act even though it does not specifically include the word witchcraft in the RKUHP. The formulation of the crime in Article 293 of the RKUHP is increasingly clear that perpetrators of witchcraft possessing the elements referred to may be subject to a maximum imprisonment of 5 years and a category IV fine.
Co-Authors A A NGR Raka Dani Wiryantha A.A. Sg. Laksmi Dewi aan saputra Agustinus Yitsak Mannuel Kapitan Ardi Putra Dewa Agung Diah Gayatri Sudibya Gede Widya Arsana I Gede Somonita I Ketut Sukadana I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Suwitra I Made Suwitra, I Made I Nyoman Sujana I Putu Gde Iwan Putra Darmayatna I Putu Suantika Ida Bagus Made Murda Soma Widya Karma, Ni Made Sukaryati Komang Gede Dicki Saputra Rachmad Alif Al Buchori Simon Nahak