Robby Satria
Putera Batam University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

INSERTIONAL CODE MIXING BY THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN PUTERA BATAM UNIVERSITY Nurma Dhona Handayani; Robby Satria
English Language Teaching and Research Vol 1, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : English Language Teaching and Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (808.871 KB)

Abstract

This research discusses the types of code-mixing based on the characteristics of insertion. Mixing of the language is the insertion of a word or phrase of one language to other language where one language as a base or matrix language. A person who has mixed is if he or she uses a word or phrase from another language. Otherwise, the phenomenon of mixing occurs, if a person uses one clause which has the grammatical structure of one language and after that, it is constructed based on the grammar of another. The phenomena of code-mixing can also occur in English students’ communication. Therefore, this research aims to find out what are the characteristics of code-mixing insertion found in the utterances of English Department students in Putera Batam University. Data were collected by using a non-participant observation, recording techniques and transcription. Analysis of the data refers to the Musyken’s code-mixing typology toward the utterances between Indonesian and English.  After analyzing the data, there are two insertional code mixing found, single constituent and morphological integration. Single constituent occurs dominantly because the habit of the student in replacing some of words in English into Bahasa Indonesia. Morphological integration happens when the students tend to add affixation into some words in English thus the possibility of insertion created frequently. Key words: Code mixing, single constituent, morphological integration.
LEXICAL COHESION OF JOE BIDEN’S SPEECH IN PHILADELPHIA: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS Agustina Sihombing; Robby Satria
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 4, JULY 2024
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In discourse analysis, speech was defined as a form of communication involving the production and expression of spoken language. In this study, researchers used spoken language, namely speech. This study aims to discover the types of lexical cohesion in Joe Biden’s speech in Philadelphia. The researchers applied Brian Paltridge’s theory, which divides lexical cohesion into six types: antonymy, collocation, synonymy, repetition, meronymy, and hyponymy. The qualitative method was used to carry out this study. The data collection method is observation with a note-taking technique by watching and listening to the data source. The analyzing data method is identification with an identity technique by classifying the data that have been collected. Results of this study, the researchers found 20 data related to the forms of lexical cohesion. There are 7 data containing antonymy, 1 data containing collocation, 3 data containing synonymy, and 9 data containing repetition. Repetition is a strategy of lexical cohesion that Joe Biden employed frequently to emphasize his points in each line of his statements. The researchers did not find the data related to meronymy and hyponymy, because there were no data related to part of a whole or no data showing a relationship between general and specific.
ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL COHESION ON STEVE HARVEY MOTIVATIONAL SPEECH Rohit La Ami; Robby Satria
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aimed to identify the grammatical cohesion devices in Steve Harvey’s speech, using a discourse analysis approach. The theory for this study was based on Halliday and Hasan's (1976) theory. Data collection was conducted through observation, involving watching, listening, and transcribing the speeches. The data was then analyzed using an identification method, where the context of each phenomenon was described, and the data was categorized according to the theory. The analysis revealed 10 references, 1 substitution, 1 ellipsis, and 3 conjunctions in the speech. The results indicate that the use of references dominates the speech delivered by the speaker, reflecting a strong reliance on this cohesive device to maintain clarity and continuity. Conjunctions are the second most frequently used grammatical elements, playing a crucial role in connecting various pieces of information and ideas throughout the speech. This frequent use of conjunctions helps to ensure that the speech flows smoothly and logically from one point to the next. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of cohesive devices in effective communication, particularly in public speaking. Understanding the role of these components can provide valuable insights into how successful speeches are constructed.