Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JER

Full Costing Analysis of Power Generation Supply Costs: Differences Across Power Plant Types in 2023 Heryawan, Heryawan; Prasetyo, Tri Joko; Syaipudin, Usep
Jurnal Economic Resource Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): September - February
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57178/jer.v7i2.1221

Abstract

Electricity production costs in power plants are closely linked to electricity tariffs (selling prices). To fund power generation, both direct and indirect costs, including basic and overhead costs, are calculated as components of the Power Generation Supply Cost (BPP). Changes in BPP components impact overall costs, affecting total BPP. This study aims to compare and analyze cost differences among PLN power plants and identify which types of power plants show significant cost variations. Conducted at PT PLN (Persero) in 2023, the research uses an exploratory descriptive method with quantitative data from financial reports and time-series data. The study examines four BPP subcategories across 38 power plants, grouped into six categories. Multivariate analysis is applied using SPSS. Results show that power plant groups significantly influence inefficiencies in BPP. Specifically, BPP A has inconsistent cost variations, with high deviations in fixed asset depreciation, leased asset depreciation, and loan expenses. Certain power plants show inefficiencies affecting BPP. PLTGU and PLTD contribute the highest costs in BPP A and BPP D, respectively. Overall, PLTU is the most efficient group, significantly impacting BPP elasticity.
The Effect of Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure on Market Performance: Financial Performance as a Moderating Variable Saputra, Febi; Prasetyo, Tri Joko; Alvia, Liza
Jurnal Economic Resource Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): March-August
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57178/jer.v8i1.1264

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of environmental performance and environmental disclosure on market performance, with financial performance as a moderating variable. The research is motivated by the growing emphasis on sustainable practices and the market's increasing attention to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics. A quantitative method using explanatory research was applied, with data collected from 34 companies listed in the SRI-KEHATI, ESG, and LQ45 Low Carbon indices on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014–2023. Environmental performance was measured using PROPER ratings, environmental disclosure through the GRI-based CSR Disclosure Index, and market performance via Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR). Return on Equity (ROE) was used as the moderating variable. The results indicate that neither environmental performance nor disclosure has a statistically significant direct effect on market performance. However, financial performance was found to significantly moderate the relationship between environmental performance and market performance, suggesting that companies with higher ROE can better leverage environmental initiatives to influence investor perceptions. In contrast, financial performance did not moderate the effect of environmental disclosure on market performance, implying that investors may respond more directly to environmental transparency rather than being influenced by financial condition. The findings support signaling and legitimacy theories while highlighting the need for more detailed environmental disclosures. Limitations include the narrow sample and inconsistencies in disclosure timing. Future research should consider larger samples, external market factors, and alternative performance indicators to further explore the nexus between sustainability and financial outcomes.