Budi Arta Atmaja
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penerapan Pasal 27 Ayat (3) UU ITE dalam Perkara Pencemaran Nama Baik melalui Media Sosial terhadap Kelompok Orang Rezkyta Pasca Abrini Daeng Ngiji; Sigid Suseno; Budi Arta Atmaja
Jurnal Fundamental Justice Volume 3 No 1 Maret 2022
Publisher : Universitas Bumigora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30812/fundamental.v3i1.1796

Abstract

Defamation is first regulated in Article 310 of the Criminal Code to protect the honor and reputation of each individuals. Defamation on electronic media is regulated in Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law. Based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 50/PUU-VI/2008, the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law refers to the Article 310 of the Criminal Code which requires a complaint (klacht). The implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law in the cases of defamation of a group of people often creates confusion due to the unclear person being addressed. The implementation of this Article as an absolute complaint offense in defamation cases addressed to a group of people is still improper because the complaint in this case initiated by someone who is not directly harmed but as a group. This Article is still being implemented based on the interpretation of each law enforcement officials which causes its implementation does not reflect the legal certainty. The research method used is normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive specifications, that describes the regulations with legal theory and practical implementation.
Restorative Justice in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse by Children: Between Child Protection and the Enforcement of Justice Permas Teti; Somawijaya, Somawijaya; Budi Arta Atmaja
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i1.4983

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the application of restorative justice in cases of child molestation by children, by analyzing its legal and ethical implications. The method used was empirical jurisprudence with an interdisciplinary approach that integrated law, social sciences, and psychology, with a descriptive analytical research specification. Data were obtained through field studies and literature reviews, then analyzed qualitatively. The novelty of this research lies in its specific examination of the legal and ethical implications of applying restorative justice in cases of child molestation by children, which have often been resolved through amicable agreements between parents without considering the best interests of the child victims. The findings of this research show that restorative justice has the potential to neglect the protection of victims and the enforcement of justice, as well as eliminate the legal responsibility of the child perpetrator. The conclusion of this study confirms that the application of restorative justice in cases of child molestation by children is not in line with applicable legal provisions and has the potential to cause injustice, so it is not appropriate to apply it given its serious impact on the psychological condition and future of the child victim.