Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.182
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Yustitiabelen Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikes Indonesian Journal of Law and Society IBLAM Law Review JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Mohammad Alvi Pratama
Pasundan University, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
A Theory of Legal Personhood by Visa A.J. Kurki Mohammad Alvi Pratama; Eva Laila Rizkiyah
Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Decolonization, Legal Pluralism, and Human Rights (In Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ijls.v3i1.28220

Abstract

The article is a book review that supposedly does not need an abstract.
Fondasi Ecological-Philosophy dengan Model Place-Based Education untuk Clinical Legal Education Mohammad Alvi Pratama; Virly Vidiasti Sabijanto; Eva Laila Rizkiyah
Yustitiabelen Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Januari, 2022
Publisher : Universitas Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36563/yustitiabelen.v8i1.491

Abstract

Human misdeeds and the absence of legislative acknowledgement of environmental integrity cause environmental devastation. Historically, anthropocentric views of law have resulted in laws that serve as instruments to tame and manage nature, with nature existing solely as a means to an end: human welfare (in terms of human rights). As a legal instrument, it might be considered a natural legitimacy that destroys the environment, particularly via anthropocentric power relations. Environmental law is still biased in favor of human wellbeing rather than ecological integrity. As a result of this study, it is necessary to design an extra learning model for Clinical Legal Education (CLE) based on the Ecological Philosophy paradigm that supports the Deep Ecology perspective with the Pedagogy of Place-Based Education (PBE) Model. This study uses a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach to highlight the situation and legal requirements. The outcomes of this study indicate that the prevalence of the anthropocentric paradigm in law results in clinical legal education that is similarly anthropocentrically constrained. Connectivity while activity exists solely between humans. Therefore, CLE requires one more model to be liberated. The PBE paradigm successfully connects humans with their ecological surroundings. This relationship must adhere to the ecological paradigm. Therefore, the ecological philosophy foundation supplied can enhance students' environmental consciousness. So that in clinical legal education activities, students are ecologically aware and may encourage access to environmental justice.
Optimalisasi Paradigma Informed Consent dari to Disclose Menuju to Understand Sebagai Penghormatan Individual Autonomy Mohammad Alvi Pratama; Ahnav Bil Aufaq; Rr. Yudiswara Ayu Permatasari
Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan SUARA FORIKES Vol 13, No 4 (2022): Oktober 2022
Publisher : FORIKES

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33846/sf13423

Abstract

The world of health continues to develop, not only focusing on the growth of science, but also relating to the treatment of patients, one of which is informed consent which requires explanation by medical personnel in advance regarding the information needed and enlightens patients so they can consider decisions to be taken rationally. So we need research that aims to determine the achievement of adequate information in the process of informed consent. This research was an analytic descriptive study. The results obtained were dependent on the burden given, namely on the patient's authority. Authority gives patients the right to pull back on optimizing the goals of informed consent. It was found that the knowledge possessed by the patient is closely related to the decision to be determined regarding informed consent. Therefore, the limits of patient knowledge about informed consent also depend entirely on the patient's beliefs and knowledge, so that no matter how optimal the efforts to enlighten knowledge carried out by medical personnel are still unable to measure the depth of knowledge of each patient and of course this is also supported by time constraints. as well as the pace of development of medical science.Keywords: informed consent; paternalism; principle of autonomy ABSTRAK Dunia kesehatan terus berkembang, tidak hanya menitikberatkan pada pertumbuhan ilmu pengetahuan, tetapi juga berkaitan dengan penanganan terhadap pasien yang salah satunya adalah informed consent yang membutuhkan penjelasan oleh tenaga medis terlebih dahulu mengenai informasi yang dibutuhkan dan mencerahkan pasien agar dapat mempertimbangkan keputusan yang akan diambil secara rasional. Maka diperlukan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui pencapaian adequate information dalam proses informed consent. Penelitian ini merupakan studi deskriptif analitik. Hasil yang didapat adalah bergantung terhadap beban yang diberikan yakni pada otoritas pasien. Otoritas memberi pasien hak yang dapat menarik ulur optimalisasi tujuan dari informed consent. Ditemukan bahwa pengetahuan yang dimiliki pasien berkaitan erat dengan keputusan yang akan ditentukan berkaitan dengan informed consent. Oleh karena itu, batasan pengetahuan pasien tentang informed consent juga bergantung sepenuhnya kepada keyakinan serta pengetahuan pasien, sehingga seoptimal apapun upaya mencerahkan pengetahuan yang dilakukan oleh tenaga medis masih tidak dapat menakar kedalaman pengetahuan dari masing-masing pasien dan tentu hal tersebut juga didukung oleh keterbatasan waktu serta laju perkembangan ilmu medis.Kata kunci: informed consent; paternalisme; prinsip otonomi
Kompromi Etis dalam AI Generatif Memetakan Konflik Nilai Keadilan, Transparansi, dan Utilitas Pratama, Mohammad Alvi
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 02 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v5i02.700

Abstract

Kemajuan dalam Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif (Generative AI) telah menimbulkan kekhawatiran etika yang signifikan, terutama dalam menyeimbangkan nilai-nilai utama seperti keadilan, transparansi, dan manfaat (utilitas). Semakin banyaknya implementasi sistem AI generatif dalam berbagai aplikasi, menjadi sangat penting untuk menangani dilema etika yang muncul dari trade-off yang inheren di antara prinsip-nilai tersebut. Sistem AI generatif sering kali menghadapi trade-off etika di mana kebutuhan peningkatan satu nilai, seperti keadilan, dapat menyebabkan kompromi pada nilai lain, seperti transparansi atau manfaat. Misalnya, usaha untuk membuat model AI lebih transparan dapat mengurangi efisiensi kinerjanya, sementara optimasi kemanfaatan menimbulkan masalah bias dan ketidakadilan. Trade-off ini bukan hanya persoalan teknis, tetapi juga merupakan dilema etika mendasar yang mempengaruhi kepercayaan, akuntabilitas, dan penerimaan masyarakat terhadap sistem AI. Kurangnya pemahaman yang komprehensif tentang trade-off ini dan tidak adanya strategi praktis untuk mengelolanya menimbulkan risiko signifikan terhadap penerapan AI generatif yang etis dan bertanggung jawab. Oleh karena itu, tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan kerangka kerja yang secara efektif menyeimbangkan trade-off etika dalam sistem AI generatif, dengan fokus khusus pada nilai-nilai tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan multi-metode, yang menggabungkan analisis kritis dan penelitian kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa trade-off etika dalam AI generatif sangat bergantung pada konteks dan sangat bervariasi di berbagai aplikasi. Sebagai contoh, dalam beberapa kasus, peningkatan transparansi dapat secara signifikan mengurangi kemanfaatan, sementara di kasus lain, upaya untuk memastikan keadilan dapat menyebabkan penurunan kinerja model. Hasil ini menekankan kebutuhan akan pendekatan yang fleksibel dan sensitif terhadap konteks dalam mengelola trade-off ini, daripada solusi satu ukuran untuk semua.
ECOSOPHY FOUNDATION WITH PLACE-BASED EDUCATION MODEL CLINICAL LEGAL EDUCATION Pratama, Mohammad Alvi; Rizkiyah, Eva Laila
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i2.78

Abstract

Environmental destruction arises as a result of human wickedness and the absence of legislative acknowledgement of environmental integrity. Historically, the anthropocentric conception of law resulted in legislation serving as a tool for taming and othering nature, with nature existing only as a means to an end: human wellbeing (in terms of human rights). As a legal tool, it might be regarded as natural legitimacy degrading the environment, particularly through anthropocentric power relations, in the name of developing a risk management measuring tool that does not safeguard, but rather perpetuates, this ecological business. If the law remains dominated by an anthropocentric perspective, it will continue to be a mechanism for promoting and legitimizing environmental destruction; environmental law is still biased in favor of human wellbeing, not ecological integrity. As a result of this research, it is important to develop a additional learning model for CLE, one that is based on the Ecosophy (Ecological Philosophy) paradigm, which underpins the Deep Ecology perspective with Pedagogy Place Based Education (PBE). This is a qualitative descriptive-analytical method for expressing the legal situation & needs. The study’s findings indicate that the predominance of anthropocentric perspectives in law, particularly in determining the personality of legal subjects who are exclusively human and human interests (such as companies), must be reinterpreted. This perspective establishes the role of law as a way of taming and othering nature, and more precisely, as a means of instrumentalizing and legitimizing environmental destruction under the guise of exploiting nature. Humans are, philosophically speaking, a component of the ecology. Human equality with nature is consistent with Deep Ecology beliefs. Thus, the expansion of the personality of legal subjects to include non-humans ensures that they receive their rights and are classified as vulnerable groups. Deep Ecology can be used to demonstrate that this PBE model for CLE must have a non-anthropocentric perspective and be more open-minded through the Ecosophy education model: PBE, in order for students to critically and empathetically see the world from a deep-holistic perspective, that vulnerable groups are not limited to humans, but also include nature. This understanding will result in law students who become environmental activists, ensuring that the future of law recognizes environmental integrity and does not justify environmental destruction.
DIGITALISASI PENDIDIKAN HUKUM Susanto, Anthon F.; Septianita, Hesti; Tedjabuana, Rosa; Pratama, Mohammad Alvi
LITIGASI Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v23i2.6216

Abstract

The world has changed into a reality engineered through logic digital known as artificial intelligence. When the intelligence develops in rapid fashion into conscience like human, the potential game, website and other network and digital facility will drastically be increasing. Methods used is a participative-mixed method model of research with four approaches which are philosophical, conceptual, socio-legal and textual-critique approaches with literature study data collecting technique. In this era of artificial intelligence, legal education should be reborn with new face, education with commitment to respond digital development without ignoring the value of wisdom. Legal education will lead to the development of practical skill and is based on values of wisdom. Legal education should establish cultural-based curriculum as legal education is an education of behavior. Legal education should be adapted with global values but paying attention to local aspects or on the other hand maintaining rational education and constructing sense of logic and retaining good practical skill and the concern to marginalized community. That is what future legal education should be. Keywords: Digitalization, Artificial Intelligence, Legal Education.
Menafsir Ulang Persetujuan: Analisis Filosofis atas Syarat Substantif, Epistemis, dan Volisional Consent Pratama, Mohammad Alvi
JOM Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v6i4.9058

Abstract

Consent is a fundamental normative concept in moral and social life, yet its complexity is often overlooked in everyday understanding. This article aims to philosophically examine the nature of consent as a normative power capable of transforming actions that were previously impermissible into permissible ones, while also analyzing the conditions that must be fulfilled for consent to be considered valid. This study employs a conceptual analysis method based on a literature review, examining major works in contemporary moral philosophy that discuss theories of consent. The analysis demonstrates that consent cannot be understood merely as an expression of individual will; rather, it functions as a normative mechanism that transforms the moral status of an action. However, its validity depends on the fulfillment of several crucial conditions: substantive conditions related to the nature of the action being consented to; epistemic conditions requiring adequate knowledge and understanding; volitional conditions ensuring freedom from coercion; and contextual conditions that take into account power relations and the surrounding social structures. Based on these findings, the article argues that consent constitutes a limited normative power, since its validity can only be recognized when these four conditions are fulfilled simultaneously.
Co-Authors Ahnav Bil Aufaq Anthon F. Susanto, Anthon F. Eva Laila Rizkiyah Eva Laila Rizkiyah Rizkiyah, Eva Laila Rr. Yudiswara Ayu Permatasari Septianita, Hesti Tedjabuana, Rosa Virly Vidiasti Sabijanto