Irwan Hafid
Universitas Islam Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Penegakan Hukum Mahar Politik dalam Pilpres 2019 Ditinjau dari Politik Hukum Pidana Irwan Hafid; Dendy Prasetyo Nugroho
Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu
Publisher : Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.689 KB) | DOI: 10.55108/jap.v2i2.27

Abstract

The issue of political dowry, relatively, becomes a sustainable warning of problems in every general election in Indonesia. Such as the issue of Sandiaga Uno, who provided political dowry in the 2019 presidential election. The allegation was started by the Deputy of General-secretary of the Party of Democrat, Andi Arief, who stated that Sandiaga Uno had provided 500 billion rupiahs to PAN and PKS respectively so that those two parties would support him to nominate as the Candidate of Vice President for Prabowo Subianto. Political dowry has been a serious issue and almost constantly becomes an interesting topic to be reported and studied in every general election. Although it is popular, the issue of political dowry is a case that is relatively difficult to prove its truth (court decisions). In fact, explicitly, political dowry has been regulated in Article 228 on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning the General Election (Election Law). However, it does not expressly provide a deterrent effect to the political dowry actors. This reality becomes the basis of encouragement in conducting this research. The theory used in this research is legal politics and law enforcement. While the method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The output of this paper is that the handling of political dowry cases in the presidential election needs a serious concern. And then, the regulation on sanctions, which still be administrative in nature, against the actors of political dowry in the Election Law is considered to be inappropriate. So that criminal policy is needed to strengthen the law enforcement and strict legal instruments against criminal acts of political dowry in the future election (ius constituendum).
Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation Mahrus Ali; Irwan Hafid; Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 13, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a23606

Abstract

Introduction to The Problem:  The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizens’ civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights.Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approachesFindings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.Paper Type: Research Article
KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL DALAM MENGATASI KAMPANYE HITAM (BLACK CAMPAIGN) DI MEDIA SOSIAL Irwan Hafid
Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Menakar Problematika Pilkada 2020
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (482.936 KB) | DOI: 10.55108/jbk.v2i1.233

Abstract

Misuse of social media during the election campaign is one thing that needs serious attention. In addition to promising various facilities, social media is also an effective means to commit a crime, such as the spread of hoax and black campaigns. That reality would be the basis for this writing. The theory used in this research is criminal policy theory and campaigns on socialmedia. While the method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The output of this paper is that the issue of legislation and coordination becomes a problem in the regulation of campaigns on social media. Therefore, this must be overcome through the efforts of penal and non-penal as part of criminal policy.
UPAYA PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PARTAI POLITIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMILIHAN UMUM Irwan Hafid
Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Electoral Justice Pada Pemilu 2024
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (360.015 KB) | DOI: 10.55108/jbk.v3i2.260

Abstract

Sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia mengatur bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana partai politik yang melakukan tindakpidana dapat dikenakan kepada korporasi, pengurus, atau pengurus sekaligus korporasinya. Dalam praktik tindak pidana pemilihan umum (pemilu), hingga saat ini belum ada partai politik yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana sebagai korporasi, kecuali terhadap politisi atau pengurusnya. Praktik ini dinilai belum cukup mencerminkan nilai-nilai keadilan dalam upaya penyelesaian pelanggaran pemilu, karena partai politik juga berpotensidapat menikmati keuntungan dari terjadinya tindak pidana pemilu. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif, yakni dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji atau menganalisis data sekunder berupa bahan hukum, terutama bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa kendala dalam mempertanggungjawabkan partai politik secara pidana,diantaranya pertarungan ideologis antara kepentingan hukum pidana melawan politik, distorsi penegakan hukum melaluipembentukan undang-undang, hingga kooptasi partai politik terhadap institusi penegak hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukankebijakan hukum pidana dalam upaya untuk mempertanggungjawabkan pidana partai politik sebagai subjek delik (korporasi/badan hukum) dalam tindak pidana pemilu kedepan.