Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

LEGAL PROTECTION EFFORTS BY NOTARIES IN BACKDOOR LISTING PRACTICES AS CORPORATE ACTIONS IN THE CAPITAL MARKET Hafidah Nur Epsteinnia; Dona Budi Kharisma; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21387099

Abstract

Backdoor listing is a method used by companies to enter the capital market without going through the lengthy and costly initial public offering (IPO) process. This practice typically involves the acquisition of a public company by a private company, allowing the private company to be listed on the stock exchange through the acquired public company. One of the main requirements for listing shares on the stock exchange is that the business must be a limited liability company. In this context, notaries play a crucial role in ensuring legality and compliance with applicable regulations. Legal protection for notaries in backdoor listing practices is crucial given the complexity and potential legal risks involved. Notaries must ensure that all documents and processes related to backdoor listing comply with the Limited Liability Company Law (UUPT), the Capital Market Law (UUPM), and other relevant regulations. However, due to the lack of detailed legal regulations regarding backdoor listing in Indonesia, notaries must exercise caution and ensure that every step taken complies with applicable legal principles.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku UMKM yang Tidak Mencantumkan Tanggal Kedaluwarsa pada Produk Makanan Kemasan Miftakhul Janah; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Januari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5338

Abstract

In the current of globalization, MSMEs are increasingly developing with a variety of attractive packaged food products. However, some business actors have not yet realized the importance of including information on the packaging, especially the expiration date. The absence of this information can harm consumers because consumers do not know whether the product is still suitable for consumption. This study aims to determine the legal responsibility of MSME actors who do not include an expiration date on packaged food products. This study uses a normative juridical approach method. The results of the study show that to ensure the quality and safety of food circulating in the community, business actors are required to comply with applicable regulations, including the inclusion of product information labels, especially the expiration date. If food products are distributed without such labels, business actors can be subject to sanctions for intentional or negligent actions. Article 3 paragraph (2) of PP No. 69 of 1999 stipulates that food labels must include the expiration date, month, and year. If ignored, business actors are subject to administrative sanctions such as written warnings, distribution bans, product recalls, destruction, production cessation, a maximum fine of 50 million rupiah, and even revocation of business permits. In addition, Article 8 paragraph (1) letter g in conjunction with Article 62 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1999 states that violations of the obligation to include an expiration date can be subject to a maximum prison sentence of 5 years/a maximum fine of 2 billion rupiah as a form of legal protection for consumers.
Penyalahgunaan Wewenang oleh Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pengalihan Hak atas Tanah Tanpa Izin Pemilik: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 379 K/Pid/2021 Ulung Ajubah Tri Atmojo; Sapto Hermawan; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 9 (2026): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i9.3755

Abstract

Notaries hold attributive authority to draft authentic deeds, yet the Notary Law does not clearly delineate administrative violations from criminal liability, creating a normative gap. This legal issue is analyzed through Supreme Court Decision Number 379 K/Pid/2021 concerning a land-rights-transfer deed made without the owner's consent. This normative-juridical, descriptive-analytical research applies statute, conceptual and case approaches. The findings show that the abuse of authority occurred in the substance, procedure and public-office dimensions of the notarial function, producing tripartite legal consequences in civil, criminal and administrative law. Amending the Notary Law to formulate explicit intent-based parameters is proposed as a solution to close this normative gap.