Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.663
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Yustisia Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Hasanuddin Law Review Varia Justicia Jambura Law Review Competitive Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Jurnal Idiomatik: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Community Empowerment Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pengabdian Masyarakat Yuridika Al-Irsyad Journal of Physics Education Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Journal Education and Government Wiyata Journal of Citizen Research and Development Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Computer & Science Industrial Engineering Journal
ANGGIA PUTRI
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REFORM

 1 
The Indonesian Constitutional Court Approaches the Proportionality Principle to the Cases Involving Competing Rights Lailam, Tanto; Anggia, Putri
LAW REFORM Vol 19, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i1.54087

Abstract

The research focuses on the proportionality analysis of the competing socio-economic rights in the Indonesian Constitutional Court / Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (the MKRI). It is motivated by the unclear concept/model of proportionality analysis in Indonesia and its application by the court. The research method used was normative legal research with statutory and case approaches. The MKRI's general practices need to be more structured, unsystematized, and uncomprehensive to implement with four stages: legitimate aims, suitability, necessity, and balancing. It applies a model that refers to the legal objectives based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. It declares the balance of fundamental rights and obligations of citizens based on the values of the godhead, humanity, unity, democracy, and social justice. Hence, some decisions used proportionality analysis, specifically in economic rights. Its implications create a balance of legal norms and integratively value legal certainty, justice, and legal expediency.
Co-Authors A, Amelianda Afliza, Nur Agustina, Ade Ani Yunita Aprilia, Dinda Baehaqi Chakim, M. Luthfi Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni Fitriyanti, Fadia Ginting, Dina Gultom, Angel Paskah Hasibuan, Sabrina Rahma Belisa Hutagalung, Sintya Pretty Jumrah Jumrah Kaban, Ester Susmaita Kie, Yongky Malau, Sthevy Nadeak, Santaro Nanda Nanda Nasrullah, Nasrullah Nugroho, Avianto Pardosi, Dino Pulungan, Nailah Rajagukguk, G. Emma Sembiring, Dear Sianturi, Refin Yusnita Octavia Siburian, Catherina Silalahi, Artha Uli Silalahi, Sania Sari Simbolon, Nagita Hana Prathami Sitanggang, Bunga Sitanggang, Vember Tri Rejeki Sitanggang Sitepu, Dori Betsaida Br Sitorus, Cristina Sitorus Sunarno Sunarno Tanto Lailam Wasiaturrahma, Wasiaturrahma Wirman, Wirman Yudhi, Achmad