Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesia Private Law Review Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan
Ahsan Yunus
Universitas Hasanuddin
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
RELASI NEGARA DAN AGAMA DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH BERNUANSA SYARIAH: PERSPEKTIF PANCASILA Farida Patittingi; Irwansyah Irwansyah; Muhammad Hasrul; Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra; Ahsan Yunus
Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 2021: VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2021
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52738/pjk.v1i1.1

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan evaluasi Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten EnrekangNomor 5 Tahun 2005 tentang Pandai Baca Al-Qur’an dan relevansinya terhadap nilai-nilaiPancasila. Penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan menggunakanpendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan analitis. Hasilpenelitian menunjukkan bahwa indikator nilai dalam Pancasila, jika dikontekstualisasikandengan Peraturan Daerah tentang Pandai Baca Al-Qur’an di Kabupaten Enrekang, terdapatbeberapa indikator yang tidak sejalan, bahkan dapat dikatakan cenderung bernuansadiskriminatif. Perda yang diterbitkan pada suatu daerah tidak boleh mengatur untuk 1 (satu)golongan saja, namun harus mampu menjangkau seluruh lapisan masyarakat tanpa mengenalperbedaan suku, agama, ras, dan golongan. Dapat pula dikatakan tidak memberikan keadilansecara lahir maupun batin terhadap pemeluk agama Islam oleh sebab adanya beberapapenambahan persyaratan pada wilayah-wilayah tertentu. Terdapat ketentuan sanksi yang dapatmenggugurkan pemeluk agama Islam untuk berkompetisi pada sektor tertentu.
ASSESSING THE EVIDENTIARY POWER: NOTARIZED AUTOPSY REPORTS VERSUS VISUM ET REPERTUM Marwah Marwah; Anwar Borahima; Ahsan Yunus; Alya Saphira; Santy Kouwagam
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v6i2.4536

Abstract

In cases of murder or suspicious death, an autopsy reports serve as crucial evidence in criminal adjudication. Based on Indonesian criminal procedural law, a Visum et Repertum issued by an authorized forensic doctor is legally recognized as expert evidence for determining the cause, manner, and circumstances of death. In the case examined, both the Visum et Repertum and the testimony of a general practitioner who observed the autopsy process, subsequently legalized by a notary, were submitted as evidence in criminal proceedings. This study examines the normative ambiguity between criminal procedural law and notarial law, particularly regarding the evidentiary status of a general practitioner’s testimony concerning autopsy observations that is subsequently legalized by a notary. This research uses a normative legal analysis, drawing on statutory and conceptual approaches, to analyze the framework of criminal procedural law, regulations governing medical practice, and the juridical limits of notarial authority. The findings confirm that submitting a general practitioner’s testimony on autopsy observations, even when legalized by a notary, does not create a conflict of norms. Instead, it constitutes a misapplication of evidentiary principles. A Visum et Repertum, prepared by a duly authorized forensic physician, possesses definitive evidentiary authority as it is issued within statutory mandate. By contrast, the testimony of a general practitioner, even if notarized, lacks the legal force to constitute valid evidence, as notaries are not authorized to legitimize forensic medical findings. This article clarifies that notarizing autopsy observations does not create normative conflict, but reflects a misapplication of evidentiary authority in criminal procedure.
Co-Authors Alya Saphira Anwar Borahima Hasrul, Muhammad Irwansyah Irwansyah Marwah Marwah Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra Patittingi, Farida Santy Kouwagam