Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SINTEK JURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin Turbo : Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Mesin Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknoka Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Multitek Indonesia : Jurnal Ilmiah KOMPUTEK Pilar Teknologi : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Teknik JURPIKAT (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Arifin, Rizal
Faculty Of Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo 63471
Religion Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Dentistry Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisa Penggunaan K-Gram pada Karakter, Kata dan Kalimat untuk Mendeteksi Kesamaan Dokumen Ida Widaningrum; Dyah Mustikasari; Rizal Arifin; Erika Diyah Cahyani
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknoka Vol 5 (2020): Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknoka ke - 5
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The use of digital technology is now a necessity; one of its components is documents. Similarity detection can use a variety of methods, including the fingerprinting method. Fingerprint has a working principle using hashing techniques and K-gram. This research is focused on the detection model using Kgram using the winnowing algorithm and python as a programming language. The k-gram parsing test uses 5 k pieces, namely k = 2 k = 3 k = 4 k = 5 k = 6. As a result, the character parsing gets a larger percentage than the manual character percentage. The percentage of word parsing has the closest percentage of the manual percentage. while in sentences, the percentage is the lowest than the manual percentage.
Co-Authors Agung Purniawan Aldo Asmoro Anisa Sri Janatin Asrining Wulandari Bayu Aji Saputra Cobantoro, Adi Fajaryanto Deviardia Putri Nurmayasari Dyah Mustikasari Edy Kurniawan Erika Diyah Cahyani Evi Zulfa Aidha Putri Fadelan Fadelan Fahrudin Kurniawan Ghulam Asrofi Buntoro Ida Widaningrum, Ida Indah Puji Astuti Kuntang Winangun Lia Setiyani M. Malyad Muhammad Arif Khaidir Muhammad Malyadi Munaji Munaji Nanda Artia Ningrum Nina Alfiana Septien Tri Cahyono Sumarwan Syaiful Mahfud Abdulloh Wahyu Aditya Rohman Wawan Trisnadi Putra Yeossy Sufitri Yoyok Winardi Zulkham Umar Rosyidin