Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Jambura Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Taufiq El Rahman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
STATUS KEPEMILIKAN DAN PEMANFAATAN TANAH GRONDKAART DI STASIUN DEPOK BARU, LENTENG AGUNG, DAN TANJUNG BARAT Sulistiowati, Sulistiowati; Ismail, Nurhasan; Rahman, Taufiq El
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The disputes over land ownership and utilization of Grondkaart for Railway activities between the government and PT KAI should not have occurred due to both having the same vested interest for the state. However, the reality shown that land ownership dan agreement status on land use with the third party. Through the qualitative analysis, the research findings: First, land originating from Grondkaart at the location still belongs to the goverment due to the land still holding the status of the right to use or Hak Pakai during the course of the time the land used by the Government and the land participation as a capital in PT KAI before the process of handling the right of land ownership; Second, there is a difference in the legalty of the land use agreement with a third party, namely the agreement made by PT KAI that does not fulfill 2 (two) legal requirements within the agreement, namely the ability to act and on the agreement and the legality of the clauses, meanwhile the agreement taht should be enacted by the government should fulfill all the valid requirements of the agreement.
Legal Challenges of the Application of the Right to Be Forgotten in Blockchain in Indonesia and the European Union Putri, Uni Tsulasi; Nurhayati, Irna; Rahman, Taufiq El
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30514

Abstract

The Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF), as enshrined in data protection laws under Article 8 of the Indonesia’s Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) and Article 17 of the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), grants individuals the right to request the deletion of personal data. However, this principle is fundamentally at odds with blockchain’s immutability, which ensures that once recorded, data cannot be altered or erased. This study examines the legal conflict between RTBF and blockchain through a doctrinal and comparative legal analysis of Indonesia and the EU regulatory framework. This study employs a normative legal research approach, utilizing doctrinal analysis and comparative legal method to examine statutory provisions, case law, and scholarly literature of Indonesia and the EU on the conflict between the RTBF and blockchain technology. Findings reveal that both jurisdictions struggle to reconcile RTBF enforcement with blockchain’s technical architecture, particularly in public networks. While the EU possesses stronger institutional maturity, it lacks clear jurisprudential direction on blockchain-based RTBF cases. Indonesia, with its evolving legal landscape, shows potential for flexible reinterpretation of “data destruction” under Article 44 of the PDP Law. The paper proposes a normative shift interpretation from the right to absolute erasure of the data itself toward the right to cryptographic erasure which supported by hybrid legal-technical solutions such as key deletion, off-chain storage, and permissioned blockchains.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITUR AKIBAT SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG TERDEGRADASI SEBAGAI AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN Gusriadi, Gusriadi; Rahman, Taufiq El
Jurnal Hukum Vol 37, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jh.37.2.134-154

Abstract

This study has two (2) objectives, first to analyze the legal consequences of the Power of Attorney to Charge for the Right of Land Mortgage (SKMHT) which has been relegated into privately made deed and used as a requirement to create a Mortgage Deed (APHT) that was registered to National Land Authority of Bantul Regency. The second objective is to analyze the legal protection of creditor against SKMHT which has been relegated into privately made deed. As a result, that APHT made based on SKMHT was not issue as a violation of the subjective and objective conditions for the validity of the agreement and the principle of freedom of contract, resulting in APHT being null and void. A form of internal legal protection given back to the principal agreement, i.e. a credit agreement made by the parties. External legal protection is legal protection provided by legislation, namely provided by Article 1131 and Article 1132 of the Civil Code, namely as holders of general guarantees known as concurrent creditors or conducting credit restructuring as an effort to save credit. Penelitian ini memiliki 2 (dua) tujuan. Pertama, yakni untuk menganalisis konsekuensi hukum terhadap SKMHT yang terdegradasi menjadi akta dibawah tangan dan telah ditindaklanjuti pembuatan APHT serta didaftarkan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Bantul. Tujuan yang kedua adalah untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur akibat SKMHT yang terdegradasi sebagai akta dibawah tangan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa APHT yang dibuat berdasarkan SKMHT tidak melanggar syarat subjektif dan syarat objektif sahnya perjanjian dan asas kebebasan berkontrak sehingga mengakibatkan APHT menjadi batal demi hukum. Kedua, perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur meliputi perlindungan hukum internal dan eksternal. Secara internal, perlindungan hukum diberikan oleh perjanjian pokoknya, yaitu perjanjian kredit, dan secara eksternal, perlindungan hukum diberikan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yaitu diberikan oleh Pasal 1131 dan Pasal 1132 KUHPerdata yakni sebagai pemegang jaminan umum yang dikenal sebagai kreditur konkuren atau melakukan restrukturisasi kredit sebagai upaya penyelamatan kredit.
Co-Authors Ari Hernawan Gusriadi, Gusriadi Irna Nurhayati Murti Pramuwardhani Dewi Ninik Darmini Nurhasan Ismail Putri, Uni Tsulasi R. A. Antari Innaka Sulistiowati Sulistiowati