Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jambura Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Taufiq El Rahman
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
STATUS KEPEMILIKAN DAN PEMANFAATAN TANAH GRONDKAART DI STASIUN DEPOK BARU, LENTENG AGUNG, DAN TANJUNG BARAT Sulistiowati, Sulistiowati; Ismail, Nurhasan; Rahman, Taufiq El
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The disputes over land ownership and utilization of Grondkaart for Railway activities between the government and PT KAI should not have occurred due to both having the same vested interest for the state. However, the reality shown that land ownership dan agreement status on land use with the third party. Through the qualitative analysis, the research findings: First, land originating from Grondkaart at the location still belongs to the goverment due to the land still holding the status of the right to use or Hak Pakai during the course of the time the land used by the Government and the land participation as a capital in PT KAI before the process of handling the right of land ownership; Second, there is a difference in the legalty of the land use agreement with a third party, namely the agreement made by PT KAI that does not fulfill 2 (two) legal requirements within the agreement, namely the ability to act and on the agreement and the legality of the clauses, meanwhile the agreement taht should be enacted by the government should fulfill all the valid requirements of the agreement.
Legal Challenges of the Application of the Right to Be Forgotten in Blockchain in Indonesia and the European Union Putri, Uni Tsulasi; Nurhayati, Irna; Rahman, Taufiq El
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30514

Abstract

The Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF), as enshrined in data protection laws under Article 8 of the Indonesia’s Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) and Article 17 of the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), grants individuals the right to request the deletion of personal data. However, this principle is fundamentally at odds with blockchain’s immutability, which ensures that once recorded, data cannot be altered or erased. This study examines the legal conflict between RTBF and blockchain through a doctrinal and comparative legal analysis of Indonesia and the EU regulatory framework. This study employs a normative legal research approach, utilizing doctrinal analysis and comparative legal method to examine statutory provisions, case law, and scholarly literature of Indonesia and the EU on the conflict between the RTBF and blockchain technology. Findings reveal that both jurisdictions struggle to reconcile RTBF enforcement with blockchain’s technical architecture, particularly in public networks. While the EU possesses stronger institutional maturity, it lacks clear jurisprudential direction on blockchain-based RTBF cases. Indonesia, with its evolving legal landscape, shows potential for flexible reinterpretation of “data destruction” under Article 44 of the PDP Law. The paper proposes a normative shift interpretation from the right to absolute erasure of the data itself toward the right to cryptographic erasure which supported by hybrid legal-technical solutions such as key deletion, off-chain storage, and permissioned blockchains.
Co-Authors Ari Hernawan Irna Nurhayati Murti Pramuwardhani Dewi Ninik Darmini Nurhasan Ismail Putri, Uni Tsulasi R. A. Antari Innaka Sulistiowati Sulistiowati