Putri, Uni Tsulasi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Potensi Desa Murtigading Menuju Desa Wisata Eduecotourism di Kawasan Bantul Yogyakarta Susanti, Ani; Putri, Uni Tsulasi; Ardiansyah H, Noer; Robiana, Pramugara
Devotion: Journal Corner of Community Service Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : CV. Tripe Konsultan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1089.778 KB) | DOI: 10.54012/devotion.v1i2.96

Abstract

Terletak kurang lebih 2,5 km dari wilayah Pantai Goa Cemara, Desa Murtigading berpotensi untuk dikembangkan sebagai desa wisata berwawasan lingkungan dan edukasi berbasis komunitas (community-based Eduecotourism). Salah satu tujuan pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kesadaran mitra tentang potensi desa Murtigading. Metode yang dilakukan adalah observasi, FGD, pelatihan dan pendampingan khususnya kepada UMKM dan Pengelola BUMDes. Berdasarkan observasi dan FGD dengan komunitas yang ada di Murtigading, desa ini layak untuk dikembangkan. Atraksi alam dan sosial, aksesibilitas jalan, dan pendukung potensi wisata Pendampingan perlu dilakukan sehingga paket wisata edukatif dapat dikemas dengan lebih menarik dan dipromosikan secara lebih intensif.
Legal Challenges of the Application of the Right to Be Forgotten in Blockchain in Indonesia and the European Union Putri, Uni Tsulasi; Nurhayati, Irna; Rahman, Taufiq El
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30514

Abstract

The Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF), as enshrined in data protection laws under Article 8 of the Indonesia’s Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) and Article 17 of the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), grants individuals the right to request the deletion of personal data. However, this principle is fundamentally at odds with blockchain’s immutability, which ensures that once recorded, data cannot be altered or erased. This study examines the legal conflict between RTBF and blockchain through a doctrinal and comparative legal analysis of Indonesia and the EU regulatory framework. This study employs a normative legal research approach, utilizing doctrinal analysis and comparative legal method to examine statutory provisions, case law, and scholarly literature of Indonesia and the EU on the conflict between the RTBF and blockchain technology. Findings reveal that both jurisdictions struggle to reconcile RTBF enforcement with blockchain’s technical architecture, particularly in public networks. While the EU possesses stronger institutional maturity, it lacks clear jurisprudential direction on blockchain-based RTBF cases. Indonesia, with its evolving legal landscape, shows potential for flexible reinterpretation of “data destruction” under Article 44 of the PDP Law. The paper proposes a normative shift interpretation from the right to absolute erasure of the data itself toward the right to cryptographic erasure which supported by hybrid legal-technical solutions such as key deletion, off-chain storage, and permissioned blockchains.