Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Geuthee
Febrian Febrian
Universitas Sriwijaya
Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
HUKUMAN PELANGGAR KARANTINA ERA WABAH COVID-19 BERDASARKAN DUA REGULASI (STUDI KASUS WISMA ATLET JAKARTA) Senja Nasril; Nur Intan Akuntari; Febrian Febrian; Nashriana Nashriana
Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Geuthèë Institute, Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52626/jg.v5i1.133

Abstract

Sebagai negara yang mengalami wabah covid-19, Indonesia juga menerapkan regulasi dalam usaha untuk menekan tingkat penularan virus tersebut. Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan merupakan pengaturan yang telah disiapkan pemerintah sebagai wujud keseriusan menangani wabah covid-19. Pada tanggal 17 September 2021 kemarin, negara kita dikejutkan oleh pelanggaran karantina dengan mengabaikan kurun waktu karantina yang harus dijalani. Satgas covid-19 sangat memperhatikan masyarakat agar selalu memperketat penerapan protokol kesehatan, sebagai usaha untuk bisa terhindar dari bahaya covid-19. Maka itu, masyarkat Indonesia yang telah bepergian dari luar negeri diwajibkan untuk menjalani karantina dengan batas waktu yang telah ditetapkan. Persoalan yang dibahas dan di kajian ini yaitu bagaimana hukuman yang diberikan terhadap pelanggar karantina era wabah corona virus sesuai regulasi yang ada, seperti yang terjadi di Wisma Atlet Kebayoran Jakarta.
The Urgency of Reharmonization in Construction of The Stage Formation of Law M Jeffri Arlinandes Chandra; Febrian Febrian; Bayu Dwi Anggono
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22, No 3 (2022): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (748.167 KB) | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.311-324

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law that relies on a rule of law formed as a basic rule in the state and society. The law as the primary basis must be made following the principles of the Formation of good law so that it is expected that later it can be applied and has binding legal force for all levels of society. However, the current situation is far from the expectation of the formation of good law. For example, the Formation of a job creation law which is considered not to involve the community actively, many articles are contrary to legal principles, disharmonized and unsynchronized between law. The formation of law seems in a hurry so there are many errors in writing (typo) and many other things. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct the stages in making good law. This paper uses normative research with a statutory approach, a comparative approach, and finally concludes with a conceptual approach where concepts that are considered suitable can be applied in Indonesia. This article provides two conclusions. First, the practice of harmonization, synchronization and consolidation of conceptions that have been well implemented but only exist at the planning and drafting stages of the Bill. While after the discussion/mutual agreement (plenary), no further harmonization and synchronization are carried out. Second, the post-discussion (plenary) re-harmonization stage can provide space for the implementation of educational facilities, consultations and publications of pre-validation and enactment of law that will be ratified in the form of meaningful public participation
Co-Authors Bayu Dwi Anggono M Jeffri Arlinandes Chandra Nashriana Nashriana Nur Intan Akuntari Senja Nasril