Chepi Ali Firman Z
Faculty Of Law, Postgraduate Masters & Doctoral Program, Islamic University Of Bandung

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies

Penghentian Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Ringan melalui Penerapan Restorative Justice Dihubungkan dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan Namira Gupita Rakasiwi Aria; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.5043

Abstract

Abstract. Prison sanctions are excellent for law enforcement officials and problems in law enforcement in West Java, as a result of which the state budget swells for prisoners and the overcapacity of prison residents in the West Java region is a problem that needs to be addressed, this is in order to reconstruct new thinking in order to realize the goal of a more humanist punishment. The author examines the termination of prosecution of minor crimes through the application of restorative justice linked to the purpose of punishment with the aim of knowing and analyzing considerations for the application of restorative justice in minor crimes based on criminal law and to find out and analyze the juridical implications of restorative justice in Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice in the West Java High Prosecutor's Office. To achieve the above objectives, the author conducts descriptive research, which is to analyze and describe systematically, factually, and accurately the provisions related to Juridical implications regarding the termination of prosecution of minor criminal acts through the application of restorative justice. The type of research used is normative juridical using a statute approach. Data are obtained through the study of documents and analyzed using qualitative normative methods. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the consideration of stopping the prosecution of minor criminal cases in the West Java High Prosecutor's Office is a legal breakthrough in an effort to resolve criminal cases effectively based on the principles of balance, sense of justice, the principle of benefits and creating social welfare, The public prosecutor has the authority to stop prosecutions for the benefit of the victim and other protected legal interests in order to avoid negative stigma, avoidance of reprisals, response and harmony of society, and decency and public order by taking into account the principle of salus populi suprema lex which is meaningful "people's safety is the highest law" so the application of Restorative Justice is one of the appropriate solutions to reduce the capacity of prisoners from prisons in West Java. And the juridical implications of stopping the prosecution of minor criminal cases based on restorative justice show that the implementation mechanism has fulfilled the objectives of protecting human rights, the West Java High Prosecutor's Office And the juridical implications of stopping the prosecution of minor criminal cases based on restorative justice show that the implementation mechanism has fulfilled the objectives of protecting human rights, the West Java High Prosecutor's Office with its application puts forward the concept of restorative houses as a place for the peace process as well as a means of socialization to provide legal understanding to the community, Prosecutors have a strategic position and role in the law enforcement process within the framework of an integrated criminal justice system as a master of process or dominus litis whose one function is to screen a criminal case and determine whether or not a criminal case should be forwarded to the judiciary taking into account the purpose of the law. The paradigm of successful criminal law enforcement is no longer oriented as a means of retaliation, but rather the restoration of justice that does not focus on punishment. Abstrak. Sanksi pidana penjara menjadi primadona bagi aparat penegak hukum dan problematika dalam penegakan hukum (law enforcement) di Jawa Barat, akibatnya anggaran negara membengkak untuk narapidana dan over kapasitas penghuni lembaga pemasyarakatan di wilayah Jawa Barat menjadi permasalahan yang perlu ditanggulangi, hal ini dalam rangka merekonstruksi pemikiran baru guna mewujudkan tujuan pemidanaan yang lebih bersifat humanis. Penulis meneliti penghentian penuntutan tindak pidana ringan melalui penerapan restorative justice dihubungkan dengan tujuan pemidanaan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pertimbangan penerapan restorative justice dalam tindak pidana ringan berdasarkan hukum pidana serta untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis Implikasi yuridis restorative justice dalam Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif di Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Barat. Untuk mencapai tujuan di atas, penulis melakukan penelitian deskriptif, yaitu menganalisis dan menggambarkan secara sistematis, faktual, dan akurat ketentuan yang terkait Implikasi yuridis mengenai penghentian penuntutan tindak pidana ringan melalui penerapan keadilan restoratif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Data diperoleh melalui studi dokumen dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode normatif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diketahui bahwa pertimbangan penghentian penuntutan perkara tindak pidana ringan di Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Barat merupakan terobosan hukum dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara pidana yang efektif berlandaskan asas keseimbangan, rasa keadilan, asas manfaat dan menciptakan kesejahteraan sosial, penuntut umum berwenang menghentikan penuntutan demi kepentingan korban dan kepentingan hukum lain yang dilindungi demi menghindari stigma negatif, penghindaran pembalasan, respon dan keharmonisan masyarakat, serta kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum dengan memperhatikan asas salus populi suprema lex yang bermakna “keselamatan rakyat merupakan hukum tertinggi” maka penerapan Restorative Justice merupakan salah satu solusi yang tepat guna mengurangi jumlah kapasitas narapidana dari Lapas di Jawa Barat. Dan Implikasi yuridis penghentian penuntutan perkara tindak pidana ringan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif menunjukan bahwa mekanisme pelaksanaannya telah memenuhi tujuan perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia, Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Barat dengan penerapannya mengedepankan konsep rumah restoratif sebagai tempat proses perdamaian sekaligus sarana sosialisasi untuk memberikan pemahaman hukum kepada masyarakat, Jaksa memiliki posisi dan peran strategis dalam proses penegakan hukum dalam bingkai sistem peradilan pidana terpadu sebagai master of process atau dominus litis yang salah satu fungsinya menyaring sebuah perkara pidana dan menentukan perlu tidaknya sebuah perkara pidana diteruskan kepersidangan dengan mempertimbangkan tujuan hukum. Paradigma keberhasilan penegakan hukum pidana tidak lagi berorientasi sebagai sarana pembalasan, melainkan pemulihan keadilan yang tidak menitik beratkan pada penghukuman.
Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Eksploitasi Seksual Komersial Anak Dihubungkan dengan Asas Keadilan Alfiyanti Lestari Alyayudinda; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.5063

Abstract

Abstract. Law is used as a social control tool that can determine or regulate the behavior of society so as not to deviate from the rule of law. Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children is a new type of crime that is receiving attention in the world today, one of which is prostituted children defined as the use of girls and/or boys in sexual activities paid in cash or in kind. Law enforcers and the government have tried to deal with the crime of Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children through the rule of law and its enforcement, such as judges who are required to be skilled in applying the law and dare to take progressive actions to realize justice. The rise of child prostitution cases which ultimately need to be studied more comprehensively, such as what happened in Tangerang, as stated in the Tangerang District Court Decision Number 1145/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tng and the appeal decision of the Banten High Court Number 7/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn, can be said to be correct and not wrong in applying the law as stipulated in Article 193 Paragraph (1) of Criminal Code Procedure. However, when compared to the Padang District Court Decision Number 354/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pdg, the two decisions above in their considerations have ignored the legal principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis, so that justice in the judge's decision has not been oriented towards legal justice, moral justice, and social justice. Abstrak. Hukum dijadikan sebagai alat kontrol sosial (social control) yang dapat menetapkan atau mengatur tingkah laku masyarakat agar tidak menyimpang dari aturan hukum. Eksploitasi Seksual Komersial Anak (ESKA) merupakan suatu jenis kejahatan model baru yang sedang mendapat perhatian didunia saat ini, salah satunya prostitusi atau pelacuran anak didefinisikan sebagai pemakaian anak perempuan dan/atau anak laki-laki dalam kegiatan seksual yang dibayar dengan uang tunai atau dalam bentuk barang. Penegak hukum dan Pemerintah telah berupaya menangangani kejahatan Eksploitasi Seksual Komersial Anak melalui aturan hukum serta penegakannya, seperti Hakim yang dituntut terampil dalam menerapkan undang-undang dan berani melakukan tindakan progresif untuk mewujudkan keadilan. Masih maraknya kasus prostitusi anak yang pada akhirnya perlu dikaji lebih komperhensif seperti halnya yang terjadi di Tangerang, sebagaimana tercantum dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 1145/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tng dan putusan banding Pengadilan Tinggi Banten Nomor 7/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn, dapat dikatakan sudah tepat dan tidak salah dalam menerapkan hukum sebagaimana ketentuan hukum dalam Pasal 193 Ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Namun, apabila dibandingkan dengan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 354/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pdg bahwa kedua putusan diatas dalam pertimbangannya telah mengabaikan asas hukum Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis, sehingga keadilan dalam putusan hakim belum berorientasi pada pada keadilan hukum, keadilan moral, dan keadilan sosial.