Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Justitia et Pax Undang: Jurnal Hukum
Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Regulasi Pengakuan Hukum Negara Atas Tanah Yang Dikuasai/Dimiliki Oleh Masyarakat Hukum Adat: Relevan Bagi Papua Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol. 11 No. 2 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Volume 11, Nomor 2, Oktober 2014, ISSN 1412 - 7040
Publisher : Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to explain the particular arrangements and state recognition of customary rights (indigenous peoples' management control righst of the land where they live) in Indonesia. Two issues are addressed, firstly, whether the state recognition of the existence of customary law community is constitutive or merely declarative. Secondly, whether the scope of the recognition of the state covers just about the land or it also includes the natural resources attached to it. To address the above issues, this article explores the right of state to control customary rights on land as mandated in State Constitution 1945 and Basic Agrarian Law No.5/1960. In addition it also describes of how this concept of customary right on land lays foundations for managing natural resources such as gas and oil, forestry, as well as mining. It also connects to the long term goals of the state as mentioned in Law No.17/2007 regarding Long Term National Development Plan 2005-2025 and Law No.26/2007 regarding spatial arrangement plan (Rencana Tata Ruang). Those laws than finally is connected to Law No.2/2012 and Government Regulation No.71/2012 regarding the land acquisition for development activities and public interest, as well as land acquisition for private sector activities in the context of both domestic and foreign investment. Two conclusions are made, firstly, mimicking and imposing of legal system and development ideology from the parent state (NKRI) should be avoided. The challenge is how to bring the state (government of Papua) in charge and how to maintain the legitimacy of the presence of urbanized modern society (urban) in front of indigenous peoples. Secondly, the main problem is not how to develop regulation framework for better recognition of the customary law, but how modern capitalist economy should not harmful to the existing traditional community life.
IS THE LAW (POSSIBLY) DEAD OR CAN IT BE KILLED? OR HAS THE STATE FAILED/HAS IT BEEN ABSENT? Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI?
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (226.101 KB) | DOI: 10.12345/ius.v1i3.246

Abstract

Law is impossible to die, even if we can strangle it until limp. This questions appeared the possibility of killing the law by tracing the ideas about the law and the state that appears in the passage of time. What emerges is that the order or disorder always presupposes the emergence of law. Although it does not indicate whether the law appear fair or not. The fact is that people need a law although not necessarily requiring the State. Problems faced by Indonesia is now possible to be considered not as a matter of law, but the inability of the State  to present itself as something that is needed by the community.Keywords : Community, Emergence of  Law, Fairness
Pengembangan dan Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum Pertanian di Indonesia Tristam Pascal Moeliono; Koerniatmanto Soetoprawiro
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 3 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/ujh.3.2.409-440

Abstract

Agricultural law is an emerging specialized field in Indonesian legal discourse and the public as well as academics has yet to get acquainted with this new perspective. The importance of agricultural law should be placed in relation with the fact that the Indonesian government, even after more then 75 year of independence, did not seriously address the plight of peasants and fishermen, living in rural areas throughout Indonesia. Agricultural law as a perspective is developed to bring back the focus of national development to agriculture in its widest sense. The focus of analysis of this approach will be on policies and rules regarding agriculture and how it affects peasants-farmers working in informal-semi formal setting as well those working in the agroindustry and business. Other basic concepts employed relates to ecological-social justice, food sovereignty, security, and safety. Hopefully, this new approach to human development and agriculture may contribute to a better analysis of the plight of agriculture in Indonesia and how to improve this particular sector. Abstrak Hukum pertanian sebagai suatu kajian belum begitu dikenal dalam khasanah ilmu hukum Indonesia. Masyarakat umum, akademisi dan praktisi hukum masih harus berkenalan dengan pendekatan ini. Pentignya hukum pertanian harus ditempatkan dalam konteks kurangnya kepedulian rezim pemerintah Indonesia, bahkan dalam kurun waktu 75 tahun sejak merdeka, pada pembangunan sektor pertanian rakyat. Hukum pertanian merupakan satu upaya untuk mendorong kehidupan pertanian di Indonesia dan mayoritas masyarakat petani (bukan semata-mata perkebunan besar) menjadi bagian dari kehidupan modern yang manusiawi. Fokus kajian hukum pertanian adalah kebijakan dan aturan hukum yang diterbitkan pemerintah dari waktu ke waktu di bidang pertanian dalam arti luas yang bersentuhan dengan kehidupan petani-nelayan, mereka yang bekerja di sektor-sektor informal maupun semi formal sampai dengan agrobisnis dan industri. Sebagai titik tolak, digunakan konsep-konsep dasar keadilan sosial-ekologi, ketahanan-kedaulatan dan keamanan pangan. Salah satu sumbangan yang diharapkan adalah munculnya perspektif pemikiran dan solusi konstruksif yang baru untuk membangun manusia serta agrikultur dalam rangka menangani persoalan kemiskinan dan ketidakadilan sosial di Indonesia.
BAYANGAN AKAN BANGSA DALAM KONTEKS HAK UNTUK MENENTUKAN NASIB SENDIRI: SUATU WACANA Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2958

Abstract

Two issues shall be discussed: what is meant by people’s right to self determination and how has it been realized, also in the context of indigenous-tribal peoples. Analysis shall be done, by using a juridical doctrinal method. The purpose would go beyond explaining but also induce understanding of people’s right to self determination in the context of nation states. One determining faktor in the construction of a nation state is the emergence of an imagined solidarity between peoples from different races, tribes, or religious beliefs, being the result of suffering under colonialism. Notwithstanding that indigenous or tribal peoples may and in fact experience similar suffering under the state they are considered to be part of, international law, while recognizing their right to self determination, does not fully extend the same scope of rights to them.
Perbandingan Hukum antara Prinsip Habeas Corpus dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Inggris dengan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Ramsen Marpaung; Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 5, No 2 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (663.145 KB) | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v5i2.494

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis asal mula dan penerapan praperadilan dalam kaitannya dengan Habeas Corpus dan menelisik sejauh mana pranata hukum Habeas Corpus dari sistem peradilan pidana Inggris ini diadaptasikan ke dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia berpotensi berkembang menjadi malicious. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis penelitian perbandingan hukum melalui pendekatan perbandingan, pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan konseptual dengan menggunakan data sekunder dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan praperadilan yang ditransplantasikan dari Habeas Corpus tersebut telah menimbulkan banyak masalah, yang akhirnya beberapa masalah berkembang menjadi atau digunakan untuk sesuatu yang malicious, bahkan apabila dibiarkan, maka sesuatu yang malicious tersebut berpotensi memorak-porandakan sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Untuk mencegah hal itu terjadi, maka peran pemerintah diperlukan untuk mereformulasi pengaturan dan praktik praperadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.
Co-Authors Koerniatmanto Soetoprawiro Ramsen Marpaung