Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

0.817

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Justitia et Pax Undang: Jurnal Hukum Kosmik Hukum Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan

Tristam Pascal Moeliono

Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Author-ID : 3590562

Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Regulasi Pengakuan Hukum Negara Atas Tanah Yang Dikuasai/Dimiliki Oleh Masyarakat Hukum Adat: Relevan Bagi Papua Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol. 11 No. 2 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Volume 11, Nomor 2, Oktober 2014, ISSN 1412 - 7040
Publisher : Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The main purpose of this paper is to explain the particular arrangements and state recognition of customary rights (indigenous peoples' management control righst of the land where they live) in Indonesia. Two issues are addressed, firstly, whether the state recognition of the existence of customary law community is constitutive or merely declarative. Secondly, whether the scope of the recognition of the state covers just about the land or it also includes the natural resources attached to it. To address the above issues, this article explores the right of state to control customary rights on land as mandated in State Constitution 1945 and Basic Agrarian Law No.5/1960. In addition it also describes of how this concept of customary right on land lays foundations for managing natural resources such as gas and oil, forestry, as well as mining. It also connects to the long term goals of the state as mentioned in Law No.17/2007 regarding Long Term National Development Plan 2005-2025 and Law No.26/2007 regarding spatial arrangement plan (Rencana Tata Ruang). Those laws than finally is connected to Law No.2/2012 and Government Regulation No.71/2012 regarding the land acquisition for development activities and public interest, as well as land acquisition for private sector activities in the context of both domestic and foreign investment. Two conclusions are made, firstly, mimicking and imposing of legal system and development ideology from the parent state (NKRI) should be avoided. The challenge is how to bring the state (government of Papua) in charge and how to maintain the legitimacy of the presence of urbanized modern society (urban) in front of indigenous peoples. Secondly, the main problem is not how to develop regulation framework for better recognition of the customary law, but how modern capitalist economy should not harmful to the existing traditional community life.

IS THE LAW (POSSIBLY) DEAD OR CAN IT BE KILLED? OR HAS THE STATE FAILED/HAS IT BEEN ABSENT? Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI?
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Law is impossible to die, even if we can strangle it until limp. This questions appeared the possibility of killing the law by tracing the ideas about the law and the state that appears in the passage of time. What emerges is that the order or disorder always presupposes the emergence of law. Although it does not indicate whether the law appear fair or not. The fact is that people need a law although not necessarily requiring the State. Problems faced by Indonesia is now possible to be considered not as a matter of law, but the inability of the State to present itself as something that is needed by the community.Keywords : Community, Emergence of Law, Fairness

Pengembangan dan Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum Pertanian di Indonesia Tristam Pascal Moeliono; Koerniatmanto Soetoprawiro
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 3 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/ujh.3.2.409-440

Agricultural law is an emerging specialized field in Indonesian legal discourse and the public as well as academics has yet to get acquainted with this new perspective. The importance of agricultural law should be placed in relation with the fact that the Indonesian government, even after more then 75 year of independence, did not seriously address the plight of peasants and fishermen, living in rural areas throughout Indonesia. Agricultural law as a perspective is developed to bring back the focus of national development to agriculture in its widest sense. The focus of analysis of this approach will be on policies and rules regarding agriculture and how it affects peasants-farmers working in informal-semi formal setting as well those working in the agroindustry and business. Other basic concepts employed relates to ecological-social justice, food sovereignty, security, and safety. Hopefully, this new approach to human development and agriculture may contribute to a better analysis of the plight of agriculture in Indonesia and how to improve this particular sector. Abstrak Hukum pertanian sebagai suatu kajian belum begitu dikenal dalam khasanah ilmu hukum Indonesia. Masyarakat umum, akademisi dan praktisi hukum masih harus berkenalan dengan pendekatan ini. Pentignya hukum pertanian harus ditempatkan dalam konteks kurangnya kepedulian rezim pemerintah Indonesia, bahkan dalam kurun waktu 75 tahun sejak merdeka, pada pembangunan sektor pertanian rakyat. Hukum pertanian merupakan satu upaya untuk mendorong kehidupan pertanian di Indonesia dan mayoritas masyarakat petani (bukan semata-mata perkebunan besar) menjadi bagian dari kehidupan modern yang manusiawi. Fokus kajian hukum pertanian adalah kebijakan dan aturan hukum yang diterbitkan pemerintah dari waktu ke waktu di bidang pertanian dalam arti luas yang bersentuhan dengan kehidupan petani-nelayan, mereka yang bekerja di sektor-sektor informal maupun semi formal sampai dengan agrobisnis dan industri. Sebagai titik tolak, digunakan konsep-konsep dasar keadilan sosial-ekologi, ketahanan-kedaulatan dan keamanan pangan. Salah satu sumbangan yang diharapkan adalah munculnya perspektif pemikiran dan solusi konstruksif yang baru untuk membangun manusia serta agrikultur dalam rangka menangani persoalan kemiskinan dan ketidakadilan sosial di Indonesia.

BAYANGAN AKAN BANGSA DALAM KONTEKS HAK UNTUK MENENTUKAN NASIB SENDIRI: SUATU WACANA Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2958

Two issues shall be discussed: what is meant by people’s right to self determination and how has it been realized, also in the context of indigenous-tribal peoples. Analysis shall be done, by using a juridical doctrinal method. The purpose would go beyond explaining but also induce understanding of people’s right to self determination in the context of nation states. One determining faktor in the construction of a nation state is the emergence of an imagined solidarity between peoples from different races, tribes, or religious beliefs, being the result of suffering under colonialism. Notwithstanding that indigenous or tribal peoples may and in fact experience similar suffering under the state they are considered to be part of, international law, while recognizing their right to self determination, does not fully extend the same scope of rights to them.

Perbandingan Hukum antara Prinsip Habeas Corpus dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Inggris dengan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Ramsen Marpaung; Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 5, No 2 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis asal mula dan penerapan praperadilan dalam kaitannya dengan Habeas Corpus dan menelisik sejauh mana pranata hukum Habeas Corpus dari sistem peradilan pidana Inggris ini diadaptasikan ke dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia berpotensi berkembang menjadi malicious. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis penelitian perbandingan hukum melalui pendekatan perbandingan, pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan konseptual dengan menggunakan data sekunder dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan praperadilan yang ditransplantasikan dari Habeas Corpus tersebut telah menimbulkan banyak masalah, yang akhirnya beberapa masalah berkembang menjadi atau digunakan untuk sesuatu yang malicious, bahkan apabila dibiarkan, maka sesuatu yang malicious tersebut berpotensi memorak-porandakan sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Untuk mencegah hal itu terjadi, maka peran pemerintah diperlukan untuk mereformulasi pengaturan dan praktik praperadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.

A Review of Social Media Restrictions for Children in Indonesia Grace Juanita; Tristam Pascal Moeliono; Lidwina Larasati Himawan; Vionna Angeline Chandra
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v6i2.3861

The growing use of social media platforms by adolescents presents serious challenges such as cyberbullying, data exploitation and adverse psychological effects. Hence, strong regulatory frameworks are essential. This research aims to analyze the legal framework on the limitation of social media for minors in Indonesia and to compare it with the practices in the United States of America and Australia. The research is developed from the standpoint of legislation and comparative law, the normative juridical technique. The main legal tools are Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 (Indonesia), Arkansas Act 689 (United States), the Online Safety Amendment Act 2024 (Australia) and relevant international human rights treaties. Secondary sources are scholarly publications , journal articles , government papers etc . The data were acquired by document review and evaluated using qualitative technique with descriptive analysis. Data veracity was assured by source triangulation and rigorous legal interpretation. “It exposes a huge split in how regulators. The United States ruled that Arkansas Act 689 was unconstitutional because it violated the strong First Amendment right to free expression. Australia has taken a tough prohibitionist stance with large financial penalties for platforms that do not comply. Mental health and safety of children are the top priority Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 of the Indonesian Government has implemented the age categorisation and risk-based access plan that requires parental authorisation and imposes considerable cost on electronic system providers. Like any administrative statute, it has its own challenges, including low levels of digital literacy, uneven technology infrastructure across the archipelago, pushback from global platforms and the absence of an independent supervision body and comprehensive means for victim compensation. The research says more collaboration across sectors, a stronger regulatory framework and higher levels of digital literacy are needed to create a truly safe digital ecosystem for children.

A JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY CONCEPT IN COMPARISON WITH THE MICRO, SMALL, AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (MSMES) CONCEPT Belinda Wijaya; Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21913916

Large businesses in various countries are required to assist and support Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)—known in Indonesia as UMKM—through partnerships. These partnerships can take the form of franchise agreements or other types of agreements. One form of partnership commonly found in business practice is a business opportunity or business package. This paper will examine the form of partnership known as a business opportunity and how the laws in the United States and Indonesia address the development of such collaborations between large-scale businesses and small enterprises (MSMEs or individuals). The research methods employed are normative legal analysis and comparative law. A key finding is that, unlike in the United States, the partnership form giving rise to business opportunity packages—which are not exactly the same as franchise agreements—in Indonesia remains subject to legal practice, meaning it is based solely on contractual freedom. Furthermore, although these business packages resemble partnership agreements between large businesses and SMEs, they differ because they are often formed between investors and individual business activities or even informal ones.

Comparative Study of Judicial Pardon in the Substantive Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law of the Netherlands and Indonesia: Note to the Draft Criminal Procedure Code Tristam Pascal Moeliono; Aris Hardinanto
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i2.26047

The ruling on Rechterlijk Pardon (judicial pardon) or passing sentence of guilt without imposing penal sanction is regulated in Article 54 paragraph (2) of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning Criminal Code. On the other hand, various academic drafts of the Criminal Procedure Law, and draft of the Criminal Procedure Law dated March 21, 2023, did not contain a ruling on the same. Meanwhile, the draft of criminal procedure code dated February 17, 2025, March 3, 2025, March 15, 2025, and March 20, 2025 mentions this legal institution only in passing. The legal lacunae resulting from this disharmony consequently make it impossible the passing such a sentence in practice. Numerous legal academic writings on Judicial Pardon can be found written by Indonesian legal scholars, but none seems to focus on the legal history of this institution using primary legal sources and none of those articles refers to most recent draft criminal procedure code. Moreover, those articles still refer to the old criminal code and criminal procedure code draft. The method used in this research is legal normative, using statutory approach as well as comparative law. The main argument here is that the ruling about judicial pardon should be added into the draft of the criminal procedure code. With the intent to rectify the existing legal lacunae, this article discusses the above shortcomings and addresses the existing disharmony between criminal law and criminal procedural law and how to fill in the legal gaps. The author's main arguments are, taking in consideration the necessity to harmonize substantive and procedural law, first, that the legislature should synchronize-harmonize internally and externally the academic draft of the draft criminal procedure law and with the existing criminal code. Secondly, in the draft criminal procedure code should be added a ruling making the passing of judicial pardon a possibility. Third, to add a ruling obligating judge who pass such sentences to adequately support his/her decisions with arguments. Lastly, to add another ruling elaborating on for what crimes would judicial pardon be allowed and to what extent such sentences would be eligible to be challenged

Co-Authors Aris Hardinanto Belinda Wijaya Grace Juanita Koerniatmanto Soetoprawiro Lidwina Larasati Himawan Ramsen Marpaung Vionna Angeline Chandra

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search