Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Indeks Ketahanan Lingkungan sebagai Bukti Pembuatan Kebijakan: Sebuah Sosialisasi Evidence-based Policy di Desa Lorok, Kecamatan Indralaya Utara, Kabupaten Ogan Ilir Faisal Nomaini; Muhammad Husni Thamrin; Oemar Madri Bafadhal
PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 6 No 4 (2021): PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/pengabdianmu.v6i4.1849

Abstract

Practitioners and academics are faced with problems about why public policy fails to achieve its goals and is met with resistance from the public. This then led to the birth of an evidence-based policy (EBP) concept that is trusted and has been proven to increase policy success. Unfortunately, this concept has not yet reached the village government level. Therefore, this community service aims to socialize this concept and put it into practice by taking a case study on the environmental resilience index as one of the compilations of the village developing index (IDM). We took a case study in Desa Lorok, Kecamatan Indralaya Utara, Kabupaten Ogan Ilir for several reasons, such as governance and their readiness to accept this new concept. This community service is a model for implementing EBP by the needs and characteristics of the community because it is formulated jointly between us as academics and the community. Another result is policy recommendations for increasing environmental resilience by focusing on the criteria composing the index.
What promotes cognitive dissonance among anti-vaccine members in Indonesia? Muhammad Husni Thamrin; Oemar Madri Bafadhal; Anang Dwi Santoso
International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) Vol 12, No 1: March 2023
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijphs.v12i1.22125

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the influence of expectations on vaccines, trust in government, perceived threats, and information overload to cognitive dissonance and its implications for vaccine use, behavioral negotiation, and information avoidance. After we formulated eight hypotheses, all of them was tested using the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. This study involved 173 community members to fill out a questionnaire with 31 questions. The results showed that expectations of vaccines and information overload affected cognitive dissonance. In contrast, the perceived threat due to the COVID-19 pandemic and trust in the government did not affect cognitive dissonance. We also found that cognitive dissonance negatively and significantly affected vaccine use and positively and significantly affected behavior to continue negotiating and avoiding information related to COVID-19 vaccination. This study is among the first to examine members of the anti-vaccine community quantitatively and practically attempts to intervene in the anti-vaccine community so that they are cognitively dissonant are to increase expectations of vaccination and confuse them by presenting the information overload they receive.
Implementation of Diversion for Children Facing the Law at the Palembang Class I Correctional Center Aprizayanti Anggelina; Alfitri Alfitri; Muhammad Husni Thamrin; Andries Lionardo
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v6i4.52678

Abstract

This study examines the application of diversion in the juvenile criminal justice system with a focus on the role of community research (litmas) and the recommendations of Community Supervisors (PK) in Bapas Class I Palembang. This study highlights the practice of diversion in handling children's cases, the position of litmas and PK recommendations in decision-making, as well as institutional barriers that affect its effectiveness. The research uses a socio-legal qualitative approach with a case study design, through interviews with PK, law enforcement officials, and related stakeholders, as well as a review of litmas documents, diversion agreements, case decisions, and regulations. The analysis was carried out thematically by triangulating sources. The results of the study show that the success of diversion is highly dependent on the quality of social assessment in litmas, the ability to facilitate deliberation, and the sustainability of post-agreement supervision. Litmas acts as a tool for mapping children's needs and risks, the basis for guidance recommendations, and a means of accountability. The main obstacles include weak coordination across institutions, differences in interpretation of procedures, limited resources, and non-optimal monitoring mechanisms. This study recommends strengthening the standardization of litmas, increasing the capacity of diversion facilitators, integrating support services, and developing a measurable monitoring system so that diversion is truly oriented towards the recovery of children and victims.