Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KAJIAN IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN KEPALA BPN RI NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PENGELOLAAN PENGKAJIAN DAN PENANGANAN KASUS PERTANAHAN Siti Rahma Novikasari; Bayu Panji Pangestu
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 1, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (781.769 KB)

Abstract

AbstractToday, more and more frictions are found in the rights of tenure that led to land dispute cases, and cases of land conflicts. In handling cases BPN has had formal rules: BPN Regulation No. 3 Year 2011 on the Assessment and Management of Land Management Case. This study highlights the implementation of the Head of BPN Regulation No. 3 Year 2011 on the Assessment and Management of Treatment Case Management Land, and also by BPN DIY Regional Office along with advantages and disadvantages. BPN Regional Office is a means of land disputes settlement in the realm of alternative dispute resolution in case of the complaint, entails the issuance of the settlement in the form of criteria 1, criteria 2, criteria 3, criteria 4 and criteria 5. In the solution of land cases there are obstacles in the internal and external BPN DIY Regional Office along with effort to accelerate the completion of land cases and improving the quality of personnel. IntisariDewasa ini, makin banyak ditemui persinggungan antara hak penguasaan atas tanah yang berujung kasus  pertanahan baik berupa sengketa, konflik maupun perkara pertanahan. Dalam melakukan penanganan kasus, BPN telah memiliki aturan resmi yaitu Peraturan Kepala BPN RI Nomor 3 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Pengkajian dan Penanganan Kasus Pertanahan. Penelitian ini menyoroti implementasi Kepala BPN RI Nomor 3 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Pengkajian dan Penanganan Kasus Pertanahan oleh Kanwil BPN DIY beserta kelebihan dan kekurangannya. Kanwil BPN adalah salah satu sarana penyelesaian kasus pertanahan dalam ranah alternative dispute resolution atas kasus-kasus yang diadukan hingga dikeluarkannya bentuk penyelesaian dalam Kriteria 1, Kriteria 2, Kriteria 3, Kriteria 4 dan Kriteria 5. Dalam melakukan penyelesaian kasus pertanahan terdapat kendala dalam internal maupun Eksternal kanwil BPN DIY beserta upaya percepatan penyelesaian kasus pertanahan dan peningkatan kualitas aparat.
Overtraining Dan Cedera Non-Kontak Pada Atlet Basket Remaja Indonesia Encep Farlan Sutarza; Sucipto Sucipto; Mulyana Mulyana; Dede Rohmat; Zuliza Adha; Bayu Panji Pangestu
Jurnal Sporta Saintika Vol 11 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Sporta Saintika Edisi Maret 2026
Publisher : Departemen Kesehatan Dan Rekreasi Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/sporta.v11i1.555

Abstract

Overtraining and non-contact injuries represent critical issues in the development of adolescent basketball athletes and may compromise long-term performance progression. Overtraining is defined as a maladaptive condition resulting from an imbalance between training load and recovery, whereas non-contact injuries are primarily associated with impaired neuromuscular control and biomechanical risk factors in the absence of external contact. This conceptual article aims to analyze the relationship between overtraining, neuromuscular fatigue, altered movement control, and high-risk biomechanical patterns contributing to non-contact injuries, while outlining practical prevention implications relevant to the Indonesian youth sport context. A narrative review approach was conducted using scientific publications from 2015 to 2025. The findings indicate that high training volume and intensity, early sport specialization, limited program variation, and insufficient load monitoring and recovery strategies contribute substantially to injury risk. The most frequently reported injuries include ankle sprains, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and hamstring strains. Preventive strategies include structured periodization, developmentally appropriate variation in training, load monitoring using session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), and systematic recovery education.