Teuku Nanda Putra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pain score evaluation in patients underwent hand surgery under WALANT compared to those under local or general anesthesia with tourniquet Teuku Nanda Putra; Yanis, Melissa Abigail
Journal of International Surgery and Clinical Medicine Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): (Available online: December 2023)
Publisher : Surgical Residency Program Syiah Kuala University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/jiscm.v3i2.38

Abstract

Background: The Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) has been reported to offer simpler pre-surgical instruction and assessment, faster operating time, better surgical visualization, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications and side effects, lower cost, faster post-operative recovery time, better patient’s satisfaction, and less pain and discomfort. This study aims to review the pain score in hand surgery using the WALANT technique compared to local anesthesia or general anesthesia with a tourniquet. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar in March 2021. Eligible randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies compared injection time intra-operative or post-operative pain using Visual Analog Score (VAS) in WALANT and local anesthesia or general anesthesia with a tourniquet. Results: Five studies (3 RCTs and two cohorts) were included in this article, including 645 hand surgeries (376 carpal tunnel syndrome cases, 181 trigger finger cases, 42 cubital tunnel syndrome cases, 44 de Quervain’s disease cases, and two ganglion cyst cases). Three studies reported a significantly lower VAS in the WALANT group, while the other two reported a lower VAS in the WALANT group, but not statistically significant. Conclusion: WALANT is still a technique worth considering in hand surgery because of its superiority in minimizing intra-operative and post-operative pain.
Pain score evaluation in patient underwent hand surgery under walant compared to those under local or general anesthesia with tourniquet Teuku Nanda Putra; Yanis, Melissa Abigail
Journal of International Surgery and Clinical Medicine Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): (Available online: 1 June 2024)
Publisher : Surgical Residency Program Syiah Kuala University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/jiscm.v4i1.53

Abstract

Background: The Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) has been reported to offer simpler pre-surgical instruction and assessment, faster operating time, better surgical visualization, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications, and side effects, lower cost, faster postoperative recovery time, better patient's satisfaction, and less pain and discomfort. This study aims to review the pain score in hand surgery using the WALANT technique compared to local anesthesia or general anesthesia with a tourniquet. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar in March 2021. Eligible randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing injection time, intra-operative, or postoperative pain using Visual Analog Score (VAS) in WALANT and local anesthesia or general anesthesia with tourniquet were included. Results: Five studies (3 RCTs and 2 cohorts) were included in this article, including 645 hand surgeries (376 carpal tunnel syndrome cases, 181 trigger finger cases, 42 cubital tunnel syndrome cases, 44 de Quervain's disease cases, and 2 ganglion cyst cases). Three studies reported a significantly lower VAS in the WALANT group, while the other two studies reported a lower VAS in the WALANT group, but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: WALANT is still a technique worth considering in hand surgery because of its superiority in minimizing intra-operative and postoperative pain.
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OCCLUSAL WAFER IN SEVERE MANDIBULAR FRACTURE CASES WITH POST-ORIF MALOCCLUSION: A CASE SERIES Chintia Amelia Pratiwi; Mirnasari Amirsyah; Teuku Nanda Putra
Jurnal Rekonstruksi dan Estetik Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Rekonstruksi dan Estetik, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jre.v9i2.54889

Abstract

Highlights: This study shows that occlusal wafers can effectively correct malocclusion in patients with segmental mandibular fractures after ORIF plating. Occlusal wafers help reshape the dental arch within 2 to 4 weeks, reduce surgery time, and simplify follow-up care, making them a valuable option for surgeons. Abstract: Introduction: Improper treatment of severe mandibular fractures can lead to malocclusion, which poses a significant challenge for reconstructive surgeons. The occlusal wafer provides an effective solution for managing malocclusion following ORIF plating of maxillofacial fractures during the one-month postoperative evaluation period. Made from acrylic resin, the occlusal wafer serves as an intermediate guide in orthognathic surgery. It helps reposition the maxilla, adjust the mandible, and modify the jawbones to achieve ideal occlusion. The device can reshape the dental arch to any pre-planned position within 2 to 4 weeks. Case Illustration: We present two cases of patients with segmental fractures.Case 1: A 26-year-old male also had segmental fractures of the left angle and right body of the mandible. He achieved occlusion after ORIF plating; however, malocclusion developed during the three-week follow-up. Case 2: A 28-year-old female presented with segmental fractures of the left angle and right body of the mandible. She initially achieved occlusion after ORIF plating, but malocclusion was noted during the one-month follow-up.  Discussion: Both of these patients had segmental fractures and experienced malocclusion following ORIF plating, but occlusion was achieved after occlusal wafer installation. Conclusion: The use of an occlusal wafer facilitates optimal occlusion, streamlines the surgical procedure by reducing operating time, and enhances the ease of postoperative monitoring. This approach proves particularly valuable in cases where ORIF plating has been performed yet ideal occlusal alignment remains unachieved.