Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Differences of Batubara and Tanjung Pura Malay Language from Phonological Aspects Doni Efrizah
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute February
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i1.4203

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the differences between Batu Bara Malay and Tanjung Pura Malay in terms of phonological aspects. There are many differences in the vocabulary used in the two Malay languages, both in pronunciation and writing. For this reason, it is necessary to describe the differences in the vocabulary of Batubara Malay and Tanjung Pura Malay. These words have the same meaning but are pronounced differently. This study uses an approach that focuses on the designation of the same meaning but different pronunciation. This study uses data in the form of basic Malay vocabularies based on sources from Batu Bara Malay and Tanjung Pura Malay communities which are translated into Indonesian. The instrument used in data collection in this study was a recording device used to interview several natives of Batu Bara and Tanjung Pura area who have a distinctive Malay accent. The method used in this research is listening and recording method and the research also use the technique of listen and write. This study uses a method that is presented informally. The results of this study are the differences between Batu Bara Malay and Tanjung Pura Malay phonologically.
Lecturers’ Feedback on Students’ Reading at Politeknik LP3I Medan Ramadani Ramadani; Andrysyah Andrysyah; Siska Hasibuan; Asri Sanusi; Doni Efrizah
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6638

Abstract

This study dealt lecturers’ feedback on students’ reading at Politeknik LP3I Medan. This study aimed to find out lecturers’ feedback on students’ reading at Politeknik LP3I Medan. This study used the theory from Ellis (2009). Methodology of this study used qualitative research by Miles, Huberman and Saldana (2014), it was interactive method. The collecting data of this study was observation and recording students and lecturers’ utterances on learning process in reading class. The recording was transcribed to find out the data related to the study. The result of this study, there were direct feedback and indirect feedback. There were four process of feedback that implemented in learning process on reading class, they are explicit correction, metalinguistic comment, recast and repetition. Process of feedback was not related to the theory from Ellis (2009). There were six processes of feedback by Ellis (2009). They were explicit correction, metalinguistic comment, recast, repetition, elicitation and clarification request. In this study, researcher did not find two processes of feedback, they were elicitation and clarification request.