Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Mediation Effectiveness in Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement: Phenomenology in Bukittinggi Religious Court Riska Fauziah Hayati; Busyro Busyro; Bustamar Bustamar
Alhurriyah Vol 6, No 1 (2021): January - June 2021
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v6i1.4097

The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant. Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 belum efektif. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.

Dispute Resolution on Muḍārabah Musytarakah Contract on Sharia Insurance in Indonesia: Between Regulation and Practice Riska Fauziah Hayati; Abdul Mujib
El-Mashlahah Vol 12, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/elma.v12i1.3795

This paper discussed on how to resolve disputes over the muḍārabah musytarakah contract in sharia insurance by looking at the applicable sharia insurance dispute settlement regulations and sharia insurance policies. This research was normative legal research using the documentation method. The results showed that in various regulations and policies regarding sharia insurance, there are various alternatives (choice of forum) in dispute resolution, including in the muḍārabah musytarakah contract. In general, sharia economic dispute resolution can be done in two ways, namely litigation and non-litigation. Litigation dispute resolution was guided by the mandate of Law Number 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts. Several alternative non-litigation dispute resolutions are mentioned in various regulations, including: by deliberation and consensus; through mediation institutions that are independent and impartial; through an association by the business activities of a sharia insurance company; or the Shari'ah Arbitration Board. Then, in the sharia insurance general policy, there are also various alternative dispute resolutions, including amicably reaching a mutual agreement. But if it is not successful, then the dispute resolution will be carried out through the Indonesian Insurance Mediation Board (BMAI); through the Sharia Arbitration Board; Religious Courts/District Courts in the policy area are issued, or the participant chooses one of the dispute resolution options and is obliged to notify the company.

Tahkim dalam Standar Syariah dan Urgensinya terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia Arifki Budia Warman; Riska Fauziah Hayati
Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 22 No. 01 (2022): Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kerinci, Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/islamika.v22i01.1246

The practice of sharia economics is growing and diverse, which has resulted in the emergence of various sharia economic disputes. This requires the development of alternative dispute resolutions, as has been done by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) by presenting Sharia Standards that specifically discuss tahkim. This paper aims to explain the provisions of tahkim in the Sharia Standards of AAOIFI and the urgency of resolving sharia economic disputes. Using the content analysis method by collecting various relevant references, this study found that various provisions must be met when carrying out a tahkim contract in the settlement of sharia economic disputes, including those relating to the pillars and requirements of tahkim, the object that is the authority of the tahkim contract, provisions for the appointment of judges, and the power of judges' decisions. The application of the tahkim contract in the settlement of sharia economic law disputes has several advantages, namely that it is fast, cheap, efficient, energy and thought-efficient, fair, and fulfills the benefits of the disputing parties, so the development and application of tahkim as an alternative economic dispute resolution is very important.

TRANSMISI HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH DI RUANG DIGITAL (KAJIAN TERHADAP AKUN INSTAGRAM @MUAMALAH_DAILY) Riska Fauziah Hayati
JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Vol 20, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar

Nowadays, users of mobile devices are experiencing in increase. Likewise in accessing various social media, one of which is Instagram. Instagram provides various features to disseminate information that supports the fulfillment of people’s information needs. Like the instagram account @muamalah_daily as a medium for transmission muamalah. This paper intends to explore what kind of Islamic economic law discourse is represented by the Instagram account @muamalah_daily, as well as how the discourse is constructed. To answer these questions, the approach used in this study was content analysis. This paper found that Islamic economic law represented in the @muamalah_daily account is dominated by contextual contemporary muamalah fiqh while still paying attention to the basic concepts of classical fiqh. The discourse is constructed in light language that easily understood by the public, and is packaged in an attractive appearance. The @muamalah_daily account is also flexible and systematic in responding to contemporary practices. Along with the times, the practice of sharia economic law is increasingly diverse; many people are still taboo about the law. In this condition, society needs legal knowledge about contemporary economic practices that are still new. Thus, the @muamalah_daily account indirectly influences the Islamic economic law discourse that develops in society.

Mediation Effectiveness in Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement: Phenomenology in Bukittinggi Religious Court Riska Fauziah Hayati; Busyro Busyro; Bustamar Bustamar
Alhurriyah Vol 6, No 1 (2021): January - June 2021
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant. Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 belum efektif. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search