Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Alat Bukti Digital dalam Pembuktian Kasus Phantom Hacker Scam Tegar San Putra; Sigit Sapto Nugroho; Meirza Aulia Chairani
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 7 (2026): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3276

Abstract

This study examines the validity of digital evidence in proving cases of phantom hacker scams, a form of cybercrime committed by manipulating digital identities and false electronic footprints to deceive victims. The object of this study is digital evidence used in law enforcement against information technology-based fraud. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal regulations related to digital evidence and assess its evidentiary strength in uncovering and proving cases of phantom hacker fraud. The research method used is normative legal research with a regulatory and contextual approach, through an examination of provisions of criminal law, criminal procedure law and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law. The results show that digital evidence has legal validity as long as it is obtained and managed in accordance with the principles of legality, integrity, and authentication as stipulated in the legislation. However, proving cases of phantom hacker scams faces technical and legal challenges, particularly regarding the validity of digital forensics and the linkage of evidence to the perpetrator. Therefore, strengthening law enforcement capacity and digital evidence standards are important factors in ensuring the effectiveness of cybercrime law enforcement.
Legal Construction of Judge Rule Number: 798 / Pid.B / 2022 / Pn.Jkt.Sel Justice Collaborator against Police Status Position Bharada Eliezer Meirza Aulia Chairani; Trinah Asi Islami; Gustavo Marcos; Sarjiyati Sarjiyati; Angga Pramodya Pradhana
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the position of Bharada Eliezer against Decision Variety; 798/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel related to Justice Collabolator police status position and the Police Code of Ethics Decision related to Bharada Eliezer's Police Status. Methodology: This research makes use of a normative juridical research method, a conceptual technique, and a statutory technique. Results: Basically a person who commits a criminal offence of taking the life of another person is a violation of human rights and deprivation of the right to life especially when the person who commits the murder is a law enforcer and remains a member of the police, but in this case with the consideration of the judge and the consideration of the official in charge of the KKEP hearing because the perpetrator is submitted as a justice collaborator feared by irresponsible parties abused. Applications of this study: Provide input to all members of the National Police so as not to commit acts that violate the laws and regulations and the code of ethics of the police profession and tarnish the good name of the police organization or agency. Novelty/Originality of this study: There is a need to update the requirements and guidelines for justice collaborators because some criminal offenses that harm the state and extraordinary crimes really need justice collaborators to shed light on a criminal offense that was initially blurred in the facts.