Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Tetap atas Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Pemisahan Perseroan (Spin Off) ditinjau dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Kevin Darmawan; Holyness N. Singadimedja; Rafan Darodjat
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei: Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i2.608

Abstract

Labor law in Indonesia prioritizes the protection of workers as a primary focus in industrial relations. This protection becomes highly relevant in the context of termination of employment (PHK), particularly in cases where PHK is carried out on the grounds of corporate spin offs. This study aims to analyze the company’s responsibility in fulfilling workers' rights and the legal measures that can be taken to ensure workers' welfare in accordance with Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021. The research method employs a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical review of primary documents, such as labor-related legislation, and secondary documents related to the PHK process. The analysis reveals that PHK conducted by a company on the basis of a spin off lacks a strong legal foundation if it contradicts the principles of legal certainty and worker protection as stipulated in applicable regulations. In the event that PHK is still carried out, the company is obligated to provide full compensation to workers, including severance pay, service appreciation pay, and rights replacement as outlined in PP 35/2021. Furthermore, workers are advised to pursue their rights through non-litigation, litigation at the Industrial Relations Court, or administrative measures in a step-by-step manner. The implication of these findings underscores the importance of enforcing labor laws to protect workers' rights during corporate restructuring.
Perlindungan dan Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak Dalam Fleksibilitas Ekonomi Gig di Indonesia Tampubolon, Boy Joshua P.; Holyness N. Singadimedja; Rubiati, Betty
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v8i2.23793

Abstract

The rapid growth of the digital economy has given birth to a flexible working model known as the gig economy. In Indonesia, this system offers ease in work dynamics, but also creates vulnerabilities for its workers. This study uses a normative juridical approach with literature and field study methods. The purpose is to examine the legal relationship between the parties in gig work practices based on labor regulations and the Civil Code, as well as evaluate forms of legal protection for gig workers in partnership relationships to support their welfare. The lack of an element of command in the employment relationship between platforms and gig workers leads to limited access to the protection of labor rights, such as social security and wages. Therefore, a comprehensive and adaptive regulatory framework is needed to ensure protection for gig workers without hindering the operational flexibility of digital platforms.
Penyuluhan Hukum Mengenai Larangan Pencantuman Klausula Baku Bagi Pelaku Usaha dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pelindungan Konsumen Agus Suwandono; Deviana Yuanitasari; Nun Harrieti; Etty Mulyati; Holyness N. Singadimedja; Rafan Darodjat
PaKMas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Mei 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Penelitian Pengabdian Algero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54259/pakmas.v4i1.2869

Abstract

Standard clauses in consumer protection are terms or conditions unilaterally determined by business actors. Standard clauses are regulated in Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. Understanding standard clauses is essential for consumers and business actors, so legal counseling is needed to increase awareness and understanding for consumers and business actors. The Consumer Protection Act does not prohibit the inclusion of standard clauses in agreement documents between consumers and business actors. The Consumer Protection Act only prohibits the inclusion of standard clauses contrary to Article 18, paragraphs (1) (2) of the Consumer Protection Act. Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Act determines that the standard clause that contradicts Article 18 paragraph (1), (2) of the Consumer Protection Act is declared null and void. In addition, the legal consequences for business actors for the inclusion of standard clauses that are contrary to Article 18 paragraph (1), (2) of the Consumer Protection Act based on Article 62 paragraph (1) of the Consumer Protection Act are threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of five years or a maximum fine of two billion. In including standard clauses in documents or agreements with consumers, business actors must pay attention to the provisions of Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. This legal counseling activity increases the awareness and understanding of consumers and business actors regarding standard clauses based on consumer protection laws, which can ultimately realize consumer protection.