Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum International Conference on Social Science
M. Eka Putra
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Bentuk Penyuapan (Studi Putusan No 12/Pid.Sus Tpk/2018/Pn Medan) Saur Sihaloho; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi; M. Eka Putra
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Februari - Mei
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i1.88

Abstract

Corruption can take place anywhere, in state institutions, in private institutions, and also in daily life. Combating corruption requires treatment and prevention in an integrated manner with the proper functioning of the legal system of the law and legal institutions in the criminal justice system. Types of research conducted in this research is normative juridical and the nature of this research is descriptive analysis. The data collection techniques used in this research is through library research. Based on the results of this research criminal liability against corruption is the liability of the offenses committed by the offender. Criminal act committed must meet the elements that have been determined by constitution. Someone will be held accountable for these actions when there is an element in the action against the law and there is no excuse and fault elements must be met in terms of combating corruption. This is due to the principle of liability in criminal law that is not tobe punishment if no fault. Criminal acts and the responsibility of the perpetrators of criminal acts for corruption in the form of bribery based on Decision No. 12 / Pid.Sus.TPK / 2018 / PN Medan where to defendant has been proven legally and convincingly, the defendant is able to be responsible and there is no excuse any fault that may negate or justification which can eliminate the unlawful nature of the act, the criminal liability for acts of corruption in the form of sentencing of offenders as set forth in Medan District Court's decision
Analisis Ratio Decidendi Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Rumusan Pasalnya Tidak Ada Ancaman Pidana Mati (Studi Putusan No. 241/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Tjb) Antonius Bangun Silitonga; Alvi Syahrin; Mahmud Mulyadi; M. Eka Putra
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.155

Abstract

In the preamble to letter c of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, it is stated that narcotics on the one hand are drugs or substances that are useful in the field of medicine or health services and development of science and on the other hand can also cause dependency which is very detrimental if misused or used without control. And close and careful supervision. In Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics, there are several articles that use the death penalty, including: Article 113 paragraph (2), Article 114 paragraph (2), Article 116 paragraph (2), Article 118 paragraph (2), Article 119 paragraph (2), Article 121 paragraph (2), Article 133 paragraph (2) of Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics, states that perpetrators of criminal acts can be sentenced to death or imprisonment. This research includes normative legal research. Data analysis data processing basically depends on the type of data, for normative legal research that only recognizes secondary data, which consists of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The secondary data includes research on positive legal inventories, legal principles, clinical legal research, systematics of statutory regulations, court decisions, legal history and comparative law. The defendant charged with the Primair indictment is Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009, while the Subsidiary indictment is Article 112 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, however the Judge’s Verdict is a subsidies charge with the death penalty, whereas the Article in the Subsidair Indictment has a maximum sentence of 20 (twenty) years in prison. The Panel of Judges can be deemed incompetent in carrying out their duties, because they ignore the value of legal certainty in their decisions, so that what arises is injustice for both the perpetrator and the community, besides that in accordance with the provisions of Article 197 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the decision is declared null and void because it is not in accordance with the content of Article 197 paragraph (1) letter c of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia number: 321 K / Pid / 1983 dated 26 May 1984 and the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 694 K / Pid / 1984 dated 15 May 1994 resulted in the decision null and void.
Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice in Indonesia it is Associated with the Renewal Criminal Law Fajar Rudi Manurung; Topo Santoso; M. Eka Putra; Marlina Marlina
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Science (ICSS) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social Science (ICSS)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/icss.v3i2.225

Abstract

Criminal acts arise from various aspects of human activity, including the political, social and economic spheres. The success of law enforcement is traditionally measured by the ability to bring criminals to justice and impose appropriate penalties. However, in certain minor cases, such as theft, embezzlement, and fraud with minimal losses, the public questions the need for prosecution, as they believe that prosecution does not match the seriousness of the offense.  The purpose of this study is to analyze the implications and effectiveness of prosecution discontinuation based on restorative justice in the Indonesian legal framework. Using a qualitative research approach, this study examines the regulatory structure and practical application of restorative justice in Indonesia. Data was collected through document analysis and interviews with legal practitioners to explore alignment of regulations with legal principles and community expectations. The research findings show that, although restorative justice offers a viable avenue to achieve peace between offenders and victims, its implementation in Indonesia is still limited, as it is not yet embedded in the broader criminal law system. Currently, peace agreements between the parties are only considered as a mitigating factor in the sentencing process. This research suggests that stronger legal legitimacy for restorative justice, such as the inclusion of restorative justice into the Draft Criminal Procedure Code is essential to adapt to the evolving legal culture and public expectations. The implications of this research highlight the need for comprehensive criminal law reform to ensure justice that aligns with societal values and contemporary legal standards.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU HACKING YANG DENGAN SENGAJA DAN TANPA HAK ATAU MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA CYBER CRIME (DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEDUA ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK) Ray Arnata Sembiring; M. Eka Putra; Joiverdia Arifiyanto
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): May 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i2.2932

Abstract

Abstract: The crime of hacking is a crime committed by entering another person's electronic system that is private, in any way so that it is a prohibited act. Hacking is categorized as one of the crimes in cyberspace because hackers are people who master programming who can hack or hack security systems on computers or networks for certain purposes. The problems in this study are how to regulate hacking in Indonesia, what are the obstacles and efforts in overcoming hacking that is intentional and without rights or against the law in Indonesia, how is the criminal responsibility of hacking perpetrators based on the decision of the Pelaihari District Court Number 9 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN.Pli and the decision of the Cikarang District Court Number 515 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN.Ckr. The research method used is the normative legal research method by analyzing court decisions. The types of research data are primary data and secondary data and are arranged systematically and analyzed qualitatively and draw conclusions deductively. Based on the research results, it can be seen that the legal regulation of hacking acts in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The obstacle in overcoming hacking that is intentional and without rights or against the law in cyber crime is in the aspect of digital evidence that is easily removed if not handled in a timely manner. Keywords: Criminal Liability, Hacking, Cyber Crime. Abstrak: Tindak pidana peretasan (hacker)  merupakan tindak pidana yang dilakukan dengan cara masuk ke dalam sistem elektronik milik orang lain yang bersifat pribadi, dengan cara apapun sehingga merupakan tindakan terlarang. Hacking dikategorikan sebagai salah satu kejahatan di dunia maya karena hacker merupakan orang yang menguasai pemrograman yang dapat melakukan hacking atau peretasan sistem keamanan pada komputer atau jaringan dengan tujuan tertentu. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan perbuatan hacking di Indonesia, bagaimana hambatan dan upaya dalam penanggulangan hacking yang dengan sengaja dan tanpa hak atau melawan hukum di Indonesia, bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku hacking berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pelaihari Nomor 9/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pli dan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cikarang Nomor 515/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Ckr. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menganalisis putusan Pengadilan. Jenis data penelitian ini adalah data primer dan data sekunder dan disusun secara sistematis dan dianalisis secara kualitatif serta menarik kesimpulan secara deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa pengaturan hukum perbuatan hacking di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Hambatan dalam penanggulangan terhadap hacking yang dengan sengaja  dan tanpa hak atau melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana cyber crime adalah pada aspek barang bukti digital mudah dihilangkan jika tidak ditangani dengan tepat waktu.   Kata kunci: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Hacking, Cyber Crime.
Co-Authors Alvi Syahrin Antonius Bangun Silitonga Fajar Rudi Manurung Joiverdia Arifiyanto Madiasa Ablisar Mahmud Mulyadi Marlina, Marlina Ray Arnata Sembiring Saur Sihaloho Topo Santoso