Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA SEBAGAI HAL YANG MERINGANKAN HUKUMAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Budi Prakarsa Ketaren; Alvi Syahrin; M. Hamdan; Madiasa Ablisar
Jurnal Abdi Ilmu Vol 14 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Abdi Ilmu
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PEMBANGUNAN PANCA BUDI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The corruption is an axtradionary crime that damage and endagers the financial and economic of a state. If this nation did not aware the corruption as the root of problem, it is difficult for Indonesia to manage its self even for rise from the buried. The returning the loss of nation did not terminate the law prosecess on the corruption crime. But the returning of the loss of the state and followed by the elimination of the law process on corruption crime can be accepted as ultimate in corruption eradication. The problem in this thesis are : How the returning process of the state financial asset through the corruption crime justice as mentioned in the Act ? Did the returning the state financial will influence the punisment for criminal in the corruption crime justice ? What a returning of state financial in corruption crime justice in relationo to the objective of the punishment ? The asset recovery did not determined explicitly in Act No. 17/2003 concering to the State Financial and Act No. 20/2001 concering to theCorruption Crime Eradication even did not in Act No. 15/2002 that revised by Act No. 25/2003 concerning ti the money Laundry. The asset recovery is new nomenclatire and independent, separated from the term “State Financial”.this term indicate ecplicitly that asset of corruption is a property as the state asset. If the asset recovery had implemented in corruption crime justice, the judge is wise to provide the lower punishmen because the asset had be recovered.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGGUNAAN TEKNOLOGI DALAM PROSES PENYELIDIKAN DAN PENYIDIKAN UNTUK MENGUNGKAP KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA Martuasah Tobing; Alvi Syahrin; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi
Law Jurnal Vol 1, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v1i2.1129

Abstract

ABSTRAKPengungkapan kejahatan adalah salah satu tugas pokok Polri dalam rangka penegakan hukum. Pada dasarnya penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana adalah untuk mengumpulkan alat bukti guna membuat terang peristiwa yang terjadi dan menemukan pelakunya. Konsep kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis pengaturan proses pengambilan data elektronik yang digunakan sebagai alat bukti dan prosedur penggunaan teknologi dalam proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan kasus pembunuhan berencana. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bentuk penyajianya bersifat deskriptif analisis. Akhir kesimpulan di hasilkan bagaimana bukti-bukti elektronik sebagai kajian bukti yang sah dalam mengarahkan pertanggung jawaban pelaku atas tindak kejahatan yang dilakukan dalam menjerat pelaku telah sesuai dengan prosedur kewenangan, sebagaimanana Cek/Olah TKP; Permintaan Salinan CCTV; Permintaan Otopsi dan Uji Balistik; Permintaan Cloning Handphone ke Labfor Mabes Polri; dan Permintaan CDR ke Telkomsel sebagaimana aturan dasar dalam pemenuhan minimal 2 (dua) alat bukti yang sah sesuai dengan Pasal 184 KUHAP dan ditambah dengan perluasan alat bukti yang sah berdasarkan Pasal 5 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU ITE.Kata Kunci: Penyelidikan dan penyidikan; teknologi informasi; pembunuhan berencana.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pada Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Atas Dampak Kerusakan Jalan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Rembang Nomor 129/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Rbg) B.A.S. Faomasi Jaya Laia; Madiasa Ablisar; Alvi Syahrin; M. Ekaputra
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.156

Abstract

The problem of traffic accidents that cause death due to road damage is a problem that is always prominent from time to time. Of course, it needs to be studied in the aspect of criminal liability to resolve if there is a legal event in question occurs. The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The results showed that awave of traffic accidents that occurred due to road damage here found there were 2 (two) pihak which will basically receive the consequences ofroad users(community)  both victims and perpetrators,for  road organizers (whodeal withroad repairs / road repairs, namely the Public Works Office in each region),  Criminalliability for the occurrence of traffic accidents that result in death caused by road damage,can be charged to different parties because of their nature is kasuistis. Rembang District Court Decision No. 129 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN Rbg  basically the judge's decision can be said to be appropriate to say the defendant has been negligent because he was not careful and vigilant when driving on damaged roads / potholes
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pemerasan Dan Atau Pengancaman Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dan Kuh Pidana (Studi: Putusan Nomor 7/Pid.Sus/2017/Pn.Snb) Libert Hamonangan Habeahan; Alvi Syahrin; M Hamdan; M Eka Putra
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Februari - Mei
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i1.82

Abstract

The number of cases of extortion and / or threats using information technology means that the author is interested in conducting research with the title "Criminal Liability Against Extortion and Or Threats Perpetrators According to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Information. Electronic Transactions and the Criminal Code ”(Study: Decision Number 7 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / Pn.Snb) The formulation of the problem in this research is (1) How is the criminal act of extortion and / or threats according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and the Criminal Code, (2) How is criminal responsibility for extortion and / or threats through electronic media according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information And Electronic Transactions and the Criminal Code. (3) What are the judges' legal considerations in Decision Number 7 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Snb? This research is normative and descriptive analysis. The legal theory used in this research is the Criminal Liability Theory. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique is library research (library research). Data analysis is qualitative. The formulation of the provisions of Article 27 paragraph (4) which combines the criminal act of extortion and / or threats in one provision, whereas in the Criminal Code the criminal act of extortion is regulated in Article 368 while threatening is regulated in Article 369 of the Criminal Code. Extortion is a common crime. Extortion is how to do it by using violence or threats of violence. Threatening is an absolute complaint. Criminal responsibility for extortion and / or threats through electronic media according to the ITE Law and the Criminal Code because someone has committed a criminal act. Criminal liability is essentially a mechanism established by the Criminal Code to react to violations of certain acts. Judges' legal considerations in the Court Decision 7 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Snb, that based on the facts at the trial, and the testimony of witnesses, the defendant has been legally and convincingly proven to have committed the crime of extortion and threats of violating Article 27 paragraph 4 UU ITE UU ITE Jo Article 45 paragraph (4) In the trial, the Panel of Judges did not find anything that could eliminate criminal responsibility, either as a justification and / or excuse, so the Defendant had to be accountable for his actions. The defendant is able to be responsible, so he must be found guilty and sentenced to punishment.
Analisis Unsur Permulaan Pelaksanaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Makar Febby Farizky Siregar; Alvi Syahrin; M Ekaputra
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Juni - September
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i2.133

Abstract

As a condition for the crime of treason, the initial element of implementation is something that greatly influences whether or not a person can be charged with the crime of treason. A person can be said to have committed a crime of treason; it must first be proven regarding the intention of the perpetrator stated at the beginning of the implementation which is one of the elements of an attempt to commit a crime One example is the case of treason in Decision Number 1303/Pid.B/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst..Based on the background description, the problems studied are: How is the regulation of the crime of treason in Indonesia, how is the relationship between the beginning of the implementation and the crime of treason, how is the legal analysis of the crime of treason in Decision Number: 1303/PID.B/2019/PN. JKT.PST.The research method used in this research is normative legal research, which is supported by secondary data sources, and qualitative analysis is carried out.The result of the research is that the regulation of the crime of treason in Indonesia is regulated in several articles, including Article 104, Article 106 of the Criminal Code and Article 107 of the Criminal Code. The link between the initial element of implementation and the element of the criminal act of treason in essence has an interrelated relationship, as can be seen in Article 87 of the Criminal Code, so that the crime of treason can be said to have occurred, if the initial element in the form of the perpetrator's intention has been proven as the initial act in committing the crime. treason. Legal analysis is related to the decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 1303/Pid.B/2019/PN Jkt.Pst, the perpetrator's actions should not be subject to Article 106 of the Criminal Code Jo. Article 55 of the Criminal Code, but should be subject to Article 106 Jo. Article 87 of the Criminal Code concerning the act of treason is coupled with the attempted treason itself, so that it can be said that the fundamental error lies in the prosecutor's error in prosecuting the actions of the defendants, so the legal analysis states that the prosecutor's demands in this case are what make the application of the law imposed incompatible with panel of judges.
Analisis Ratio Decidendi Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Rumusan Pasalnya Tidak Ada Ancaman Pidana Mati (Studi Putusan No. 241/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Tjb) Antonius Bangun Silitonga; Alvi Syahrin; Mahmud Mulyadi; M. Eka Putra
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.155

Abstract

In the preamble to letter c of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, it is stated that narcotics on the one hand are drugs or substances that are useful in the field of medicine or health services and development of science and on the other hand can also cause dependency which is very detrimental if misused or used without control. And close and careful supervision. In Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics, there are several articles that use the death penalty, including: Article 113 paragraph (2), Article 114 paragraph (2), Article 116 paragraph (2), Article 118 paragraph (2), Article 119 paragraph (2), Article 121 paragraph (2), Article 133 paragraph (2) of Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics, states that perpetrators of criminal acts can be sentenced to death or imprisonment. This research includes normative legal research. Data analysis data processing basically depends on the type of data, for normative legal research that only recognizes secondary data, which consists of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The secondary data includes research on positive legal inventories, legal principles, clinical legal research, systematics of statutory regulations, court decisions, legal history and comparative law. The defendant charged with the Primair indictment is Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009, while the Subsidiary indictment is Article 112 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, however the Judge’s Verdict is a subsidies charge with the death penalty, whereas the Article in the Subsidair Indictment has a maximum sentence of 20 (twenty) years in prison. The Panel of Judges can be deemed incompetent in carrying out their duties, because they ignore the value of legal certainty in their decisions, so that what arises is injustice for both the perpetrator and the community, besides that in accordance with the provisions of Article 197 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the decision is declared null and void because it is not in accordance with the content of Article 197 paragraph (1) letter c of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia number: 321 K / Pid / 1983 dated 26 May 1984 and the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 694 K / Pid / 1984 dated 15 May 1994 resulted in the decision null and void.
Penerapan Pasal 112 Ayat (1) dan Pasal 127 Ayat (1) Huruf A Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Dina Eriza Valentine Purba; Alvi Syahrin; Edi Yunara; M Eka Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v9i1.6495

Abstract

This study aims to find out the essence of the importance of recording marriages in Muslim communities in Kampung Nangka Village, North Binjai. As mandated by Article 1 of Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage that marriage is an inner and outer bond of a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy and eternal family based on God Almighty. One of the most important things to do is register the marriage. The fact is that in the community, especially in remote areas, marriage registration in official state documents is rarely done. This research is a normative legal research with analytical descriptive nature by using a literature approach and a field approach. Analysis of the data obtained in this study was carried out qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the problem of the lack of marriage registration is caused by several factors, such as the lack of knowledge of some people to the laws and regulations regarding marriage, both from the Islamic legal aspect and the positive legal aspect, the existence of some people who still carry out unregistered marriages for various reasons. This can prevent problems that can harm one party if the marriage is not recorded. Many people do not understand the importance of registering marriages that have been carried out and the consequences because marriages are not registered
Ketentuan Pidana Terkait Pelanggaran Karantina Kesehatan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan Restu Y.S Zendrato; Alvi Syahrin; M Ekaputra; Mahmud Mulyadi
SOSEK : Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi Vol 2, No 3 (2021): November (2021)- Febuari (2022)
Publisher : SOSEK : Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/sosek.v2i3.231

Abstract

Wabah penyakit menular Covid-19 yang menyebabkan terjadinya kedaruratan kesehatan membuat masyarakat takut akan kelangsungan hidup mereka, guna pencegahan itu terjadi maka pemerintah mengeluarkan undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2018 tentang kekarantinaan kesehatan, namun akibat aturan baru tersebut dan muculnya pandemi covid-19 membuat masyarakat melakukan pelanggaran karanitna kesehatan.Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas muncul permasalahan yakni bagaimana alasan pembenar terkait pelanggaran kekarantinaan kesehatan, bagaimana alasan pemaaf terkait pelanggaran kekarantinaan kesehatan, dan bagaimana penjatuhan pidana terkait npelanggaran kekarantinaan kesehatan. Adapun metode penelitiannya menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data primer dan sekunder.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Penjatuhan pidana terhadap pelanggaran kekarantinaan kesehatan masih perlu diperbaiki dalam penjatuhan sanksi dan ketegasan pemerintah dalam meminimalisir penyebaran Covid-19. Akibat banyaknya pelanggaran karantina kesehatan khusunya yang dialami saat ini dengan wabah penyakit menukar Covid-19. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari putusan NOMOR 173/PID.SUS/2021/PT.DKI yang dimana unsur-unsur penghapusan pidana harus diperhatikan agar tidak merugikan berbagai kalangan
Pengembangan Protokol Perlindungan Hukum bagi Korban KDRT untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Hidup dan Kesehatan Reproduksi Perempuan Selama Pandemi Covid-19 di Medan (Kawasan Polsek Medan Baru) alvi syahrin; dahlia kusuma dewi; amelia alsa; Fatmawati Fatmawati; andrio Bukit
ABDIMASKU : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat UTND Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Januari 2022 - Juni 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.247 KB) | DOI: 10.36490/abdimasku.v1i1.234

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) biasanya merupakan korban atau istri perempuan yang efeknya meliputi rasa sakit fisik, stres mental, penurunan kepercayaan diri dan harga diri, mengalami perasaan tidak berdaya, stres pasca-trauma, depresi, dan bahkan keinginan untuk bunuh diri. Apalagi di masa pandemi Covid-19 kali ini, banyak terjadi KDRT di Medan. Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang mengakibatkan masalah kesehatan reproduksi dan akhirnya mengakibatkan gangguan sosiologis. Masalahnya adalah protokol hukum untuk penerapan perlindungan hukum bagi korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dan dampak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga terhadap kesehatan wanita. Indonesia memiliki instrumen undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (UUPKDRT). Penyuluhan ini dimaksudkan untuk memberikan edukasi hukum kepada Perempuan khususnya Ibu Rumah Tangga, yang dilakukan di Polsek Medan Baru dengan jumlah peserta 25 kuesioner. Hasil dari penyuluhan ini adalah Perempuan khususnya Ibu Rumah Tangga dapat memperoleh pengetahuan terkait dengan penyelesaian kasus KDRT dalam mewujudkan hak-hak perempuan memperoleh kesehatan reproduksi yang sehat agar tidak mengalami gangguan menstruasi, mengalami menopause dini, mengalami penurunan libido, ketidakmampuan untuk orgasme atau hal-hal lain yang mempengaruhi kesehatan organ reproduksi. Serta dapat menghidupkan kembali peran aparat penegak hukum dan lembaga pendukungnya dalam menyusun dan mengembangkan protokol perlindungan hukum bagi korban KDRT untuk meningkatkan kualitas hidup perempuan, khususnya di wilayah Medan
PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG MENGUBAH DUNIA PEREMPUAN SEBAGAI OBJEK KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA MENJADI PEREMPUAN YANG BERKUALITAS Dahlia K Dewi; Amelia Alsa; Alvi Syahrin; Dewi Ervina Suryani
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v5i2.2951

Abstract

Melindungi perempuan dapat membatasi dan menghapuskan segala tindak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, sama dengan dijelaskan dalam Undang-Undang Penghapusan KDRT Nomor 23 Tahun 2004, yang juga dapat membangun perlindungan hukum untuk menciptakan keluarga yang harmonis dan reformasi pemerintahan yang adil. Untuk lebih melindungi perempuan di Indonesia, khususnya di Binjai. Pusat Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak di Binjai merupakan penelitian tentang kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di wilayah ini dilakukan dengan memakai metode penelitian hukum standar, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dan ditarik kesimpulan bahwa hasil penelitian tentang kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Menurut penelitian, selama pandemi Covid-19, banyak kejahatan KDRT yang terjadi di dalam rumah tangga atau umumnya dianggap KDRT yang dilakukan oleh pasangan, dan objeknya sebagian besar adalah perempuan atau suami. Di bawah pengaruh kekerasan fisik, tekanan mental dan psikologis, kesehatan reproduksi terganggu secara biologis hingga akhirnya terganggu secara sosiologis. Oleh karena itu, pemerintah kota Binjai dapat memberikan informasi tentang kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, perawatan fisik korban dan merekomendasikan pusat perempuan dalam krisis dengan bantuan penegak hukum dan lembaga pendukung, yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas hidup perempuan dengan melindungi hak perempuan di Binjai.