Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

0.983

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Patrika JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia KERTHA WICAKSANA Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Focus Journal Law Review

I Dewa Made Suartha

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Author-ID : 386699

Humanities Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DI INDONESIA I Dewa Made Suartha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 4 (2016)
Publisher : University of Udayana

The acceptance of corporation as the subject of criminal act brings problem to criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility. There are 2 principle problems in this study : (1) How is the current criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility?. (2) How is criminal law policy upon the corporation criminal act responsibility in ius constituendum perspective? The research used normative law method with legislation, comparative and law concept analysis approaches. The result of the research : (1) Criminal code has not regulates corporation as the subject of criminal act that is accountable for criminal law, nevertheless it is partial but inconsistent, (2) Criminal Code Bill 1999-2000 has clearly and completely regulated corporation as subject of criminal act and is accountable for criminal law and accept unconditional criminal responsibility as well as substitute criminal responsibility, although with the exception to solve difficult problem in order to prove mistakes made by corporation. Diterimanya korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana, dapat menimbulkan permasalahan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan pokok, yaitu (1) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana pada saat ini dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi?. (2) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum ? Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian adalah : (1) KUHP tidak mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana sedangkan di beberapa perundang-undangan di luar KUHP telah mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana, namun masih bersifat parsial dan tidak konsisten, (2) Rancangan KUHP 2014-2015 telah mengatur secara lengkap dan tegas korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan menerima pertanggungjawaban pidana mutlak serta pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti, meskipun dengan pengecualian untuk memecahkan persoalan kesulitan dalam membuktikan adanya unsur kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh korporasi.

PELAKSANAAN TUGAS DAN WEWENANG HAKIM PENGAWAS DAN PENGAMAT PENGADILAN NEGERI DENPASAR DALAM PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA I Dewa Made Suartha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 3 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : University of Udayana

How is the implementation of duties and authorities of supervisors andobservers judges of Denpasar District Court in founding the convict? What areobstacles that occur in implementation of duties and authorities of supervisorsand observers judges of Denpasar District Court in founding the convict? The method used in this research was empirical legal research. Itscharacteristic is descriptive. The data sources that used are primary data,secondary data and tertiary data. The primary data / field data were obtained byinterviewing the relevant law enforcement officer that has been determined as asample. The secondary data were obtained of literature studies. The data wasanalyzed by qualitative descriptive analysis to get the vivid conclusion anddescription in discussing the problems in this research. Conclusions derived from this study include: implementation of duties andauthorities of supervisors and observers judges of Denpasar District Court infounding the convict are not running optimally in accordance with the legislationin force. The factor that obstruct are the numbers of supervisors and observersjudges of Denpasar District Court were not adequate, that was one person, therewas no special fund (Operational fund) and there were no strict sanctions forthose when they could not do the duties according to the applicable law; theycould only appeal to the law enforcement agencies / officers of Class IIADenpasar Penitentiary founding the convict.

Co-Authors Adi Wiraditya, Gede Gilang Adia Pratistia Aditya Saputra Anak Agung Gede Agung Dwi Saputra Caroline Andarini Dyah Ayu Puspitasari Dibyo Prabowo DUDUT RUSTYADI Gusti Ayu Putu Yindri Laksmiwiyani I Dewa Agung Gede Mahardhika Martha I Dewa Agung Gede Mahardika Martha I Gust i Ngurah Wairocana I Gusti Agung Angga Mahavira I Gusti Agung Ayu Laksmi Astri I Ketut Keneng I Ketut Sudjana I Made Adi Suryawan I Made Bayu Wiguna I Wayan Bela Siki Layang I Wayan Tangun Susila I.N. Wahyu Saptahadi Ida Ayu Bintari Yuditara Ida Ayu Kade Kusumaningrum Jared Ivory Liliana Listiawatie Martha, I Dewa Agung Gede Mahardika Maya Septia Budi Ayu Ningtias Ni Luh Kadek Rai Surya Dewi Ni Luh Putu Diah Rumika Dewi Ni Made Kusuma Wardhani Ni Nengah Adiyaryani Ni Putu Renanda Apriliani Dewati Putu Diah Indriyani Putu Yudik Adisurya Lesmana Tri Yanti Merlyn Christin Pardede Wawan Edi Prastiyo Windu Adiningsih

Title Search

Found 2 Documents Search Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA