Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humaniora Paramita: Historical Studies Journal Mozaik Humaniora Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha Bakti Budaya: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Bakti Budaya: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia
Tular Sudarmadi
Faculty Of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Humaniora

 1 
A SEMIOTIC APPROACH ON INDONESIAN MEGALITHS STUDY Tular Sudarmadi
Humaniora Vol 11, No 3 (1999)
Publisher : Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (688.453 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jh.673

Abstract

Megalithic structures in Indonesia have their own unique characteristics, compared with elsewhere, because of the influences of Indian, Arabic, and European cultures, as well as local developments . They exhibit great variation in shape, size and degree of complexity. Perry (1918), Hoop (1935), Geldern (1945), Heekeren (1958) and Soejono (1984) have identified stone tables (dolmen), slabs, coffins, menhirs, enclosures (watu kandang/- watu temu gelang), statues, pits (batu dakon), paved paths, upright statues, terraced platforms, jars, seats, elliptical coffins, rectangular coffins, chamber graves, cubic coffins (waruga), vat coffins and thrones (pelinggih) . Geldern (1945, p . 149) concluded that there were two main waves of megalithic culture in Indonesia . He connected the first wave, during the Neolithic period from 2500 to 1500 BC with Austronesian speakers, who utilized the quadrangular adze . These people constructed megalithic tables, menhir, terraced platforms, pits, and seats . The second wave, during the Bronze-Iron period from 300 to 100 BC, produced slab, elliptical, cubic and rectangular coffins, chamber graves and statues. While accepting Heine- Geldern's basic hypothesis, later researchers suggested that the two main waves of megalithic culture became intermingled and developed local variations (Heekeren 1958, p . 44) .
Love Me, Love Me Not: The Florenese Struggle in the Indonesian Nation State Project of Nation Unity Tular Sudarmadi
Humaniora Vol 23, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3127.944 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jh.1015

Abstract

lndonesian nation state develops project of nation unity to share imagined past and to offer a future dream. In this process, the nation with its power and authority invents, reinvents and creates collective memory by attaching meaning to cultural heritage, both tangible -sacred artifacts, monuments, sites and landscapes- and intangible -national history, religious celebration, nation day commemoration and collective memory-. However, when this collective memory is associated with the cultural heritage of major ethnic group, it marginalizes, subordinates and denies the heritage of ethnic groups outside the core. In response to the state ignorance, the minor ethnic groups develop various ways to attach and include on the nation state project of nation unity. In this article I discuss the Florenese marginalize ethnic in lndonesian nation state struggle to be granting the status of homogeneity and belonging to the Indonesian nation state citizen.
Co-Authors Agus Suwignyo Hermin Indah Wahyuni Yuliantri, Rhoma Dwi Aria