Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Caraka Prabu : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Annisa Dwi Lestari
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DESA TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA DI DESA TANJUNGSARI KECAMATAN SUKALUYU KABUPATEN CIANJUR Annisa Dwi Lestari; Dadan Kurnia; Agustina Setiawan
Jurnal Caraka Prabu Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Caraka Prabu
Publisher : Universitas Jenderal Ahmad Yani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36859/jcp.v3i2.354

Abstract

The title of this research is “Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Desa Tentang Pembentukan Badan Usaha Milik Desa Di Desa Tanjungsari Kecamatan Sukaluyu Kabupaten Cianjur”. This research uses descriptive method with qualitative approach that is to give a description about the problem in this research. With 7 informants, there are: The Headman of Tanjungsari Village, The Director of BUMDes, The Head Financial Unit of BUMDes,The Head of Service Section of Tanjungsari Village, The Head of Village Economic Institute DPMD Kab. Cianjur, The Head of Karang Taruna, and The Head of RT 002 RW 001 as Tanjungsari Village community. The results represented that the Implementation of Village Government Policy About Badan Usaha Milik Desa in Tanjungsari Village Sukaluyu Cianjur has not been optimally. This was because (1) the policy objectives that BUMDes Tanjungsari Village has not been able to empower the entire village community, (2) the existing BUMDes lack in terms of quantity and quality of human resource then executives tend to stuck in with their respective jobs so that in implementing the policy of the Village Government about Badan Usaha Milik Desa was not followed by the development of a good business type. (3) Financial resources that cannot be develop all the types of business, (4) Characteristics of implementing agencies BUMdes different, (5) the existence of non-compliance attitude of the policy implementers (6) lack of communication between Organization and Activity Executor, (7) the external environment consisting of the political, social and economic environment in the tanjungsari village runs conducive. Keywords : Policy Implementation, BUMDes
Restrictions on Judicial Review Rights for State Administrative Officials: A Critical Perspective on Constitutional Court Deci-sion No. 24/PUU-XXII/2024 Annisa Dwi Lestari; Taufiqurrohman Syahuri; Ahmad Ahsin Thohari
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i3.688

Abstract

Restricting judicial review (peninjauan kembali) for state administrative officials through Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XXII/2024 represents a pivotal shift in Indonesia’s administrative justice framework. This study critically examines the constitutional, theoretical, and comparative dimensions of that decision, situating it within the principles of equality before the law and due process enshrined in the 1945 Constitution. Employing a normative-qualitative design grounded in doctrinal analysis and comparative law methods, the research analyzes primary sources including the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts, Law No. 14 of 1985 on the Supreme Court, and the Constitutional Court’s decision and is supplemented by relevant academic literature. Findings reveal that the decision undermines procedural equality by asymmetrically restricting state entities’ access to extraordinary remedy mechanisms without addressing systemic enforcement deficiencies. Comparative analysis with French, German, and Thai administrative law systems demonstrates that modern rechtsstaat states preserve substantive justice through inclusive access to judicial review while enforcing robust procedural safeguards. The study concludes that targeted institutional reforms such as establishing an autonomous executorial agency, enacting contempt-of-court legislation, strengthening ombudsman oversight, and enhancing judicial education offer more constitutionally sound solutions to improve compliance with administrative court rulings. It further underscores the crucial role of rechtsvinding and proportionality in reconciling procedural limitations with constitutional mandates for substantive justice and legal certainty.
Co-Authors Agustina Setiawan Ahmad Ahsin Thohari Dadan Kurnia Taufiqurrohman Syahuri