Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Global Governance sebagai Agenda Penelitian dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional Sugiono, Muhadi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 8, No 2 (2004): Tinjauan Kritis Globalisasi
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.795 KB)

Abstract

Global governance has entered intellectual debates in the International Relations since early 1990s. What global governance exactly means, however, is still very much debatable. Without ignoring the contentious nature and without aspiring to offer alternative definition of the concept, this article seeks to present ways in which global governance can be best understood. As such, global governance can be seen as a normative project, an idealised global political order to be achieved in order to tame globalization. This view of global governance represents mostly, but not merely, that of practitioners of international relations. At the same time, global governance can also be seen as descriptive and analytical frameworks which can be employed by students of International Relations. While it does not reflects an epistemological breakthrough in the study of international relations, global governance offers a challenging and promising research agenda.
Globalisasi, Global Governance dan Prospek Governance di Dunia Ketiga Sugiono, Muhadi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 8, No 3 (2005): Democratic Governance
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.795 KB)

Abstract

One of the most important theme in the current debates on globalization is the implication of globalization to the state. Two contending positions can immediately be identified: one that argues that globalization results in the retreat of the state and other that argues that globalization is what the states make of it. While it is quite apparent that none of these two positions is satisfactorily defensible, this article presents another problem related to the way in which the state is related to the globalization. Both positions tend to take the state for granted, in that, all states are (western) modern states, without taking into account their history and sociology. As a result, they fail to cacth inside dynamics of political power taking place in the group of states so called the third world and, therefore, lose their releaance.
Paths to Peace: Contending Discourses on Communal Violence and Conflict in the Post-New Order Indonesia Sugiono, Muhadi; Djalong, Frans
PCD Journal Vol 4, No 1-2 (2012): Democratisation: Power and Conflict Relations
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (197.971 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/pcd.25768

Abstract

This paper discusses actual discourses that have shaped the ways in which violent communal conflicts have been understood, and how different practices of interventions have been applied to address the conflicts in the post-New Order Indonesia. The discourses have their own perspectives, practical interventions, and agencies. Against the backdrop of the competing discourses, this paper argues for more attention being paid to local ways of resolving communal conflict despite the accompanying debates on their effectiveness and efficiency.
Globalisasi, 'Global Governance' dan Prospek 'Governance' di Dunia Ketiga Muhadi Sugiono
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 8, No 3 (2005): MARET (Democratic Governance)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1066.564 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.11044

Abstract

One of the most important theme in the current debates on globalization is the implication of globalization to the state. Two contending positions can immediately be identified: one that argues that globalization results in the 'retreat of the state' and other that argues that globalization is 'what the states make of it'. While it is quite apparent that none of these two positions is satisfactorily defensible, this article presents another problem related to the way in which the state is related to the globalization. Both positions tend to take the state for granted, in that, all states are (western) modern states, without taking into account their history and sociology. As a result, they fail to cacth inside dynamics of political power taking place in the group of states so called the third world and, therefore, lose their releaance.
Global Governance sebagai Agenda Penelitian dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional Muhadi Sugiono
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 8, No 2 (2004): NOVEMBER (Tinjauan Kritis Globalisasi)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (534.628 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.11053

Abstract

Global governance has entered intellectual debates in the International Relations since early 1990s. What global governance exactly means, however, is still very much debatable. Without ignoring the contentious nature and without aspiring to offer alternative definition of the concept, this article seeks to present ways in which global governance can be best understood. As such, global governance can be seen as a normative project, an idealised global political order to be achieved in order to tame globalization. This view of global governance represents mostly, but not merely, that of practitioners of international relations. At the same time, global governance can also be seen as descriptive and analytical frameworks which can be employed by students of International Relations. While it does not reflects an epistemological breakthrough in the study of international relations, global governance offers a challenging and promising research agenda.
Brexit, Integrasi Eropa, dan Regionalisme ASEAN Muhadi Sugiono
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 5 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.804 KB)

Abstract

Kemenangan Brexit dalam referendum tanggal 23 Juni 2016 yang lalu menimbulkan spekulasi mengenai disintegrasi Uni Eropa. Banyak orang percaya bahwa keluarnya Inggris dari Uni Eropa akan disusul oleh negara-negara anggota Uni Eropa yang lain. Integrasi regional akan berakhir dengan tragis. Seperti halnya gempa bumi yang meluluh-lantakkan apa yang ada di permukaan bumi, Brexit akan menghancurkan tatanan ekonomi dan politik Eropa yang semakin tersentralisir di Brussel dan mengembalikan kedulatan ke masing-masing negara. Tulisan ini tidak menyangkal bahwa keputusan rakyat Inggris untuk keluar dari Uni Eropa memiliki dampak yang besar bagi Eropa. Memahami Brexit sebagai awal dari disintegrasi Eropa adalah sebuah kesimpulan yang terlalu prematur dan berlebihan. Integrasi regional di Eropa yang telah mengubah interaksi antar negara serta geopolitik di Eropa menjauh dari karakter yang zero-sum terlalu berharga untuk dikorbankan. Tidak ada negara yang siap untuk melakukannya, termasuk Inggris. Bagi ASEAN, Brexit memberikan pelajaran berharga bagi regionalisme yang semakin berkembang di Asia Tenggara.
Brexit, Integrasi Eropa, dan Regionalisme ASEAN Muhadi Sugiono
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 5 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kemenangan Brexit dalam referendum tanggal 23 Juni 2016 yang lalu menimbulkan spekulasi mengenai disintegrasi Uni Eropa. Banyak orang percaya bahwa keluarnya Inggris dari Uni Eropa akan disusul oleh negara-negara anggota Uni Eropa yang lain. Integrasi regional akan berakhir dengan tragis. Seperti halnya gempa bumi yang meluluh-lantakkan apa yang ada di permukaan bumi, Brexit akan menghancurkan tatanan ekonomi dan politik Eropa yang semakin tersentralisir di Brussel dan mengembalikan kedulatan ke masing-masing negara. Tulisan ini tidak menyangkal bahwa keputusan rakyat Inggris untuk keluar dari Uni Eropa memiliki dampak yang besar bagi Eropa. Memahami Brexit sebagai awal dari disintegrasi Eropa adalah sebuah kesimpulan yang terlalu prematur dan berlebihan. Integrasi regional di Eropa yang telah mengubah interaksi antar negara serta geopolitik di Eropa menjauh dari karakter yang zero-sum terlalu berharga untuk dikorbankan. Tidak ada negara yang siap untuk melakukannya, termasuk Inggris. Bagi ASEAN, Brexit memberikan pelajaran berharga bagi regionalisme yang semakin berkembang di Asia Tenggara.
Pemutaran Film ‘Иди и смотри’ Oleh Kedutaan Besar Federasi Rusia Di Jakarta: Perjuangan Anti-Perang Dalam Perang Dunia II Saragih, Hondor; Manurung, Hendra; Pannyiwi, Rahmat; Hutabarat, Erny; Rezasyah, Teuku; Sugiono, Muhadi
Sahabat Sosial: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Sahabat Sosial: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Juni)
Publisher : Asosiasi Guru dan Dosen Seluruh Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59585/sosisabdimas.v2i3.363

Abstract

The film Иди и Cмотри directed by Elem Klimov starring Aleksei Kravchenko and Olga Mironova delivers the anti-war struggle campaign during World War II (WW II) in Belarus. This 142-minute film was released on July 9, 1985, in Belarus (БеларусьФильм) and the Soviets (МосФильм). The gross income obtained reached USS 21 million. The period of Nazi German occupation in Belarus began with the German invasion of the Soviet Union without a declaration of war on June 22, 1941, known as Operation Barbarossa ended in August 1944 with the launch of Operation Bagration by the Soviets. The western part of Byelorussia (1940) became part of the Reichskommissariat Ostland in 1941. The German government in 1943 allowed local collaborators to establish a client state as Belarusian Central Rada existed until the arrival of Soviet troops managed to liberate that region. The Reichskommissariat Ostland was a civil occupation regime established by Nazi Germany in 1941 in the Baltic states such as Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, northeastern Poland, and the western part of the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic during WW II. The German decision to form the Reichskommissariat aimed to 1) exterminate the Jewish population, 2) prepare Lebensraum for the German people, 3) expel the native population, and 4) assimilate the remainder. However, this policy did not only apply to the Reichskommissariat Ostland but was applied to other Soviet territories occupied by Germany. Utilizing Einsatzgruppen A and B assisted by local troops, found more than one million Jews were killed as a result of the formation of the Reichskommissariat Ostland. The results of the German troop's deployment were to invade them by the takeover of large Soviet territories and the deliberate killing of unarmed civilians (genocide). Berlin leaders’ decision indeed has created an unforgettable human tragedy.