Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Luxnos : Jurnal Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Pelita Dunia BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen KAMASEAN: Jurnal Teologi Kristen Sesawi: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen
HENDRIK YUFENGKRI SANDA
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Rajawali Arastamar Indonesia Batam
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN TEOLOGI SISTEMATIS-APOLOGETIS TERHADAP PANDANGAN ADOPSIONISME MENGENAI KETUHANAN YESUS HENDRIK YUFENGKRI SANDA
BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol 1 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI INJILI SETIA SIAU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46558/bonafide.v1i1.6

Abstract

Jesus is a unique person because he has two natures, namely God and Human. The Bible explicitly teaches and testifies on this subject. But in fact, some views reject both His divine nature and even His humanity. These views have been around since Jesus' incarnation in the world until now. One of the teachings which classify as Christian heretics in the early centuries was the adoptionist view, which taught Jesus only human beings who adopt as children of God later. It means they reject the divinity and also the pre-existence of Christ as God before His incarnation. This study intends to criticize the adoptionist idea. The method used is qualitative research through a systematic-apologetic approach. The results showed that the view of adoption was wrong because it violated the principle of the divine nature of Jesus as the Bible teaches. Jesus is Lord from the beginning, not after His incarnation.
Penderitaan, Dosa, dan Pekerjaan-Pekerjaan Allah: Eksegesis Injil Yohanes 9:2-4 Hendrik Yufengkri Sanda
KAMASEAN: Jurnal Teologi Kristen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Kamasean : Jurnal Teologi Kristen
Publisher : Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Toraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (954.384 KB) | DOI: 10.34307/kamasean.v1i1.1

Abstract

Consequences of the sinful acts, but there are also those who understand it as part of God's plan to reveal His work. The dualism of this opinion appears in the narrative in the Gospel of John 9: 1-7. The disciples gave such cynical questions about the suffering that has been experienced by the blind man as a consequence of the sin that was committed, but the Lord Jesus actually denied that through that suffering, the work of God should be made manifest in him. Which is right? What is the purpose of Jesus' argument? Why does he think so? Answering these questions, the researcher will use an exegetical approach to the text of the Gospel of John 9:2-4. This method is very important to research the purpose of Jesus' statement to the disciples' questions about the suffering of the blind man. This research finds the meaning of Jesus' argue which emphasizes how are the correct understanding and a real action towards the suffering of others. Penderitaan yang dialami seseorang sering dikaitkan dengan konsekuensi dari perbuatan dosa namun ada juga yang memahaminya sebagai bagian dari rencana Allah untuk menyatakan karya-Nya. Dualisme pandangan ini tampak dalam narasi di dalam Injil Yohanes 9:1-7. Para murid memberikan pertanyaan yang begitu sinis mengenai penderitaan yang dialami orang buta merupakan akibat dari dosa yang telah dilakukan, tetapi Tuhan Yesus justru menyanggah bahwa melalui penderitaan itu, karya Allah akan dinyatakan di dalamnya. Manakah yang benar? Apakah maksud argumen Yesus itu? Mengapa Ia berpendapat demikian? Menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan tersebut, peneliti akan menggunakan pendekatan eksegetikal pada teks Injil Yohanes 9:2-4. Metode ini sangat penting untuk meneliti maksud pernyataan Yesus terhadap pertanyaan para murid mengenai penderitaan orang yang buta tersebut. Penelitian ini menemukan makna pendapat Yesus yang menekankan bagaimana pemahaman yang benar dan sikap yang nyata terhadap penderitaan yang dialami oleh orang lain.
KAJIAN TERHADAP KISAH PARA RASUL 10:34-36: UNTUK MENJAWAB PANDANGAN PLURALIS MENGENAI YESUS TUHAN SEMUA ORANG Hendrik Yufengkri Sanda
BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol 4 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI INJILI SETIA SIAU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46558/bonafide.v4i1.168

Abstract

Iman Kristen unik dari semua bentuk kepercayaan manapun di dunia, sebab iman Kristen percaya bahwa Yesus adalah Tuhan dan satu-satunya Juruselamat manusia. Klaim eksklusif tersebut menimbulkan berbagai macam pertanyaan: Bagaimana dengan segala bentuk kepercayaan yang lain? Bukankah hal itu merupakan suatu anggapan yang subjektif berdasarkan semangat fanatisme agama dan sikap arogansi yang berlebihan mentuhankan seorang manusia Yesus? Bukankah benar anggapan para teolog pluralis agama-agama bahwa di semua agama juga memiliki kebenaran dan juruselamat lain sehingga dapat memimpin kepada keselamatan tanpa perlu percaya kepada Yesus? Bukankah Yesus yang disembah orang Kristen hanyalah Tuhan bagi mereka saja sebab dalam agama-agma lainpun memiliki tuhan yang lain? Dan masih banyak pertanyan lainnya. Penelitian ini bermaksud memahami makna asli dari ungkapan rasul Petrus bahwa Yesus Kristus Tuhan semua orang. Metode yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutis. Berdasarkan hasil eksegesis terhadap teks Kis.10:34-36 maka Frasa Yesus Kristus Tuhan semua orang berarti Yesus Kristus adalah Tuhan yang berkuasa atas seluruh ciptaan-Nya sehingga Ia layak disembah sebagai Tuhan dan Juruselamat manusia.
KETAKSALAHAN ALKITAB: KAJIAN BIBLIS DAN SISTEMATIS TERHADAP KRITIK FILSUF MODERN DAN TEOLOG LIBERAL Sanda, Hendrik Yufengkri; Koanak, Ivoni Arisandi Kristina
Sesawi Vol 6, No 1 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sabda Agung, Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53687/sjtpk.v6i1.290

Abstract

Pandangan Orthodoks mengakui bahwa Alkitab merupakan firman Allah yang berotoritas serta sebagai standar kebenaran. Namun pada kenyataanya ada juga pandangan-pandangan dari para filsuf modern dan para teolog liberal menolak anggapan ini. Menurut mereka Alkitab memiliki kesalahan-kesalahan serta ketidaksesuaian-ketidaksesuaian baik dalam hal sejarah maupun Ilmu pengetahuan. Singkatnya, Alkitab bertentangan dengan Ilmu pengetahuan. Anggapan bahwa Alkitab memiliki kesalahan karena ditulis oleh manusia yang memiliki keterbatasan dan kelemahan. Sehingga di dalam penelitian ini, peneliti bertujuan memberikan elaborasi untuk mengkaji pandangan mereka. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah library research  dengan  pendekatan  biblis-sistematis.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa semua anggapan para filsuf modern dan teolog liberal ditolak karena di dalam Alkitab tidak terdapat kesalahan (innerancy). Sebab para nabi maupun rasul secara langsung mendapatkan pengilhaman dari Roh Kudus untuk menuliskan firman sehingga tidak mungkin terdapat kesalahan. Kesalahan yang ada hanyalah terdapat pada naskah salinan-salinan bukan pada naskah asli (autografe). Selain itu juga kurangnya memperhatikan teks dan konteks, serta prinsip-prinsip dalam penafsiran Alkitab membuat salah memahami maksud firman Tuhan. Dengan demikian Alkitab tidak bertentangan dengan sejarah maupun ilmu pengetahuan melainkan semakin meneguhkan kebenarannya.
Interpretasi Makna Frasa “Sisa Israel” Menurut Roma 11:5-10 Sanda, Hendrik Yufengkri; Kudati, Elsa Ayudia
JURNAL LUXNOS Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): LUXNOS: JURNAL SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI PELITA DUNIA EDISI JUNI 2025
Publisher : STT Pelita Dunia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47304/7qx92321

Abstract

The phrase "Remnant of Israel" in Romans 11:5-10 is a theological concept that is often debated in New Testament studies. Some interpreters understand this phrase to refer to the ethnic remnant of Israel who remain faithful to God, while others interpret it as believers from various nations who are chosen by God through grace. This article aims to interpret the meaning of the phrase "Remnant of Israel" in the context of Romans 11:5-10 using an exegetical approach and biblical textual analysis. The results of the study show that the phrase "Remnant of Israel" in Romans 11:5-10 has two dimensions of meaning. First, it refers to the Jews who remain faithful to God, as happened in the time of Elijah when God preserved 7,000 people who did not worship Baal. Second, Paul expands this concept by linking it to God's grace, which allows not only the ethnic remnant of Israel, but also believers from other nations to become part of God's chosen people. Thus, the "Remnant of Israel" is not only limited to physical Israel, but also includes spiritual Israel, namely the church that believes in Jesus Christ as the Messiah. Study affirms that God's election is not based on human effort or goodness, but solely by His grace. This understanding has theological relevance for believers today, especially in understanding the relationship between Israel and the church in God's plan of salvation.
MEMPERTAHANKAN OTORITAS ALKITAB DI ERA POSTMODERN: KRITIK RELATIVISME DAN TAWARAN HERMENEUTIKA KONTEKSTUAL Koanak, Ivoni Arisandi Kristina; Sanda, Hendrik Yufengkri
BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI INJILI SETIA SIAU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46558/bonafide.v6i1.366

Abstract

In the postmodern era, views on the Bible are challenged by changes in cultural paradigms, philosophy, and the way people think. Traditionally, the Bible, which is considered an authoritative and absolute source, is often questioned or reinterpreted based on the framework of individual subjectivity. Postmodernism shifts the focus from objective understanding to personal and subjective interpretation. Postmodernists see the Bible as a cultural narrative that is open to various interpretations, without recognizing a single truth. A more narrative and relational approach, as well as recognition of plurality of views, can be used to reach individuals who feel alienated by an overly dogmatic approach. The method used in this study is qualitative research with a descriptive-analytical approach. The results of the study show that the views of postmodernists are wrong because they are built on the principles of subjectivism, pluralism, relativism and skepticism. The Bible in the postmodern world requires an adaptive approach but still adheres to solid theological principles. The church and Christian communities must continue to explore creative ways to explain the relevance of the Bible as the living word of God in a changing culture.
Analisis Eksegetis Makna Transfigurasi Yesus Menurut Injil Markus 9:2-8 Dan Implikasinya Bagi Orang Percaya Suerandi, Dedi; Sanda, Hendrik Yufengkri
JURNAL LUXNOS Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): LUXNOS: JURNAL SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI PELITA DUNIA EDISI DESEMBER 2025
Publisher : STT Pelita Dunia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47304/chm8h926

Abstract

The transfiguration of Jesus in Mark 9:2-8 is a crucial moment in the Gospels that affirms Jesus' divine identity as the glorified Son of God and the redeemer of mankind. The importance of this study is motivated by the frequent historical-theological misunderstandings regarding the transfiguration, where some parties overemphasize His human nature, while others focus too much on His divine nature, resulting in an unbalanced teaching. The main objective of this study is to analyze the text of Mark 9:2-8 exegetically to uncover the deep theological meaning behind the event and its relevant implications for the lives of believers today. This study uses a qualitative method with an exegetical analysis approach. The study shows that the transfiguration was a revelation of Christ's glory before His suffering on the cross, serving as a confirmation of the disciples' faith. The presence of Moses and Elijah symbolized the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets' Prophecies in Jesus. The voice of God the Father from the cloud affirmed Jesus' divine authority and demanded absolute obedience to Him. Implicatively, the transfiguration calls believers today to listen to and obey Christ, live a faith centered on His cross and resurrection, and hold fast to the hope of future glory. This event serves as a powerful invitation to strengthen faith and direct all aspects of life toward the glory of Christ amidst the challenges of our times.
Co-Authors Koanak, Ivoni Arisandi Kristina Kudati, Elsa Ayudia Suerandi, Dedi