Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials

Mechanical Properties Analysis of Stainless Steel 304 Linear Guide Rail Using Autodesk Inventor and MATLAB Azizi, Muhammad; Kurniawan, Kurniawan; Khaerudini, Deni Shidqi; Timuda, Gerald Ensang; Darsono, Nono; Chollacoop, Nuwong
International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials Vol 7, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22441/ijimeam.v7i1.25355

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical properties of a stainless steel 304 linear guide rail using a combination of Autodesk Inventor and MATLAB. The primary objective is to analyze the von Mises stress distribution, displacement, and safety factor of the linear guide rail under varying load conditions, as well as to develop a model representing the relationship between stress and strain. A detailed 3D model of the guide rail was created using Autodesk Inventor, followed by finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate stress and strain distribution across different sections of the rail. The simulation was conducted to assess the structural response under multiple loading scenarios, ensuring its reliability for real-world applications. Furthermore, a linear regression analysis was performed using MATLAB to establish a predictive model correlating stress and strain, enabling more accurate forecasting of the material's mechanical behavior. The results revealed that the maximum von Mises stress obtained from the simulation was 23.595 MPa, with a corresponding maximum displacement of 0.397 mm. The safety factor analysis confirmed the rail's structural integrity, with a minimum safety factor of 10.595, well above the failure threshold. These findings indicate that the linear guide rail meets the necessary mechanical performance requirements for its intended application.
Correlation Analysis of Battery Capacity, Range, and Charging Time in Electric Vehicles Using Pearson Correlation and MATLAB Regression Sanusi, Yasa; Pudjiwati, Sri; Tarigan, Kontan; Ginting, Dianta; Adnan, Farrah Anis Fazliatun; Timuda, Gerald Ensang; Darsono, Nono; Chollacoop, Nuwong; Khaerudini, Deni Shidqi
International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials Vol 7, No 3 (2025): Article in Press
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22441/ijimeam.v7i3.31800

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) reflects growing global awareness of climate change and air pollution challenges. As a sustainable alternative to conventional internal combustion vehicles, EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions and can significantly reduce carbon emissions—particularly when powered by renewable energy sources. However, one of the primary barriers to widespread EV adoption remains the high cost of battery components, which are essential to vehicle performance and energy storage. In Indonesia, two dominant battery types used in EVs are Lithium Ferro Phosphate (LFP) and Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC), each offering distinct advantages. LFP batteries are recognized for their thermal stability and longer life cycles, making them suitable for everyday use, while NMC batteries offer higher energy density and are preferred for performance-focused and long-distance applications. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between battery capacity, driving range, and charging time for LFP and NMC batteries using Pearson correlation and regression analysis through MATLAB simulation. The results indicate a strong and statistically significant correlation among the key parameters, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.576 for battery capacity and range, and an R-square value of 0.99 for the regression model, demonstrating high predictive accuracy. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that LFP batteries have a higher average energy efficiency of 7.53 km/kWh compared to 6.84 km/kWh for NMC batteries, indicating more consistent performance in energy usage. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing battery selection in EV applications and contribute to strategic planning for the development of more efficient electric vehicle systems. The combination of statistical and simulation-based analysis provides a robust foundation for future research and policy-making in the field of electric mobility.