Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.642
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Arbitrer Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Journal on Education Jurdimas (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Royal Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Lesson Journal Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed) J-ABDIPAMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)
Shally Amna
Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Universitas Putra Indonesia “YPTK” Padang
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)

 1 
INDENTIFYING PRAGMATIC FAILURES IN DIALOGUE SCRIPTS OF EFL LEARNERS Shally Amna
Journal Of Language Education and Development (JLed) Vol 1 No 1 (2018): Vol 1 No 1 November (2018): Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52060/jled.v1i1.71

Abstract

Most of the EFL learners consciously or unconsciously speak English using the same way they communicate their native languages which have different patterns and cultural backgrounds. In writing English dialogue scripts, most students in West Sumatera province transfer their mother languages to national language first and then to English language. As a result, beyond many spelling and syntactic errors found in the scripts, pragmatic failures are the most dominant issues captured. The students’ pragmatics failures are categorized into pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic failures in accordance with Jenny Thomas (1983). This present study provides overviews of phenomenon in EFL dialogue scripts made by students of UPI YPTK Padang. It investigated students from 6 classes who have learned basic English in the previous semester. The students are asked to make a simple dialogue in groups with certain chosen topics and are allowed to use dictionary if necessary. The study showed that the students limitation of English language proficiency and pragmatic transfer result in pragmalinguistic failures such as failure to follow the native expressive habit, misunderstanding of words, use English with semantics and structure of students’s mother tongues, verbose verbs and that sociopragmatic failure lies in perception and expression of local pragmatic conventions.
A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE USED IN THE LECTURE OF USTAD ABDUL SOMAD LC.MA. Shally Amna
Journal Of Language Education and Development (JLed) Vol 1 No 2 (2019): Vol 1 No 2 July (2019): Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52060/jled.v1i2.135

Abstract

The research is aimed to analyze a discourse of figurative languages used in the lecture of Ustad Abdul Somad, LC.MA. (UAS) which is held in Pasaman District, West Sumatera province.The research is qualitatively descriptive approached. In conducting the research, the data are collected by using documentation technique. The data are categorized by referring to Perrine’s category namely personification, metaphor, hyperbole and paradox. The Data are transcript from Indonesian language into English language. To analyze the data, the research uses discourse analysis and descriptive method. The findings of the research are 98 expressions of figurative languages found in the lecture of UAS for 70 minutes namely 34.6 % the expressions of paradox, 25.5% the expressions of hyperbole, 20.4% the expression of metaphor and 19.3 % the expression of personification. These figures are analyzed by using the context of the utterances.
Co-Authors Annisha Dyuli Adha Annisha Dyuli Adha Annisha Dyuli Adha Desi Afrianti Dian Christina Dian Christina Dwi Megista Putri Rasmita Rasmita Selfa Idriani Wienda Gusta Wienda Gusta Yeng Primawati