Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Filsafat

RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Lailiy Muthmainnah; Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3421

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3526

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
Konsep Materialitas-Spiritualitas dalam Historisitas Pierre Teilhard De Chardin Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31653

Abstract

Teilhard memandang kesadaran diri pada manusia sebagai perkembangan aspek spiritualitas yang didukung aspek materialitas.