Fatah Nasikh Aryawan
Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jawa Timur

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Teaching The Indonesian Language As A Heritage Language For Diaspora Children Rizki Putri Ramadhani; Fendy Yogha Pratama; Fatah Nasikh Aryawan
SPEKTRUM: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (PLS) Vol 10, No 2 (2022): SPEKTRUM: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (PLS): Publishing May 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/spektrumpls.v10i2.117419

Abstract

Indonesian diaspora children have different characteristics compared to foreign students in general. They have acquired Indonesian naturally in their families. This background makes them included in the category of learners of Indonesian as a heritage language. The teaching of Indonesian that is done to them also has special characteristics. Therefore, this study specifically focuses on the characteristics of teaching Indonesian as a heritage language for diaspora children by using a qualitative approach and descriptive analysis. The data obtained through in-depth interviews with three teachers were then codified and analyzed. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the teaching in the Indonesian language as a heritage language class for these children has four characteristics. First, the teaching uses the total physical response (TPR) method. Second, it focuses on teaching daily vocabulary. Third, it focuses on teaching daily language skills. Fourth, teaching is assisted by the role of parents. Suggestions and recommendations from the results of this study are intended for Indonesian language teachers and researchers.  Researchers should research more about the role of parents in learning Indonesian for diaspora children in the family. For Indonesian language teachers, it is recommended to focus on teaching daily vocabulary in everyday contexts using the TPR method.Keywords: heritage language, young learners, Indonesian diaspora, Indonesian language teaching
Models and Strategies for BIPA Teacher Training (2009–2024): A Systematic Review of Southeast Asia and the United States Alim Harun Pamungkas; Rizki Putri Ramadhani; Rodolfo Soares; Bunga Febrimora Hendri; Fatah Nasikh Aryawan; Putra Ramadani; Anggi Firmanjaya Saputra
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 18, No 1 (2026): MARCH 2026
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9157

Abstract

Law No. 24/2009 positions Bahasa Indonesia as a prospective international language and promotes Bahasa Indonesia untuk Penutur Asing (BIPA) as a strategic instrument of cultural diplomacy. However, empirical evidence on effective training models for teachers and learners across international contexts remains fragmented. This study synthesizes research on BIPA training models and their pedagogical implementation in Southeast Asia and the United States from 2009 to 2024.A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 protocol. Searches in Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar (March 2024) yielded 312 records. After screening and eligibility assessment based on predefined criteria, 15 studies were included. Study quality was appraised using the MMAT (2018), and findings were analyzed through weighted thematic synthesis.The evidence is dominated by Indonesia-based studies with international orientation (n=9), followed by Southeast Asia (n=3), the United States (n=2), and transnational contexts (n=1). Three major thematic clusters emerged: (1) curriculum standardization, particularly CEFR adaptation; (2) technology-oriented professional development; and (3) exchange and mentoring models. Distinct contextual logics were identified, with Southeast Asia emphasizing regional integration and institutional expansion, while the United States focuses on sustaining Less Commonly Taught Languages (LCTLs).Effective internationalization of BIPA requires networked teacher professional development integrating TPACK frameworks and mentoring, alongside shared curriculum repositories aligned with CEFR and local cultural contexts. However, the limited and predominantly descriptive evidence base—especially in the U.S. context—suggests that findings remain provisional. Further empirical and comparative research is needed to strengthen global BIPA training models and policy implementation.