Rayhan Rizky Fitrianto
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KONSTRUKSI HUKUM TRANSAKSI “MYSTERY BOX” DITINJAU DARI ASPEK HUKUM PERJANJIAN Rayhan Rizky Fitrianto
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2022
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Rayhan Rizky Fitrianto, Rachmi Sulistyarini, Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya Jl. MT. Haryono No.169, Malang e-mail: rayhan.riv@gmail.com ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan menemukan bentuk konstruksi hukum transaksi “Mystery Box” yang ditinjau dari hukum perjanjian. Dalam melakukan transaksi Mystery Box, para pihak tentunya telah sepakat dengan adanya suatu perjanjian yang merupakan transaksi. Penulis dalam melakukan penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif Kemudian dalam ini, perlu di klasifikasikan berdasarkan karaktersitik transaksi kotak misteri terkait unsur apa yang sekiranya sesuai dengan pelaksanaan transaksi tersebut. Setelah penulis melakukan penelitian terhadap setiap unsur yang ada pada hukum perjanjian sebagaimana yang diatur pada buku ke III dari Kitab Undang - Undang Hukum Perdata, bahwa walaupun sistem atau teknis dari transaksi kotak misteri ini memiliki sifat yang tidak pasti sebagaimana pengertian dan unsurnya dijelaskan pada makna dari perjanjian untung untungan dalam hal perjudian atau pertaruhan, namun pada penerapannya hanya sebatas permainan, pertandingan, perlombaan, dan kejadian kejadian yang belum pasti hasilnya. Maka transaksi dari kotak misteri ini tidak termasuk atau bukan merupakan perjanjian untung-untungan, mengingat walaupun sifatnya yang belum pasti, tetapi terdapat suatu unsur yang berupa terjadinya suatu kesepakatan untuk melakukan transaksi yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha dan konsumen. Unsur yang dimaksud penulis dalam hal ini adalah terpenuhinya unsur dari perjanjian jual beli sesuai dengan pasal 1457 KUHPerdata, yaitu terdapatnya penyerahan sesuatu kebendaan yang disampaikan oleh pelaku usaha dalam pelaksanaan prestasi, dan konsumen yang melakukan pembayaran sejumlah harga yang telah disepakati demi terlaksananya transaksi kotak misteri tersebut sebagaimana yang telah menjadi kesepakatan para pihak. Ketika terdapat kepastian mengenai konstruksi hukum dalam transaksi kotak misteri tersebut maka, dalam hal ini konsumen dapat memahami terkait perlindungan hukum, pertanggung jawaban hukum, serta akibat hukum dari transaksi kotak misteri. Kata Kunci: Konstruksi Hukum, Mystery Box, Hukum Perjanjian ABSTRACT This research aims to investigate the legal construction of “mystery box” transactions seen from the perspective of contract law based on normative-juridical methods. This transaction should involve the agreement of the parties concerned. This research also classified the characteristics of the transaction to figure out what aspects or elements that fit this transaction. Following the analysis of each aspect as governed in Book III of the Civil Code, this research has found out that although the transaction system in the mystery box refers to uncertainty and its aspects are detailed in the definition of speculating agreement as in gambling activities, this gambling is not more than just a game with no certain values ones can earn. Thus, the transaction in the mystery box has the elements that ensure this is a speculating agreement because an agreement takes place between a consumer and owner despite the uncertainty and the chance of speculation. These elements or aspects ensure that there is an agreement under which a transaction takes place as in Article 1457 of Civil Law, marked by the transfer of a tangible object performed by the business owner and the payment of a cost by the consumer as agreed upon to allow the transaction to take place as agreed by the two parties. When there is a certainty of the legal construction in the transaction of the mystery box, the consumer should understand the legal protection, liability, and legal consequences caused by the mystery box transaction. Keywords: legal construction, mystery box, contract law
Incomplete Regulations of Mediator Competence Standards As A Requirement For Members of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agencies Rayhan Rizky Fitrianto; Hamidi Masykur; Yenny Eta Widyanti
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.298

Abstract

This thesis examines the incompleteness of the mediator competency standards set in the Minister of Trade Regulation No. 72 of 2020 as a requirement for members of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK). The regulation does not explicitly stipulate mandatory training or certification of mediators for BPSK members, thus opening up the possibility of mediation being carried out by parties without a legal background or mediation skills. This has an impact on the low quality of dispute resolution, injustice for the parties, and decreased public trust in BPSK as a dispute resolution institution. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. Based on the analysis, the absence of mediator competency regulations causes legal uncertainty (Gustav Radbruch's Theory of Legal Certainty) and violations of the principle of distributive justice (Aristotle). As a solution, this thesis recommends the reconstruction of Minister of Trade Regulation No. 72 of 2020 by adopting the German legal system model, namely requiring mediator certification and the imposition of administrative sanctions for violations. This proposal is in line with the civil law system and Philipus M. Hadjon's theory of authority, which emphasizes the importance of proportionality and professionalism in the implementation of public authority.