Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)
Hamidi Masykur
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Incomplete Regulations of Mediator Competence Standards As A Requirement For Members of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agencies Rayhan Rizky Fitrianto; Hamidi Masykur; Yenny Eta Widyanti
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.298

Abstract

This thesis examines the incompleteness of the mediator competency standards set in the Minister of Trade Regulation No. 72 of 2020 as a requirement for members of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK). The regulation does not explicitly stipulate mandatory training or certification of mediators for BPSK members, thus opening up the possibility of mediation being carried out by parties without a legal background or mediation skills. This has an impact on the low quality of dispute resolution, injustice for the parties, and decreased public trust in BPSK as a dispute resolution institution. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. Based on the analysis, the absence of mediator competency regulations causes legal uncertainty (Gustav Radbruch's Theory of Legal Certainty) and violations of the principle of distributive justice (Aristotle). As a solution, this thesis recommends the reconstruction of Minister of Trade Regulation No. 72 of 2020 by adopting the German legal system model, namely requiring mediator certification and the imposition of administrative sanctions for violations. This proposal is in line with the civil law system and Philipus M. Hadjon's theory of authority, which emphasizes the importance of proportionality and professionalism in the implementation of public authority.
The Legal Framework Construction For Regulating Non-Judge Mediators Outside The Court Azahra Hajar Gautama; Reka Dewantara; Hamidi Masykur
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i2.308

Abstract

This thesis discusses the basic legal construction of the regulation of non-judgmental mediators outside the court, with a focus on the incompleteness of the regulations in Articles 4, 11, and 36 of Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016. These provisions do not adequately regulate the position, authority, and responsibilities of non-judgmental mediators, thus creating legal uncertainty and potentially weakening the legitimacy of non-litigation mediation results. This study aims to answer two research problems: (1) the urgency of establishing legal regulations regarding non-judgmental mediators outside the court; and (2) the appropriate basic legal construction for the regulation. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that the urgency of establishing new regulations lies in the need to guarantee legal certainty, strengthen the position of mediators, and increase the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution. Based on Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty, the current regulations do not fulfill the principle of legal certainty. Therefore, it is necessary to amend Articles 11 and 36 of Perma No. 1 of 2016, which covers the qualifications, legal status, accreditation, supervision, code of ethics, and accountability of non-judge mediators. This construction is based on Singapore's Mediation Act 2017 and analyzed using Maria Farida's legal theory. This proposal is expected to provide legal certainty and strengthen the non-litigation mediation system in Indonesia.
Legal Certainity of The Probationary Period Regulation For Employees of Regional Water Company ratnawati; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hamidi Masykur
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 5 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v5i3.289

Abstract

The legal conflict regarding the probationary period between the Employment Law and the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation concerns the regulation of the probationary period, where the Employment Law stipulates that the probationary period should not exceed 3 (three) months. However, the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation states a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 6 months for the probationary period. Based on this, the research question of this paper is formulated as follows: What are the provisions of the Probationary Period in Article 33 Paragraph (2) of the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation on the Organization and Personnel of Regional Drinking Water Companies in terms of the Principle of Legal Certainty? The writing of this paper uses a normative juridical method with the Statue Approach and Analytical Approach. In analysing this research, several theories are employed, including the theory of legal certainty, the theory of norm hierarchy, and the theory of norm conflict. The researcher obtains answers to the existing problems by analysing the legal certainty of the probationary period regulation. In terms of the theory of legal certainty by Jan Michiel Otto, it aligns with Lord Lyod's opinion on the meaning of legal certainty, which is consistent, stable, and clear. The regulation in Article 33 Paragraph (2) of the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation does not meet the principle of legal certainty. While the regulation in the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation in Article 33 Paragraph (2) is consistent and clear, it lacks consistency. This is because the regulation should comply with labour laws where the maximum probationary period is 3 months, while in the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation, the probationary period is a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 6 months.
Co-Authors ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Azahra Hajar Gautama RATNAWATI Rayhan Rizky Fitrianto Reka Dewantara Yenny Eta Widyanti