Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INSPIRAMATIKA Sintaksis: Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Alifatun Ni’mah
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : INSPIRAMATIKA

 1 
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA Luluk Faridah; Heny Ekawati Haryono; Alifatun Ni’mah
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 6 No 1 (2020): Inspiramatika, June 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 8 grade VII-A students of SMP NU SIMO for the 2019/2020 academic year. The determination of the subject was based on the results of a questionnaire on the characteristics of the way of thinking. The data used are test results and recorded interview results. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete sequential type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the SK1 subject is at the level of only fulfilling 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Whereas in the SK2 subject only fulfills 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 3, 4, 5, and 7. (2) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of students' abstract sequential type of thinking in solving problems on the subject of SA1 and SA2 is at a level that meets all indicators of concept understanding. (3) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on AK1 subjects is at a level that only meets 5 indicators of conceptual understanding, namely 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7. While the AK2 subject is at a level that is meet all indicators of concept understanding. (4) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of abstract random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the AA1 subject is at a level that only meets 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely 3, 4, 5, 7. Whereas in AA2 subject only meets 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA Luluk Faridah; Heny Ekawati Haryono; Alifatun Ni’mah
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 6 No 1 (2020): Inspiramatika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, June 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 8 grade VII-A students of SMP NU SIMO for the 2019/2020 academic year. The determination of the subject was based on the results of a questionnaire on the characteristics of the way of thinking. The data used are test results and recorded interview results. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete sequential type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the SK1 subject is at the level of only fulfilling 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Whereas in the SK2 subject only fulfills 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 3, 4, 5, and 7. (2) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of students' abstract sequential type of thinking in solving problems on the subject of SA1 and SA2 is at a level that meets all indicators of concept understanding. (3) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on AK1 subjects is at a level that only meets 5 indicators of conceptual understanding, namely 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7. While the AK2 subject is at a level that is meet all indicators of concept understanding. (4) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of abstract random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the AA1 subject is at a level that only meets 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely 3, 4, 5, 7. Whereas in AA2 subject only meets 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
Co-Authors Ahmad Nashrudin Eka Syovi Arianti Heny Ekawati Haryono Luluk Faridah Shidqi Hamdi Pratama Putera Suyanto Suyanto